Commonalities, differences, and challenges with patient-derived outcome measurement tools: Function/activity scales

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3457-3465

  Noble, Philip C ^a,b   Dwyer, Maureen ^a   Brekke, Adam ^c  

^a Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE; ANALGESIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LIFESTYLE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECREATION; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84885951755     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3118-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, Hale T, Khan F. Do patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing outcomes in rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty capture issues relevant to patients? Results of a systematic review and ICF linking process. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:374-381.
2. Amstutz H, Thomas B, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228-241.
3. Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:831-840.
4. Bayley KB, London MR, Grunkemeier GL, Lansky DJ. Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms. Med Care. 1995;33:AS226-AS35.
5. Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1989;18:14-17.
6. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
7. Brandt E, Pope A, ed. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1997.
8. Button G, Pinney SA. Meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:521-525.
9. Clifford P, Mallon W. Sports after total joint replacement. Clin Sports Med. 2005;24:175-186.
10. Collins NJ, Roos EM. Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a 'good' measure. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28:367-394.
11. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Lohmander LS. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:551-559.
12. Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury. 2005;36:468-476.
13. Franklin PD, Li W, Ayers DC. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award. Functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2597-2604.
14. Ghomrawi HM, Franco Ferrando N, Mandl LA, Do H, Noor N, Gonzalez Della Valle A. How often are patient and surgeon recovery expectations for total joint arthroplasty aligned? Results of a pilot study. HSS J. 2011;7:229-234.
15. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163-173.
16. Healy W, Iorio R, Lemos M. Athletic activity after joint replacement. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:377-388.
17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
18. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754-765.
19. Jourdan C, Poiraudeau S, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P. Comparison of patient and surgeon expectations of total hip arthroplasty. Plos One. 2012;7:e30195-e30195.
20. King DE, Mainous AG III, Carnemolla M, Everett CJ. Adherence to healthy lifestyle habits in US adults, 1988-2006. Am J Med. 2009;122:528-534.
21. Kurtz S, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 to 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487-1497.
22. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-785.
23. Kuster M. Exercise recommendations after total joint replacement: a review of the current literature and proposal of scientifically based guidelines. Sports Med. 2002;32:433-445.
24. Larson EB, Bruce RA. Health benefits of exercise in an aging society. Arch Inter Med. 1987;147:353.
25. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:542-547.
26. Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2073-2078.
27. McGrory B, Stuart M, Sim F. Participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty: review of literature and survey of surgeon preferences. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:342-348.
28. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.
29. Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, ed. Sociology and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC, USA: American Sociological Association; 1965:100-113.
30. Nilsdotter A, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip Disability and osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) - validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10-18.
31. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:55-61.
32. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35-43.
33. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:157-165.
34. Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB. Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:20-32.
35. Papalia R, Del Buono A, Zampogna B, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Sport activity following joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:81-103.
36. Paulsen A, Pedersen A, Overgaar S, Roos EM. Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcomes measures in a registry setting - a cross-sectional study of 6,000 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:321-327.
37. Perruccio AV, Stefan Lohmander L, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Davis AM. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:542-550.
38. Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Bowman DH. Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:876-883.
39. Roos EM, Roos H, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon B. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88-96.
40. Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3-19.
41. Singh JA. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:80-85.
42. Smits N, Zitman FG, Cuijpers P, Hollander-Gijsman ME, Carlier IVE. A proof of principle for using adaptive testing in routine outcome monitoring: the efficiency of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire-Anhedonic Depression CAT. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:1-10.
43. Stampfe MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willet WC. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med. 2000;341:16-22.
44. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon MJ, Mathis KB. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:172-188.
45. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
46. Wright JG. Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't we be asking patients if they are better? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:549-553.
47. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890-895.