Comparison of patient and surgeon expectations of total hip arthroplasty

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Jourdan, Claire ^a,e   Poiraudeau, Serge ^d   Descamps, Stéphane ^b   Nizard, Rémy ^c   Hamadouche, Moussa ^d   Anract, Philippe ^d   Boisgard, Stéphane ^b   Galvin, Myriam ^b   Ravaud, Philippe ^e  

^a RAYMOND POINCARÉ HOSPITAL   (France)

^b SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^c HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^d Institut Cochin   (France)

^e INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXERCISE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; PHYSICIANS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855827205     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030195     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J, (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 963-974.
2. (1995) NIH consensus conference: Total hip replacement. pp. 1950-1956 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Total Hip Replacement. Jun.
3. Kravitz RL, (1996) Patients' expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 53: 3-27.
4. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, et al. (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29: 1273-1279.
5. Groeneveld P, Kwoh C, Mor M, Appelt C, Geng M, et al. (2008) Racial differences in expectations of joint replacement surgery outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 59: 730-737.
6. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA, (2003) Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18: 872-878.
7. Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID, Kinemax Outcomes G, (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1201-1207.
8. Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed N, (2008) Patient Expectations Predict Greater Pain Relief with Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
9. Mancuso C, Jout J, Salvati E, Sculco T, (2009) Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 2073-2078.
10. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB, (2006) The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 35-43.
11. Marcinkowski K, Wong V, Dignam D, (2005) Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs 24: 202-209.
12. Ibrahim SA, Siminoff LA, Burant CJ, Kwoh CK, (2002) Understanding ethnic differences in the utilization of joint replacement for osteoarthritis: the role of patient-level factors. Med Care 40: I44-51.
13. Suarez-Almazor ME, Souchek J, Kelly PA, O'Malley K, Byrne M, et al. (2005) Ethnic variation in knee replacement: patient preferences or uninformed disparity? Arch Intern Med 165: 1117-1124.
14. Toye FM, Barlow J, Wright C, Lamb SE, (2006) Personal meanings in the construction of need for total knee replacement surgery. Soc Sci Med 63: 43-53.
15. Kwoh C, Ibrahim S, (2001) Rheumatology patient and physician concordance with respect to important health and symptom status outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 45: 372-377.
16. Brokelman R, van Loon C, van Susante J, van Kampen A, Veth R, (2008) Patients are more satisfied than they expected after joint arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 74: 59-63.
17. Lieberman J, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas B, et al. (1996) Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78: 835-838.
18. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G, (2003) Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85: 204-206.
19. Street RL Jr, Richardson MN, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME, (2009) (Mis)understanding in patient-health care provider communication about total knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum 61: 100-107.
20. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME, (1997) Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12: 387-396.
21. Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP, (2000) The reliability and validity of the self-reported patient-specific index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 829-837.
22. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M, (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25: 3186-3191.
23. Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, et al. (2008) Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 424-431.
24. Klein GR, Levine BR, Hozack WJ, Strauss EJ, D'Antonio JA, et al. (2007) Return to athletic activity after total hip arthroplasty. Consensus guidelines based on a survey of the Hip Society and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 22: 171-175.
25. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C, (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40: 373-383.
26. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L, (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15: 1833-1840.
27. Tubach F, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Dougados M, et al. (2005) Using patients' and rheumatologists' opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 75-79.
28. Stucki G, Liang MH, Phillips C, Katz JN, (1995) The Short Form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 8: 174-181.
29. Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller S, (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34: 220-233.
30. Bland J, Altman D, (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310.
31. Wright JG, Young NL, (1997) The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 974-983.
32. Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA, Dorey F, (2003) Patients' reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J Arthroplasty 18: 63-68.
33. Meijerink HJ, Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, van Kampen A, de Waal Malefijt MC, (2008) Surgeon's expectations do not predict the outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.