Single cell pattern formation and transient cytoskeletal arrays

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 51-59

  Bement, William M ^a,b   von Dassow, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN; MESSENGER RNA; MORPHOGEN; MYOSIN; PROTEIN CDC42; RAC PROTEIN; RHO FACTOR; SEPTIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ACTIN FILAMENT; CELL FUNCTION; CELL REGENERATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CYTOKINESIS; CYTOSKELETON; DROSOPHILA; EXOCYTOSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE CELL PATTERN FORMATION; WOUND HEALING; YEAST;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ANIMALS; CELL SHAPE; CYTOKINESIS; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS;

EID: 84886302685     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.09.005     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Turing A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans Royal Soc 1952, 237:37-72.
2. Sanson B. Generating patterns from fields of cells. Examples from Drosophila segmentation. EMBO Rep 2001, 2:1083-1088.
3. Jaeger J. The gap gene network. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011, 68:243-274.
4. Dubnau J., Struhl G. RNA recognition and translational regulation by a homeodomain protein. Nature 1996, 379:694-699.
5. Chen H., Xu Z., Mei C., Yu D., Small S. A system of repressor gradients spatially organizes the boundaries of Bicoid-dependent target genes. Cell 2012, 149:618-629.
6. Wimmer E.A., Carleton A., Harjes P., Turner T., Desplan C. Bicoid-independent formation of thoracic segments in Drosophila. Science 2000, 287:2476-2479.
7. Kraut R., Levine M. Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. Development 1991, 111:611-621.
8. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 1988, 54:95-104.
9. Wharton R.P., Struhl G. RNA regulatory elements mediate control of Drosophila body pattern by the posterior morphogen nanos. Cell 1991, 67:955-967.
10. Bement W.M., Miller A.L., von Dassow G. Rho GTPase activity zones and transient contractile arrays. Bioessays 2006, 28:983-993.
11. Bishop A.L., Hall A. Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem J 2000, 348(Pt 2):241-255.
12. Blumenstein L., Ahmadian M.R. Models of the cooperative mechanism for Rho effector recognition: implications for RhoA-mediated effector activation. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:53419-53426.
13. Bastos R.N., Penate X., Bates M., Hammond D., Barr F.A. CYK4 inhibits Rac1-dependent PAK1 and ARHGEF7 effector pathways during cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 2012, 198:865-880.
14. Amano N.M., Mukai H., Ono Y., Chihara K., Matsui T., Hamajima Y., Okawa K., Iwamatsu A., Kaibuchi K. Identification of a putative target for Rho as the serine-threonine kinase protein kinase. Science 1996, 271:648-650.
15. Yoshinaga C., Mukai H., Toshimori M., Miyamoto M., Ono Y. Mutational analysis of the regulatory mechanism of PKN: the regulatory region of PKN contains an arachidonic acid-sensitive autoinhibitory domain. J Biochem 1999, 126:475-484.
16. Rohatgi R., Ma L., Miki H., Lopez M., Kirchhausen T., Takenawa T., Kirschner M.W. The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly. Cell 1999, 97:221-231.
17. Higgs H.N., Pollard T.D. Activation by Cdc42 and PIP(2) of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) stimulates actin nucleation by Arp2/3 complex. J Cell Biol 2000, 150:1311-1320.
18. Guilluy C., Garcia-Mata R., Burridge K. Rho protein crosstalk: another social network?. Trends Cell Biol 2011, 21:718-726.
19. Houssa B., de Widt J., Kranenburg O., Moolenaar W.H., van Blitterswijk W.J. Diacylglycerol kinase theta binds to and is negatively regulated by active RhoA. J Biol Chem 1999, 274:6820-6822.
20. Wing M.R., Snyder J.T., Sondek J., Harden T.K. Direct activation of phospholipase C-epsilon by Rho. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:41253-41258.
21. Fritsch R., de Krijger I., Fritsch K., George R., Reason B., Kumar M.S., Diefenbacher M., Stamp G., Downward J. RAS and RHO families of GTPases directly regulate distinct phosphoinositide 3-kinase isoforms. Cell 2013, 153:1050-1063.
22. Lee C.S., Choi C.K., Shin E.Y., Schwartz M.A., Kim E.G. Myosin II directly binds and inhibits Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factors: a possible link to Rho family GTPases. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:663-674.
23. Wiggan O., Shaw A.E., DeLuca J.G., Bamburg J.R. ADF/cofilin regulates actomyosin assembly through competitive inhibition of myosin II binding to F-actin. Dev Cell 2012, 22:530-543.
24. Athale C.A., Dinarina A., Mora-Coral M., Pugieux C., Nedelec F., Karsenti E. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by reaction cascades around chromosomes. Science 2008, 322:1243-1247.
25. Antonny B. Mechanisms of membrane curvature sensing. Annu Rev Biochem 2011, 80:101-123.
26. Benink H.A., Bement W.M. Concentric zones of active RhoA and Cdc42 around single cell wounds. J Cell Biol 2005, 168:429-439.
27. Mandato C.A., Bement W.M. Contraction and polymerization cooperate to assemble and close actomyosin rings around Xenopus oocyte wounds. J Cell Biol 2001, 154:785-797.
28. Kono K., Saeki Y., Yoshida S., Tanaka K., Pellman D. Proteasomal degradation resolves competition between cell polarization and cellular wound healing. Cell 2012, 150:151-164.
29. Abreu-Blanco M.T., Verboon J.M., Parkhurst S.M. Cell wound repair in Drosophila occurs through three distinct phases of membrane and cytoskeletal remodeling. J Cell Biol 2011, 193:455-464.
30. Lin P., Zhu H., Cai C., Wang X., Cao C., Xiao R., Pan Z., Weisleder N., Takeshima H., Ma J. Nonmuscle myosin IIA facilitates vesicle trafficking for MG53-mediated cell membrane repair. FASEB J 2012, 26:1875-1883.
31. Clark A.G., Miller A.L., Vaughan E., Yu H.Y., Penkert R., Bement W.M. Integration of single and multicellular wound responses. Curr Biol 2009, 19:1389-1395.
32. Vaughan E.M., Miller A.L., Yu H.Y., Bement W.M. Control of local Rho GTPase crosstalk by Abr. Curr Biol 2011, 21:270-277.
33. Chuang T.H., Xu X., Kaartinen V., Heisterkamp N., Groffen J., Bokoch G.M. Abr and Bcr are multifunctional regulators of the Rho GTP-binding protein family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92:10282-10286.
34. Simon C.M., Vaughan E.M., Bement W.M., Edelstein-Keshet L. Pattern formation of Rho GTPases in single cell wound healing. Mol Biol Cell 2013, 24:421-432.
35. Orchard R.C., Kittisopikul M., Altschuler S.J., Wu L.F., Süel G.M., Alto N.M. Identification of F-actin as the dynamic hub in a microbial-induced GTPase polarity circuit. Cell 2012, 148:803-815.
36. Burkel B.M., Benink H.A., Vaughan E.M., von Dassow G., Bement W.M. A Rho GTPase signal treadmill backs a contractile array. Dev Cell 2012, 23:384-396.
37. Slaughter B.D., Smith S.E., Li R. Symmetry breaking in the life cycle of the budding yeast. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009, 1:a003384.
38. Bi E., Park H.O. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics 2012, 191:347-387. Review. 10.1534/genetics.111.132886.
39. Tong Z., Gao X.D., Howell A.S., Bose I., Lew D.J., Bi E. Adjacent positioning of cellular structures enabled by a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein-mediated zone of inhibition. J Cell Biol 2007, 179:1375-1384.
40. Goryachev A.B., Pokhilko A.V. Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing-type mechanism of yeast cell polarity. FEBS Lett 2008, 582:1437-1443.
41. Howell A.S., Savage N.S., Johnson S.A., Bose I., Wagner A.W., Zyla T.R., Nijhout H.F., Reed M.C., Goryachev A.B., Lew D.J. Singularity in polarization: rewiring yeast cells to make two buds. Cell 2009, 139:731-743. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.024.
42. Howell A.S., Jin M., Wu C.F., Zyla T.R., Elston T.C., Lew D.J. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 2012, 149:322-333.
43. Barral Y., Mermall V., Mooseker M.S., Snyder M. Compartmentalization of the cell cortex by septins is required for maintenance of cell polarity in yeast. Mol Cell 2000, 5:841-851.
44. Okada S., Leda M., Hanna J., Savage N.S., Bi E., Goryachev A.B. Daughter cell identity emerges from the interplay of cdc42, septins, and exocytosis. Dev Cell 2013, 26:148-161.
45. Bement W.M., Benink H.A., von Dassow G. A microtubule-dependent zone of active RhoA during cleavage plane specification. J Cell Biol 2005, 170:91-101.
46. Ma C., Benink H.A., Cheng D., Montplaisir V., Wang L., Xi Y., Zheng P.P., Bement W.M., Liu X.J. Cdc42 activation couples spindle positioning to first polar body formation in oocyte maturation. Curr Biol 2006, 16:214-220.
47. Zhang X., Ma C., Miller A.L., Katbi H.A., Bement W.M., Liu X.J. Polar body emission requires a RhoA contractile ring and Cdc42-mediated membrane protrusion. Dev Cell 2008, 15:386-400.
48. Somers W.G., Saint R. A RhoGEF and Rho family GTPase-activating protein complex links the contractile ring to cortical microtubules at the onset of cytokinesis. Dev Cell 2003, 4:29-39.
49. Su K.C., Takaki T., Petronczki M. Targeting of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the equatorial membrane controls cleavage furrow formation during cytokinesis. Dev Cell 2011, 21:1104-1115.
50. Miller A.L., Bement W.M. Regulation of cytokinesis by Rho GTPase flux. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11:71-77.
51. Zanin E., Desai A., Poser I., Toyoda Y., Andree C., Moebius C., Bickle M., Conradt B., Piekny A., Oegema K. A Conserved RhoGAP limits M phase contractility and coordinates with microtubule asters to confine RhoA during cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2013, 26:496-510. pii: S1534-5807(13)00474-7.
52. von Dassow G., Verbrugghe K.J., Miller A.L., Sider J.R., Bement W.M. Action at a distance during cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 2009, 187:831-845.
53. Tatsumoto T., Xie X., Blumenthal R., Okamoto I., Miki T. Human ECT2 is an exchange factor for Rho GTPases, phosphorylated in G2/M phases, and involved in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 1999, 147:921-928.
54. Mandato C.A., Benink H.A., Bement W.M. Microtubule-actomyosin interactions in cortical flow and cytokinesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2000, 45:87-92.
55. Canman J.C., Lewellyn L., Laband K., Smerdon S.J., Desai A., Bowerman B., Oegema K. Inhibition of Rac by the GAP activity of centralspindlin is essential for cytokinesis. Science 2008, 322:1543-1546.
56. Loria A., Longhini K.M., Glotzer M. The RhoGAP domain of CYK-4 has an essential role in RhoA activation. Curr Biol 2012, 22:213-219.
57. Jantsch-Plunger V., Gönczy P., Romano A., Schnabel H., Hamill D., Schnabel R., Hyman A.A., Glotzer M. CYK-4: a Rho family gtpase activating protein (GAP) required for central spindle formation and cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 2000, 149:1391-1404.
58. Nishimura Y., Yonemura S. Centralspindlin regulates ECT2 and RhoA accumulation at the equatorial cortex during cytokinesis. J Cell Sci 2006, 119(Pt 1):104-114. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
59. Wong R., Hadjiyanni I., Wei H.C., Polevoy G., McBride R., Sem K.P., Brill J.A. PIP2 hydrolysis and calcium release are required for cytokinesis in Drosophila spermatocytes. Curr Biol 2005, 15:1401-1406.
60. Webb S.E., Lee K.W., Karplus E., Miller A.L. Localized calcium transients accompany furrow positioning, propagation, and deepening during the early cleavage period of zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 1997, 192:78-92.
61. Das A., Slaughter B.D., Unruh J.R., Bradford W.D., Alexander R., Rubinstein B., Li R. Flippase-mediated phospholipid asymmetry promotes fast Cdc42 recycling in dynamic maintenance of cell polarity. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:304-310.
62. Field S.J., Madson N., Kerr M.L., Galbraith K.A., Kennedy C.E., Tahiliani M., Wilkins A., Cantley L.C. PtdIns(4,5)P2 functions at the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2005, 15:1407-1412.
63. Kee Y.S., Ren Y., Dorfman D., Iijima M., Firtel R., Iglesias P.A., Robinson D.N. A mechanosensory system governs myosin II accumulation in dividing cells. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:1510-1523.
64. Lafaurie-Janvore J., Maiuri P., Wang I., Pinot M., Manneville J.B., Betz T., Balland M., Piel M. ESCRT-III assembly and cytokinetic abscission are induced by tension release in the intercellular bridge. Science 2013, 339:1625-1629.
65. Burton K., Taylor D.L. Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata. Nature 1997, 385:450-454.
66. Sedzinski J., Biro M., Oswald A., Tinevez J.Y., Salbreux G., Paluch E. Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow. Nature 2011, 476:462-466.
67. Goehring N.W., Grill S.W. Cell polarity: mechanochemical patterning. Trends Cell Biol 2013, 23:72-80.