A new procedure for computing equivalence bands in personnel selection

Human Performance

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 351-365

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Cortina, Jose M ^b   Goldberg, Edie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Towers Perrin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032377862     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1104_4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21, 1141-1158.
2. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (1996). Intervening in emerging markets: Back to the basics, or go home empty-handed. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 33(3), 84-87.
3. Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (1998a). Heterogeneity of error variance and the assessment of moderating effects of categorical variables: A conceptual review. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 296-314.
4. Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (1998b). Statistical power computations for detecting dichotomous moderator variables with moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 668-676.
5. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Estimating the power to detect dichotomous moderators with moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 690-692.
6. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
7. Aguinis, H., & Whitehead, R. (1997). Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under indirect range restriction: Implications for validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 528-538.
8. Barrett, G. V., Doverspike, D., & Arthur, W. (1995). The current status of the judicial review of banding: A clarification. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 33(2), 39-41.
9. Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25-42.
10. Cascio, W. F., Goldstein, I. L., Outtz, J., & Zedeck, S. (1995). Twenty issues and answers about sliding bands. Human Performance, 8, 227-242.
11. Cascio, W. F., Outtz, J., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 233-264.
12. Cascio, W. F., Zedeck, S., Goldstein, I. L., & Outtz, J. (1995). Selective science or selective interpretation? American Psychologist, 50, 881-882.
13. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
14. Gutman, A., & Christiansen, N. (1997). Further clarification of the judicial status of banding. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 35(1), 75-81.
15. Murphy, K. R. (1994). Potential effects of banding as a function of test reliability. Personnel Psychology, 47, 477-495.
16. Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1995). Evaluating the logical critique of banding. Human Performance, 8, 191-201.
17. Murphy, K. R., Osten, K., & Myors, B. (1995). Modeling the effects of banding in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 48, 61-84.
18. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Sackett, P. R., & Wilk, S. L. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49, 929-954.
20. Schmidt, F. L. (1991). Why all banding procedures are logically flawed. Human Performance, 4, 265-277.
21. Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Personnel psychology at the cutting edge. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel psychology in organizations (pp. 497-515). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
22. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1995). The fatal internal contradiction in banding: Its statistical rationale is logically inconsistent with its operational procedures. Human Performance, 8, 203-214.
23. Siskin, B. R. (1995). Relation between performance and banding. Human Performance, 8, 215-226.
24. Zedeck, S., Cascio, W. F., Goldstein, I. L., & Outtz, J. (1996). Sliding bands: An alternative to top-down selection. In R. Barrett (Ed.), Handbook of fair employment strategies (pp. 222-234). Westport, CT: Quorum.
25. Zedeck, S., Outtz, J., Cascio, W. F., & Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Why do "testing experts" have such limited vision? Human Performance, 4, 297-308.