Responsive Membranes for Water Treatment

Responsive Membranes and Materials

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 143-162

  Yang, Qian ^a   Wickramasinghe, S R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Base membrane; Liquids; Responsive membranes; Surface modification; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886121326     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118389553.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Malaeb, L. and Ayoub, G.M. (2011) Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: State of the art review. Desalination, 267, 1-8.
2. Goncharuk, V.V., Kavitskaya, A.A. and Skil'skaya, M.D. (2011) Nanofiltration in drinking water supply. J. Water Chem. Technol., 33, 37-54.
3. Davey, J. and Schafer, A.I. (2009) Ultrafiltration to supply drinking water in international development: A review of opportunities, in Appropriate Technologies for the Environmental Protection in the DevelopingWorld (ed. E.K. Yanful), Springer Science + Business Media B. V., pp. 151-168.
4. Huang, H., Schwab, K. and Jacangelo, J.G. (2009) Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3011-3019.
5. Zaidi, A., Simms, K. and Kok, S. (1992) The use of micro/ultrafiltration for removal of oil and suspended solids from oilfield brines. Wat. Sci. Tech., 24, 163-176.
6. Cathy, T.Y. (2010) Osmotically and thermally driven membrane processes for enhancement of water recovery in desalination processes. Desalin. Water Treat., 15, 279-286.
7. Shaikh, R.P., Pillay, V., Choonara, Y.E. et al. (2010) A review of multi-responsive membrane systems for rate-modulated drug delivery. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech., 11, 441-459.
8. Hoare, T., Santamaria, J., Goya, G.F. et al. (2009) A magnetically triggered composite membrane for on-demand drug delivery. Nano Lett., 9, 3651-3657.
9. Wandera, D.,Wickramasinghe, S.R. and Huson, S.M. (2010) Stimuli-responsive membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 357, 6-35.
10. Lee, Y.M., Ihmt, S.Y., Shim, J.K. and Kim, J.H. (1995) Preparation of surface-modified stimuli-responsive polymeric membranes by plasma and ultraviolet grafting methods and their riboflavin permeation. Polymer, 36, 81-85.
11. Park, Y.S., Ito, Y. and Imanishi, Y. (1998) Photocontrolled gating by polymer brushes grafted on porous glass filter. Macromolecules, 31, 2606-2610.
12. Liang, L., Feng, X., Peurrung, L. and Viswanathan, V. (1999) Temperature-sensitive membranes prepared by UV photopolymerization of N-isopropylacrylamide on a surface of porous hydrophilic polypropylene membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 162, 235-246.
13. Chung, D.-J., Ito, Y. and Imanishi, Y. (1994) Preparation of porous membranes grafted with poly(spiropyran-containing methacrylate) and photocontrol of permeability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 51, 2027-2033.
14. Oak, M.S., Kobayashi, T., Wang, H.Y. et al. (1997) pH effect on molecular size exclusion of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes having carboxylic acid groups. J. Membr. Sci., 123, 185-195.
15. Ito, Y., Park, Y.S. and Imanishi, Y. (1997) Visualization of critical pH-controlled gating of a porous membrane grafted with polyelectrolyte brushes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 2739-2740.
16. Zhang, H. and Ito, Y. (2001) pH Control of transport through a porous membrane self-assembled with a poly(acrylic acid) loop brush. Langmuir, 17, 8336-8340.
17. Ito,Y. and Park,Y.S. (2000) Signal-responsive gating of porous membranes by polymer brushes. Polym. Adv. Technol., 11, 136-144.
18. Kilduff, J.E., Mattaraj, S., Zhou, M. and Belfort, G. (2005) Kinetics of membrane flux decline: the role of natural colloids and mitigation via membrane surface modification. J. Nanoparticle Res., 7, 525-544.
19. Vankelecon, I.F.J., De Smet, K., Gevers, L.E.M. and Jacobs, P.A. (2003) in Nanofiltratoin: Principles and Applications (eds A.I. Schäfer, A.G. Fane and T.D. Waite), Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 33-65.
20. van der Bruggen, B. (2009) Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a REVIEW. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 114, 630-642.
21. Akhtar, S., Hawes, C., Dudley, L. et al. (1995) Coatings reduce the fouling of microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 107, 209-218.
22. Kim, M., Saito, K., Furusaki, S. et al. (1991) Water flux and protein adsorption of a hollow fiber modified with hydroxyl groups. J. Membr. Sci., 56, 289-302.
23. Chang, I.S., Bag, S.O. and Lee, C.H. (2001) Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection durign membrane filtration of activated sludge. Process Biochem., 36, 855-860.
24. Freger, V., Gilron, J. and Belfer, S. (2002) TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FTIR?AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci., 209, 283-292.
25. Braeken, L., Boussu, K., van der Bruggen, B. and Vandecasteele, C. (2005) Modeling of the adsorption of organic compounds on polymeric nanofiltration membranes in solutions containing two compounds. ChemPhysChem, 6, 1606-1612.
26. Himstedt, H.H., Marshall, K.M. and Wickramasinghe, S.R. (2011) pH responsive nanofiltration membranes by surface modification. J. Membr. Sci., 366, 373-381.
27. Belfort, G., Davis, T.H. and Zydney, A.L. (1994) The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci., 96, 1-58.
28. Himstedt, H.H., Yang, Q., Dasi, L.P. et al. (2011) Magnetically activated micromixers for separation membranes. Langmuir, 27, 5574-5581.
29. Wang, X.-P. (2000) Preparation of crosslinked alginate composite membrane for dehydration of ethanol-water mixtures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 77, 3054-3061.
30. Yang, M.-C. and Tong, J.-H. (1997) Loose ultrafiltration of proteins using hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber. J. Membr. Sci., 132, 63-71.
31. Lohorakre, H.R., Kumbharkar, S.C., Bhole, Y.S. and Kharul, U.K. (2006) Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile based ultrafiltration membrane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 101, 4378-4385.
32. Schacher, F., Ulbricht, M. and Muller, A.H.E. (2009) Self-Supporting, double stimuliresponsive porous membranes from polystyrene-block-poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers. Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 1040-1045.
33. Shi, Q., Su, Y., Ning, X. et al. (2010) Graft polymerization of methacrylic acid onto polyethersulfone for potential pH-responsive membrane materials. J. Membr. Sci., 347, 62-68.
34. Hester, J.F., Olugebefola, S.C. and Mayes, A.M. (2002) Preparation of pH-responsive polymer membranes by self-organization. J. Membr. Sci., 208, 375-388.
35. Kato, K., Uchida, E., Kang, E.-T. et al. (2003) Polymer surface with graft chains. Prog. Polym. Sci., 28, 209-259.
36. Zhao, B. and Brittain, W.J. (2000) Polymer brushes: surface-immobilized macromolecules. Prog. Polym. Sci., 25, 677-710.
37. Yang, Q., Adrus, N., Tomicki, F. and Ulbricht, M. (2011) Composites of functional polymeric hydrogels and porous membranes. J. Mater. Chem., 21, 2783-2811.
38. Gorey, C., Escobar, I.C., Gruden, C. et al. (2008) Development of smart membrane filters for microbial sensing. Sep. Sci. Technol., 43, 4056-4074.
39. Yang, Q., Xu, Z.K., Dai, Z.W. et al. (2005) Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membranes with a novel glycopolymer. Chem. Mater., 17, 3050-3058.
40. Wavhal, D.S. and Fisher, E.R. (2003) Membrane surface modification by plasmainduced polymerization of acrylamide for improved surface properties and reduced protein fouling. Langmuir, 19, 79-85.
41. Wang, Y., Kim, J.H., Choo, K.H. et al. (2000) Hydrophilic modification of polypropylene microfiltration membranes by ozone-induced graft polymerization. J. Membr. Sci., 169, 269-276.
42. Kang, J.S., Shim, J.K., Huh, H. and Lee, Y.M. (2001) Colloidal adsorption of bovine serum albumin on porous polypropylene-g-poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) membrane. Langmuir, 17, 4352-4359.
43. Yang, Q., Xu, Z.K. and Dai, Z.W. (2006) Modulate protein adsorption and enzyme activity by surface modifications on polypropylene microporous membranes, in Proteins at the Solid/Liquid Interfaces (ed. P. Dejardin), Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp. 271-298.
44. Jordan, R., West, N., Ulman, A. et al. (2001) Nanocomposites by surface-initiated living cationic polymerization of 2-oxazolines on functionalized gold nanoparticles. Macromolecules, 34, 1606-1611.
45. Zheng, L., Xie, A.F. and Lean, J.T. (2004) Polystyrene Nanoparticles with anionically polymerized polybutadiene brushes. Macromolecules, 37, 9954-9962.
46. Kim, N.Y., Jeon, N.L., Choi, I.S. et al. (2000) Surface-initiated ring-opening metathesis polymerization on Si/SiO2. Macromolecules, 33, 2793-2795.
47. Blomberg, S., Ostberg, S., Harth, E. et al. (2002) Production of crosslinked, hollow nanoparticles by surface-initiated living free-radical polymerization. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 40, 1309-1320.
48. Ying, L., Yu, W.H., Kang, E.T. and Neoh, K.G. (2004) Functional and surfaceactive membranes from poly(vinylidene fluoride)-graft-poly(acrylic acid) prepared via RAFT-mediated graft copolymerization. Langmuir, 20, 6032-6040.
49. Yang, Q. and Ulbricht, M. (2011) Cylindrical membrane pores with well-defined grafted linear and comblike glycopolymer layers for lectin binding. Macromolecules, 44, 1303-1310.
50. Edmondson, S., Osborne, V.L. and Huck, W.T.S. (2004) Polymer brushes via surfaceinitiated polymerizations. Chem. Soc. Rev., 33, 14-22.
51. Dong, H., Du, H. and Qian, X. (2009) Prediction of pKa values for oligo-methacrylic acids using combined classical and quantum approaches. J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 12857-12859.
52. Mondal, S. andWickramasinghe, S.R. (2008) Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 322, 162-170.
53. Sagle, A.C., Van Wagner, E.M., Ju, H. et al. (2009) PEG-coated reverse osmosis membranes: desalination properties and fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci., 340, 92-108.
54. Szep, A. and Kohlheb, R. (2010) Water treatment technology for produced water. Water Sci. Technol., 62, 2372-2380.
55. Wandera, D., Wickramasinghe, S.R. and Husson, S.M. (2011) Modification and characterization of ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of produced water. J. Membr. Sci., 373, 178-188.
56. Bug, A.L.R., Cates, M.E., Safran, S.A. and Witten, T.A. (1987) Theory of size distribution of associating polymer aggregates. I. Spherical aggregates. J. Chem. Phys., 87, 1824-1833.
57. Halperin, A., Tirrell, M. and Lodge, T.P. (1992) Tethered chains in polymer microstructures. Adv. Polym. Sci., 100, 31-71.
58. Ulbricht, M. (2006) Advanced functional membranes. Polymer, 47, 2217-2262.
59. Yu, S., Liu, X., Liu, J. et al. (2011) Surface modification of thin-film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes with thermo-responsive polymer (TRP) for improved fouling resistance and cleaning efficiency. Sep. Purif. Technol., 76, 283-291.
60. Petrov, S., Ivanova, T., Christova, D. and Ivanova, S. (2005) Modification of polyacrylonitrile membranes with temperature sensitive poly(vinylalcohol-co-vinylacetal). J. Membr. Sci., 261, 1-6.
61. Latulippe, D.R., Mika, A.M., Childs, R.F. et al. (2009) Flux performance and macrosolute sieving behavior of environment responsive formed-in-place ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 342, 227-235.
62. Elbrahmi, K., Rawiso, M. and Francois, J. (1993) Potentiometric titration of acrylamide acrylic-acid copolymers-influence of the concentration. Eur. Polym. J., 29, 1531-1537.
63. Khulbe, K.C., Feng, C. and Matsuura, T. (2010) The art of surface modification of synthetic polymeric membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 111, 855-895.