Sociology of neuroscience or neurosociology?

Advances in Medical Sociology

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages 255-278

  Scheve, Christian Von ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886415095     PISSN: 10576290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013015     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Abi-Rached, J. M. (2008). The implications of the new brain sciences. EMBO Reports, 9(12), 1158-1162.
2. Adolphs, R. (1999). Social cognition and the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 469-479.
3. Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165-178. (Pubitemid 37280182)
4. Alcock, J. (2001). The triumph of sociobiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602-614.
6. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In: R. S. Wyer (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life (pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 925-945.
8. Beaulieu, A. (2002). Images are not the (only) truth: Brain mapping, visual knowledge, and iconoclasm. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 53-86. (Pubitemid 36649964)
9. Bennett, C. M., & Miller, M. B. (2010). How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 133-155.
10. Benton, T. (1991). Biology and social science: Why the return of the repressed should be given a (cautious) welcome. Sociology, 25(1), 1-29.
11. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
12. Bogen, J. E., DeZure, R., TenHouten, W. D., & Marsch, J. F. (1972). The other side of the brain, IV: The A/P ratio. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 37(2), 49-61.
13. Bohnet, I. (2009). Experiments. In: P. Hedström & P. Bearman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology (pp. 639-665). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Brothers, L. (1997). Friday's footprint. How society shapes the human mind. New York, NY: HhOxford University Press.
17. Burnham, T., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Analyse & Kritik, 27, 113-135.
18. Burri, R. V. (2009). Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 498-511.
19. Bury, M. R. (1997). Health and illness in a changing society. London: Routledge.
20. Cacioppo, J., & Berntson, G. G. (1992). Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain. American Psychologist, 47, 1019-1028.
21. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior, social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 829-843.
22. Camerer, C. (2008). Neuroeconomics: Opening the gray box. Neuron, 60(3), 416-419.
23. Chiao, J. Y. (2009). Cultural neuroscience: A once and future discipline. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 287-304.
24. Chiao, J. Y., & Cheon, B. K. (2010). The weirdest brains in the world. Commentary on Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan: The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 28-30.
25. Chiao, J. Y., Hariri, A. R., Harada, T., Mano, Y., Sadato, N., Parrish, T. B., & Iidaka, T. (2010). Theory and methods in cultural neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2-3), 356-361.
26. Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Lipke, T. (2009). Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174-181.
27. Choudhury, S., Nagel, S. K., & Slaby, J. (2009). Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties, 4, 61-77.
28. Churchland, P. S. (1989). Neurophilosophy. Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Collins, H. M. (1983). The sociology of scientific knowledge, studies of contemporary science. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 265-283.
30. Conrad, P. (2000). Sociological perspectives on the new genetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31. Cregan, K. (2006). The sociology of the body:Mapping the abstraction ofembodiment. London: Sage.
32. Dingwall, R., Nerlich, B., & Hillyard, S. (2003). Biological determinism and symbolic interaction: Hereditary streams and cultural roads. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 631-644. (Pubitemid 38148792)
33. Dobbs, D. (2005). Fact or phrenology? Scientific American Mind, 16, 24-31.
34. Dominguez Duque, J. F., Turner, R., Lewis, E. D., & Egan, G. (2010). Neuroanthropology: A humanistic science for the study of the culture-brain nexus. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2-3), 138-147.
35. Dumit, J. (2004). Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Dunbar, R. I. (2002). The social brain hypothesis. In: J. T. Cacioppo, G. G. Berntson, R. Adolphs, C. S. Carter, R. J. Davidson, M. K. McClintock, B. S. McEwen, M. J. Meaney, D. L. Schacter, E. M. Sternberg, S. S. Suomi & S. E. Taylor (Eds.), Foundations in social neuroscience (pp. 69-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Durkheim, E. (1964). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: Free Press.
38. Ehrenberg, A. (2009). Weariness of the self, diagnosing the history of depression in the contemporary age. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
39. Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 43-64.
40. Franks, D. D. (1999). Some convergences and divergences between neuroscience and symbolic interaction. In: D. D. Franks & T. S. Smith (Eds.), Mind, brain, and society, toward a neurosociology of emotion (pp. 157-182). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Franks, D. D. (2010). Neurosociology. The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
42. Freese, J. (2008). Genetics and the social science explanation of individual outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S1-35.
43. Freese, J., Li, J.-C., & Wade, L. D. (2003). The potential relevances of biology to social inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 233-256. (Pubitemid 37416682)
44. Freese, J., & Shostak, S. (2009). Genetics and social inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 107-128.
45. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1985). The social brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46. Gerhards, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2009). Two normative models of science in public: Human genome sequencing inGerman andUS print media. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 437-451.
47. Guo, G. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on society and genetics. Sociological Methods and Research, 37, 159-163.
48. Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (2007). The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Review Neuroscience, 9, 646-654. (Pubitemid 352032114)
50. Harmon-Jones, E., & Beer, J. S. (Eds.). (2009). Methods in social neuroscience. New York, NY: Guilford.
51. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010a). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.
52. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). Most people are not weird. Nature, 466, 2910.1038/466029a.
53. Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.
54. Ignatow, G. (2007). Theories of embodied knowledge, new directions for cultural and cognitive sociology? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 115-135.
55. Joyce, K. (2008). Magnetic appeal: MRI and the myth of transparency. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
57. Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S., & Baker, C. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 535-540.
58. Kurath, M. (2009). Nanotechnology governance: Accountability and democracy in new modes of regulation and deliberation. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 5(2), 87-110.
59. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
60. Lippman, A. (1992). Led (astray) by genetic maps, the cartography of the human genome and health care. Social Science Medicine, 35, 1469-1476.
61. Littlefield, M. M. (2009). Constructing the organ of deceit: The rhetoric of fMRI and brain fingerprinting in post-9/11America. Science, Technology&Human Values, 34, 365-392.
62. Littlefield, M. M. (2010). Matter for thought: The Psychon in neurology, psychology and American Culture, 1927-1943. In: L. Salisbury & A. Shail (Eds.), Neurology and modernity (pp. 267-286). New York, NY: Palgrave.
63. Lizardo, O. (2005). The cognitive origins of Bourdieu's Habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 375-401.
64. Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453, 869-878.
65. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action, ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
66. Malsch, T. (2001). Naming the unnamable, socionics or the sociological turn of/to distributed artificial intelligence. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 4(3), 155-186.
67. Massey, D. S. (2002). A brief history of human society, the origin and role of emotion in social life. American Sociological Review, 67, 1-29. (Pubitemid 34290687)
68. Mateo, M. M., Cabanis, M., Loebell, N. C. E., & Krach, S. (2011). Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006.
69. May, C. (2002). The information society. A sceptical view. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
70. McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343-352. (Pubitemid 351375186)
71. Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2004). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
72. Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I. (2004). Genomics: Shifts in metaphorical landscape. New Genetics and Society, 23(3), 255-268.
73. Newton, T. (2003). Truly embodied sociology, marrying the social and the biological? The Sociological Review, 51(1), 20-42.
74. Nielsen, F. (1994). Sociobiology and sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 267-303.
75. Pickel, A. (2005). The habitus process: a biopsychosocial conception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(4), 437-461. (Pubitemid 43003186)
76. Pickersgill, M. (2009). Between soma and society: Neuroscience and the ontology of psychopathy. BioSocieties, 4(1), 45-60.
77. Pickersgill, M. D. (2010). Psyche, soma, and science studies: New directions in the sociology of mental health and illness. Journal of Mental Health, 19(4), 382-392.
78. Poldrack, R. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59-63. (Pubitemid 43177179)
79. Poldrack, R. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience, where do we stand? Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 18, 223-227.
80. Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O., & Illes, J. (2005). fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 159-164. (Pubitemid 40188949)
81. Rees, D., & Rose, S. (Eds.). (2004). The new brain sciences, perils and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Reichertz, J., & Zaboura, N. (Eds.). (2006). Akteur Gehirn-oder das vermeintliche Ende des handelnden Subjekts: Eine Kontroverse. [The brain as social actor - or the alleged end of the acting subject: A controversy. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
83. Rinaldi, A. (2009). Homo economicus? EMBO reports, 10, 823-826.
84. Rizzolati, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. (Pubitemid 39050401)
85. Rose, N. (2003). Neurochemical selves. Society, 41(1), 46-59. (Pubitemid 37489264)
86. Rose, N. (2010). Normality and pathology in a biomedical age. In: B. Carter & N. Charles (Eds.), Nature, society and environmental crisis (pp. 66-83). Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.
87. Rose, S. (2006). The future of the brain, the promise and perils of tomorrow's neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88. Schäfer, M. S. (2009). From public understanding to public engagement: A comparison of mass media coverage on different science issues. Science Communication, 30(4), 475-505.
89. von Scheve, C. (2009). Emotionen und soziale Strukturen: Die affektiven Grundlagen sozialer Ordnung [Emotion and social structures: The affective foundations of social order]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
90. von Scheve, C., & Moldt, D. (2004). Emotion, theoretical investigations and implications for artificial social aggregates. In: G. Lindeman, D. Moldt & P. Paolucci (Eds.), Regulated agent-based social systems (pp. 189-209). Berlin: Springer. (Pubitemid 38271429)
91. von Scheve, C., & von Luede, R. (2005). Emotion and social structures: Towards an interdisciplinary approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 303-328. (Pubitemid 41352639)
92. Shapin, S. (1995). Here and everywhere, sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289-321.
93. Sloan, P. R. (2000). Completing the tree of Descartes. In: P. R. Sloan (Ed.), Controlling our destinies, historical, philosophical, ethical, and theological perspectives on the human genome project (pp. 1-25). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
94. Smith, T. S., & Franks, D. D. (1999). Emergence, reduction, and levels of analysis in the neurosociological paradigm. In: D. D. Franks & T. S. Smith (Eds.), Mind, brain, and society, toward a neurosociology of emotion (pp. 3-16). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
95. TenHouten, W. (1997). Neurosociology. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 20(1), 7-37.
96. TenHouten, W. D. (1999). Explorations in neurosociological theory. In: D. D. Franks & T. S. Smith (Eds.), Mind, brain, and society, toward a neurosociology of emotion (pp. 41-80). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
97. TenHouten, W. D., & Kaplan, C. D. (1973). Science and its mirror image: A theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
98. Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
99. Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
100. Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22, 5-36.
101. Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274-290.
102. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470-477. (Pubitemid 351317605)
103. Williams, S. J. (2009). A 'neurosociology' of emotion? Progress, problems and prospects. In: D. Hopkins, J. Kleres, H. Flam & H. Kuzmics (Eds.), Theorizing emotions (pp. 245-268). Frankfurt: Campus.
104. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
105. Zaboura, N. (2009). Das empathische Gehirn: Spiegelneurone als Grundlage menschlicher Kommunikation [The empathic brain: Mirror neurons as a foundation of human communication]. Wiesbaden: VS.
106. Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.