Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1595-1600

  Chechik, Ofir ^a   Khashan, Morsi ^a   Lador, Ran ^a   Salai, Moshe ^a   Amar, Eyal ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Cement; Hip; Surgical approach

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CEMENTOPLASTY; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXPERT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREND STUDY; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROSTHESIS RETENTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84886391581     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1828-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr (2007) Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 78(3):315-326
2. Huo MH, Osier CJ (2008) Is cement still a fixation option for total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 23(7 Suppl):51-54
3. Puolakka TJ, Pajamäki KJ, Pulkkinen PO, Nevalainen JK (1999) Poor survival of cementless Biomet total hip: a report on 1,047 hips from the finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 70(5):425-429
4. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ (2010) Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25(5):671-9.e1
5. Barton C, Kim PR (2009) Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hiparthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 40(3):371-375
6. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2005) Evidence-based medicine for orthopedic surgeons. J Knee Surg 18(1):57-63
7. Suk M, Hanson B, Helfet DL (2010) Evidence-based orthopedic surgery: is it possible? Orthop Clin North Am 241(2):139-143
8. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER (2004) Surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: direct lateral or posterior? J Rheumatol 31(9):1790-1796
9. Lindgren V, Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Wretenberg P (2012) The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83(6):559-565
10. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ (2006) Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:34-38
11. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER (2006) Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9(3):CD003828
12. Teratani T, Naito M, Shiramizu K (2010) Intraoperative muscle damage in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25(6):977-981 Epub 2009 Jul 4
13. Kakar S, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch EH, International Hip Fracture Research Collaborative et al (2007) Technical considerations in the operative management of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a multinational survey. J Trauma 63(3):641-646
14. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 12(3):123-129
15. Müller M, Schwachmeyer V, Tohtz S, Tohtz S, Duda GN, Perka C, Heller MO (2012) The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(5):725-731
16. Auffarth A, Resch H, Lederer S, Karpik S, Hitzl W, Bogner R, Mayer M, Matis N (2011) Does the choice of approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in geriatric patients significantly influence early postoperative outcomes? A randomized-controlled trial comparing the modified Smith-Petersen and Hardinge approaches. J Trauma 70(5):1257-1262
17. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB (1995) The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(10):1543-1550
18. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE (2000) The Norwegian arthroplasty register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71(4):337-353
19. Havelin LI, Robertsson O, Fenstad AM, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Furnes O (2011) A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the nordic arthroplasty register association (NARA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 21(93 Suppl 3):13-19
20. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Emerson CB, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins LL (2002) A comparison of cemented and cementless titanium femoral components used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic and survivorship study. J Arthroplast 17(5):584-591
21. Müller LA, Wenger N, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Forst R, Carl HD (2011) 17-year follow-up of the rough-blasted threaded Weill cup in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(4):557-561
22. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Tugwell P, Wong C (2002) Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84(A10):1823-1828
23. Ström H, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Sahlstedt B, Milbrink J (2006) Comparison of the uncemented Cone and the cemented Bimetric hip prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis: an RSA, clinical and radiographic study. Acta Orthop 77(1):71-78
24. Burston BJ, Barnett AJ, Amirfeyz R, Yates PJ, Bannister GC (2012) Clinical and radiological results of the collarless polished tapered stem at 15 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(7):889-894
25. Clement ND, Biant LC, Breusch SJ (2012) Total hip arthroplasty: to cement or not to cement the acetabular socket? A critical review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(3):411-427
26. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH (2011) Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(4):449-455
27. Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH (2011) Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. A concise follow-up, at twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 20 93(14):1335-1338
28. Kim YH, Oh SW, Kim JS (2002) Prevalence of fat embolism following bilateral simultaneous and unilateral total hip arthroplasty performed with or without cement: a prospective, randomized clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(A8):1372-1379
29. Christie J, Burnett R, Potts HR, Pell AC (1994) Echocardiography of transatrial embolism during cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3):409-412
30. Koessler MJ, Fabiani R, Hamer H, Pitto RP (2001) The clinical relevance of embolic events detected by transesophageal echocardiography during cemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 92(1):49-55
31. Pitto RP, Koessler M, Kuehle JW (1999) Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(6):831-843
32. Nayak KN, Mulliken B, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Woolfrey MR (1997) Prevalence of heterotopic ossification in cemented versus noncemented total hip joint replacement in patients with osteoarthrosis: a randomized clinical trial. Can J Surg 40(5):368-374
33. Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Furnes O, Havelin LI (2006) Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 77(3):351-358