Water treatment technology for produced water

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2372-2380

  Szép, Angéla ^a   Kohlheb, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^b Uwatech Ltd   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Mobile station; Produced water; Purification plant

Indexed keywords

A PLANTS; AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION; BENEFICIAL USE; CHEMICAL TREATMENTS; COST ANALYSIS; CUT-OFF; DISCHARGE LIMIT; MEMBRANE FILTRATIONS; MOBILE STATION; MONTANA; OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION; OIL INDUSTRIES; OIL RESERVOIRS; POST TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; PRODUCED WATER; THREE STAGES; TREATMENT COSTS; WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; WATER-POOR REGION;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; MICROFILTRATION; OIL FIELDS; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR ENGINEERING; PURIFICATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER INJECTION;

WATER TREATMENT;

POLYAMIDE; PRODUCED WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

BRINE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; OIL INDUSTRY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONDUCTANCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; IRRIGATION (AGRICULTURE); MEMBRANE FILTER; OIL INDUSTRY; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; UNITED STATES; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; WATER TREATMENT;

AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION; FILTRATION; INDUSTRY; PETROLEUM; SODIUM; WATER; WATER PURIFICATION;

MONTANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951662073     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.524     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Donald, L., Suarez, J., Wood, D. & Scott, M. L. 2006 Effect of SAR on water infiltration under a sequential rain-irrigation management system. Agric. Water Manage. 86, 150-164.
2. Fakhru'l-Razi, A., Alireza, P., Luqman, C. A., Dayang, R. A. B., Sayed, S. M. & Zurina, Z. A. 2009 Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 170, 530-551.
3. Hansen, B. R. & Davies, S. H. 1994 Review of potential technologies for the removal of dissolved components from produced water. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 72, 176-188.
4. He, Y. & Jiang, Z. W. 2008 Treating oilfield wastewater: technology review. Filtration Sep. 45, 14-16.
5. Hongting, Z., Vance, G. F., Ganjegunte, G. K. & Urynowicz, M. A. 2008 Use of zeolites for treating natural gas co-produced waters in Wyoming, USA. Desalination 228, 263-276. (Pubitemid 351966203)
6. James, D. W., Hanks, R. J. & Jurinak, J. H. 1984 Modern irrigated soils. Field Crops Res. 8, 232-233.
7. Kertész, Sz., László, Zs., Horváth, Zs. H. & Hodúr, C. 2008 Analysis of nanofiltration parameters of removal of an anionic detergent. Desalination 221, 303-311.
8. Kertész, Sz., Molnár, A. & Hodúr, C. 2009 Vibratory Membrane Ultrafiltration Systems for Oily Wastewater Separation. Synergy and Technical Development, Gödöllocombining double acute accent, Hungary, pp. 65-71.
9. Kremen, S. S. & Tanner, M. 1998 Silt density indices (SDI), percent plugging factor (%PF): their relation to actual foulant deposition. Desalination 119, 259-262. (Pubitemid 29049520)
10. László, Zs. & Hodúr, C. 2007 Purification of thermal wastewater by membrane separation and ozonation. Desalination 206, 333-340. (Pubitemid 46196203)
11. László, Zs., Kertész, Sz., Beszédes, S., Horváth, Zs. H., Szabó, G. & Hodúr, C. 2009 Effect of preozonation on the filterability of model dairy waste water in nanofiltration. Desalination 240, 170-177.
12. Li, N. N., Fane, A. G., Ho, W. S. W. & Matsuura, T. 2008 Membrane Technology and Applications. Wiley, NJ, USA.
13. Ma, H. & Wang, B. 2006 Electrochemical pilot-scale plant for oil field produced wastewater by M/C/Fe electrodes for injection. J. Hazard. Mater. B132, 237-243.
14. Mehmet, Ç., Necati, K. & Ismail, K. 2008 Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes. Desalination 222, 176-186.
15. Mondal, S. & Ranil, W. S. 2008 Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 322, 162-170.
16. Murray-Gulde, C., Heatley, J. E., Tanju, K., Rodgers, J. H. & Myers, J. E. 2003 Performance of a hybrid reverse osmosis-constructed wetland treatment system for brackish oil field produced water. Water Res. 37, 705-713. (Pubitemid 35430332)
17. Shubo, D., Renbi, B., Chen, J. P., Zhanpeng, J., Gang, Y., Fusheng, Z. & Zhongxi, C. 2002 Produced water from polymer flooding process in crude oil extraction: characterization and treatment by a novel crossflow oil-water separator. Sep. Purif. Technol. 29, 207-216.
18. Siriverdin, T. & Dallbauman, L. 2004 Organic matrix in produced water from the osage-skiatook petroleum environmental research site. Chemosphere 57, 463-469. (Pubitemid 39179765)
19. Stergios, G. Y. & Anastasios, J. K. 2002 An assessment of the Silt Density Index based on RO membrane colloidal fouling experiments with iron oxide particles. Desalination 151, 229-238.
20. Sullivan, E. J., Bowman, R. S., Katz, L. & Kinney, K. 2004 Water treatment technology for oil and gas produced water. Identifying Technologies to Improve Regional Water Stewardship, North-Middle Rio Grande Corridor, pp. 216-225.
21. Thompson, T. L., Huan-cheng, P. & Yu-yi, L. 2009 The potential contribution of subsurface drip irrigation to water-saving agriculture in the Western USA. Agric. Sci. China 8, 850-854.
22. Veil, J. A. 1997 Costs for off-site disposal of nonhazardous oil field wastes: salt caverns versus other disposal methods. DOE Report DOE/BC/W-31-109-ENG-38-3.
23. Wang, Y. 2004 Improvement of biodegradability of oil field drilling wastewater using ozone. Ozone Sci. Eng. 26, 309-315.
24. Xu, P., Drewes, J. E. & Heil, D. 2008 Beneficial use of co-produced water through membrane treatment: technical-economic assessment. Desalination 225, 139-155. (Pubitemid 351309088)