Non-convex rank minimization via an empirical bayesian approach

Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - Proceedings of the 28th Conference, UAI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 914-923

  Wipf, David ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH ASIA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVEX RELAXATION; EMPIRICAL BAYESIAN; MAP-BASED APPROACH; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PRINCIPLE COMPONENT; RANK MINIMIZATIONS; ROBUST PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VARIATIONAL APPROXIMATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

ESTIMATION;

EID: 84886046670     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Attias, H. A variational Bayesian framework for graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, 2000.
2. Babacan, S.D., Luessi, M., Molina, R., and Katsaggelos, A.K. Sparse Bayesian methods for low-rank matrix estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing (submitted), 2011.
3. Berger, J.O. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2nd edition, 1985.
4. Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
5. Candes, E. and Recht, B. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Found. of Comput. Math., 9, 2008.
6. Candes, E., Li, X., Ma, Y., and Wright, J. Robust principal component analysis? J. ACM, 58(2), May 2011.
7. Chandrasekaran, V., Sanghavi, S., Parrilo, P.A., and Willsky, A.S. Rank-sparsity incoherence for matrix decomposition. SIAM J. Optimization, 21(3), June 2011.
8. Cook, R.L. and Torrance, K.E. A reflectance model for computer graphics. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 15, 1981.
9. Ding, X., He, L., and Carin, L. Bayesian robust principal component analysis. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 20(12), Dec. 2011.
10. Jordan, M.I., Ghahramani, Z., Jaakkola, T., and Saul, L.K. An introduction to variational methods for graphical models. Machine Learning, 37(2):183-233, 1999.
11. Lin, Z., Chen, M., and Ma, Y. The augmented lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. UIUC Technical Report UILU-ENG-09-2214, Oct 2010.
12. Mohan, K. and Fazel, M. Iterative reweighted least squares for matrix rank minimization. Proc. Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, Sept 2010.
13. Tipping, M.E. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1:211-244, 2001.
14. Wipf, D.P. and Nagarajan, S. Iterative reweighted ?1 and ?2 methods for finding sparse solutions. Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (Special Issue on Compressive Sensing), 4(2), April 2010.
15. Wipf, D.P., Rao, B.D., and Nagarajan, S. Latent variable Bayesian models for promoting sparsity. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 57(9), Sept. 2011.
16. Woodham, R.J. Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Optical Engineering, 19(1), 1980.
17. Wu, L., Ganesh, A., Shi, B., Matsushita, Y., Wang, Y., and Ma, Y. Robust photometric stereo via lowrank matrix completion and recovery. Proc. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2010.