Polymerase manager protein UmuD directly regulates Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III α binding to ssDNA

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 41, Issue 19, 2013, Pages 8959-8968

  Chaurasiya, Kathy R ^a   Ruslie, Clarissa ^a   Silva, Michelle C ^a   Voortman, Lukas ^a   Nevin, Philip ^a   Lone, Samer ^a,b   Beuning, Penny J ^a   Williams, Mark C ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPARTIC ACID; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; DNA POLYMERASE; GLYCINE; PROTEIN UMUD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DNA REPLICATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE DISRUPTION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM;

BINDING, COMPETITIVE; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; MUTATION;

EID: 84886049164     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt648     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Johnson, A. and O'Donnell, M. (2005) Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74, 283-315.
2. Kelman, Z. and O'Donnell, M. (1995) DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: structure and function of a chromosomal replicating machine. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 64, 171-200.
3. Conte, E., Vincelli, G., Schaaper, R.M., Bressanin, D., Stefan, A., Dal Piaz, F. and Hochkoeppler, A. (2012) Stabilization of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III epsilon subunit by the theta subunit favors in vivo assembly of the Pol III catalytic core. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 523, 135-143.
4. Taft-Benz, S.A. and Schaaper, R.M. (2004) The theta subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III: a role in stabilizing the epsilon proofreading subunit. J. Bacteriol., 186, 2774-2780.
5. Ellison, V. and Stillman, B. (2001) Opening of the clamp: an intimate view of an ATP-driven biological machine. Cell, 106, 655-660.
6. Gao, D.X. and McHenry, C.S. (2001) Tau binds and organizes Escherichia coli replication proteins through distinct domains: partial proteolysis of terminally tagged tau to determine candidate domains and to assign domain V as the alpha binding domain. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 4433-4440.
7. Clover, B.P. and McHenry, C.S. (2001) The DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: an asymmetric dimeric replicative complex with leading and lagging strand polymerases. Cell, 105, 925-934.
8. Higuchi, K., Katayama, T., Iwai, S., Hidaka, M., Horiuchi, T. and Maki, H. (2003) Fate of DNA replication fork encountering a single DNA lesion during oriC plasmid DNA replication in vitro. Genes Cells, 8, 437-449.
9. Pages, V. and Fuchs, R.P. (2003) Uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA replication during lesion bypass in vivo. Science, 300, 1300-1303.
10. Yeeles, J.T.P. and Marians, K.J. (2011) The Escherichia coli replisome is inherently DNA damage tolerant. Science, 334, 235-238.
11. Fujii, S. and Fuchs, R.P. (2007) Interplay among replicative and specialized DNA polymerases determines failure or success of translesion synthesis pathways. J. Mol. Biol., 372, 883-893.
12. Sassanfar, M. and Roberts, J.W. (1990) Nature of the SOSinducing signal in Escherichia coli: the involvement of DNA replication. J. Mol. Biol., 212, 79-96.
13. Simmons, L.A., Foti, J.J., Cohen, S.E. and Walker, G.C. (2008) In: Bock, A., Curtiss, R. III, Kaper, J.B., Karp, P.D., Neidhardt, F.C., Nystrom, T., Slauch, J.M., Squires, C.L. and Ussary, D. (eds), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
14. Reuven, N.B., Arad, G., Maor-Shoshani, A. and Livneh, Z. (1999) The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD0, RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 31763-31766.
15. Tang, M., Shen, X., Frank, E.G., O'Donnell, M., Woodgate, R. and Goodman, M.F. (1999) UmuD02C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 8919-8924.
16. Wagner, J., Gruz, P., Kim, S.R., Yamada, M., Matsui, K., Fuchs, R.P.P. and Nohmi, T. (1999) The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis. Mol. Cell, 4, 281-286.
17. Jarosz, D.F., Beuning, P.J., Cohen, S.E. and Walker, G.C. (2007) Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol., 15, 70-77.
18. Yang, W. and Woodgate, R. (2007) What a difference a decade makes: insights into translesion DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 15591-15598.
19. Pata, J.D. (2010) Structural diversity of the Y-family DNA polymerases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1804, 1124-1135.
20. Washington, M.T., Carlson, K.D., Freudenthal, B.D. and Pryor, J.M. (2010) Variations on a theme: Eukaryotic Y-family DNA polymerases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1804, 1113-1123.
21. Marsh, L. and Walker, G.C. (1985) Cold sensitivity induced by overproduction of UmuDC in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., 162, 155-161.
22. Opperman, T., Murli, S., Smith, B.T. and Walker, G.C. (1999) A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 9218-9223.
23. Sutton, M.D. and Walker, G.C. (2001) umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is a manifestation of functions of the UmuD2C complex involved in a DNA damage checkpoint control. J. Bacteriol., 183, 1215-1224.
24. Ollivierre, J.N., Fang, J. and Beuning, P.J. (2010) The roles of UmuD in regulating mutagenesis. J. Nucleic Acids, 2010, pii: 947680.
25. Simon, S.M., Sousa, F.J., Mohana-Borges, R. and Walker, G.C. (2008) Regulation of Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis by dimeric intrinsically disordered umuD gene products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 1152-1157.
26. Godoy, V.G., Jarosz, D.F., Simon, S.M., Abyzov, A., Ilyin, V. and Walker, G.C. (2007) UmuD and RecA directly modulate the mutagenic potential of the Y family DNA polymerase DinB. Mol. Cell, 28, 1058-1070.
27. Rajagopalan, M., Lu, C., Woodgate, R., O'Donnell, M., Goodman, M.F. and Echols, H. (1992) Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD0, and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10777-10781.
28. Sutton, M.D., Opperman, T. and Walker, G.C. (1999) The Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD and UmuD0 interact physically with the replicative DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 12373-12378.
29. Silva, M.C., Nevin, P., Ronayne, E.A. and Beuning, P.J. (2012) Selective disruption of the DNA polymerase III alpha-beta complex by the umuD gene products. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 5511-5522.
30. Dohrmann, P.R. and McHenry, C.S. (2005) A bipartite polymerase- processivity factor interaction: Only the internal beta binding site of the alpha subunit is required for processive replication by the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J. Mol. Biol., 350, 228-239.
31. McCauley, M.J., Shokri, L., Sefcikova, J., Venclovas, C., Beuning, P.J. and Williams, M.C. (2008) Distinct double- and single-stranded DNA binding of E. coli replicative DNA polymerase III alpha subunit. ACS Chem. Biol., 3, 577-587.
32. Beuning, P.J., Simon, S.M., Godoy, V.G., Jarosz, D.F. and Walker, G.C. (2006) Characterization of Escherichia coli translesion synthesis polymerases and their accessory factors. Methods Enzymol., 408, 318-340.
33. Beuning, P.J., Simon, S.M., Zemla, A., Barsky, D. and Walker, G.C. (2006) A non-cleavable UmuD variant that acts as a UmuD0 mimic. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 9633-9640.
34. Chaurasiya, K.R., Paramanathan, T., McCauley, M.J. and Williams, M.C. (2010) Biophysical characterization of DNA binding from single molecule force measurements. Phys. Life Rev., 7, 299-341.
35. Vladescu, I.D., McCauley, M.J., Rouzina, I. and Williams, M.C. (2005) Mapping the phase diagram of single DNA molecule force-induced melting in the presence of ethidium. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 158102.
36. Sharma, R. (2010) M.S. Thesis. Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
37. Kozakov, D., Hall, D.R., Beglov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S.R., Shen, Y., Li, K., Zheng, J., Vakili, P., Paschalidis, I. et al. (2010) Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins, 78, 3124-3130.
38. Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S.R. and Vajda, S. (2006) PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins, 65, 392-406.
39. Comeau, S.R., Gatchell, D.W., Vajda, S. and Camacho, C.J. (2004) ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W96-W99.
40. Comeau, S.R., Gatchell, D.W., Vajda, S. and Camacho, C.J. (2004) ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics, 20, 45-50.
41. Tovchigrechko, A. and Vakser, I.A. (2006) GRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, W310-W314.
42. Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R. and Wolfson, H.J. (2005) PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, W363-W367.
43. Lyskov, S. and Gray, J.J. (2008) The RosettaDock server for local protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W233-W238.
44. Ericsson, U.B., Hallberg, B.M., Detitta, G.T., Dekker, N. and Nordlund, P. (2006) Thermofluor-based high-throughput stability optimization of proteins for structural studies. Anal. Biochem., 357, 289-298.
45. Shokri, L., McCauley, M.J., Rouzina, I. and Williams, M.C. (2008) DNA overstretching in the presence of glyoxal: structural evidence of force-induced DNA melting. Biophys. J., 95, 1248-1255.
46. Fang, J., Rand, K.D., Silva, M.C., Wales, T.E., Engen, J.R. and Beuning, P.J. (2010) Conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase manager proteins UmuD and UmuD0. J. Mol. Biol., 398, 40-53.
47. Woodgate, R. and Ennis, D.G. (1991) Levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins and requirements for in vivo UmuD cleavage. Mol. Gen. Genet., 229, 10-16.
48. Amar, A., Al Mamun, M. and Humayun, M.Z. (2009) Spontaneous mutagenesis is elevated in protease-defective cells. Mol. Microbiol., 71, 629-639.
49. Neher, S.B., Sauer, R.T. and Baker, T.A. (2003) Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD0 subunits of UmuD/D0 mediate tethering and substrate processing by the ClpXP protease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 13219-13224.
50. McLenigan, M., Peat, T.S., Frank, E.G., McDonald, J.P., Gonzalez, M., Levine, A.S., Hendrickson, W.A. and Woodgate, R. (1998) Novel Escherichia coli umuD0 mutants: structurefunction insights into SOS mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol., 180, 4658-4666.
51. Battista, J.R., Ohta, T., Nohmi, T., Sun, W. and Walker, G.C. (1990) Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 7190-7194.
52. Ollivierre, J.N., Sikora, J.L. and Beuning, P.J. (2013) Dimer exchange and cleavage specificity of the DNA damage response protein UmuD. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1834, 611-620.
53. Kim, D.R. and McHenry, C.S. (1996) Biotin tagging deletion analysis of domain limits involved in protein-macromolecular interactions: mapping the tau binding domain of the DNA polymerase III alpha subunit. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 20690-20698.
54. Jergic, S., Ozawa, K., Williams, N.K., Su, X.C., Scott, D.D., Hamdan, S.M., Crowther, J.A., Otting, G. and Dixon, N.E. (2007) The unstructured C-terminus of the tau subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is the site of interaction with the alpha subunit. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, 2813-2824.
55. Dohrmann, P.R., Manhart, C.M., Downey, C.D. and McHenry, C.S. (2011) The rate of polymerase release upon filling the gap between Okazaki fragments is inadequate to support cycling during lagging strand synthesis. J. Mol. Biol., 414, 15-27.
56. Georgescu, R.E., Kurth, I., Yao, N.Y., Stewart, J., Yurieva, O. and O'Donnell, M. (2009) Mechanism of polymerase collision release from sliding clamps on the lagging strand. EMBO J., 28, 2981-2991.
57. Kurth, I., Georgescu, R.E. and O'Donnell, M.E. (2013) A solution to release twisted DNA during chromosome replication by coupled DNA polymerases. Nature, 496, 119-122.
58. Pages, V., Janel-Bintz, R. and Fuchs, R.P. (2005) Pol III proofreading activity prevents lesion bypass as evidenced by its molecular signature within E. coli cells. J. Mol. Biol., 352, 501-509.