A proof of principle for using adaptive testing in routine Outcome Monitoring: The efficiency of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire -Anhedonic Depression CAT

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Smits, Niels ^a   Zitman, Frans G ^b,c   Cuijpers, Pim ^a   Den Hollander Gijsman, Margien E ^b   Carlier, Ingrid Ve ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Mental Health Institution Rivierduinen   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD DISORDER; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANXIETY DISORDERS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD DISORDERS; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84855502354     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-4     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. Gardner W, Shear K, Kelleher KJ, Pajer KA, Mammen O, Buysse D, Frank E, BMC Psychiatry 2004 4 rticle 13 [DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-4-13]
2. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries J, Bruce B, Rose M, Medical Care 2007 45 3 11 17909380
3. Reducing the length of mental health instruments through structurally incomplete designs. Smits N, Cuijpers P, Beekman ATF, Smit JH, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2007 16 150 160 10.1002/mpr.223 17849433 (Pubitemid 47457075)
4. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. De Beurs E, den Hollander-Gijsman M, Van Rood Y, van Der Wee N, Giltay E, Van Noorden M, Van der Lem R, Van Fenema E, Zitman F, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 2011 18 1 12 10.1002/cpp.696 22282647
5. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. Carlier IVE, Meuldijk D, Van Vliet I, Van Fenema E, Van der Wee N, Zitman F, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2010 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x]
6. Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB, Bjorner JB, Klapp BF, Rose M, Quality of Life Research 2005 14 2277 2291 10.1007/s11136-005-6651-9 16328907 (Pubitemid 41674429)
7. Development of an Item Bank for the Assessment of Depression in Persons With Mental Illnesses and Physical Diseases Using Rasch Analysis. Forkmann T, Boecker M, Norra C, Eberle N, Kircher T, Schauerte P, Mischke K, Westhofen M, Gauggel S, Wirtz M, Rehabilitation Psychology 2009 54 186 197 19469609
8. Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for 'Anxiety' (Anxiety-CAT). Walter OB, Becker J, Bjorner JB, Fliege H, Klapp BF, Rose M, Quality of Life Research 2007 16 143 155 17342455 (Pubitemid 47036921)
9. Watson D, Clark LA, The Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire Iowa City: University of Iowa: Department of Psychology 1991
10. Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the CES-D scale: A Simulation Study. Smits N, Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Psychiatry Research 2011 188 147 155 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.001 21208660
11. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998 59 suppl 20 22 57 9881538
12. A tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Clark LA, Watson D, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1991 100 316 336 1918611
13. The tripartite model for assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression: Psychometrics of the Dutch version of the mood and anxiety symptoms questionnaire. De Beurs E, den Hollander-Gijsman M, Helmich S, Zitman F, Behaviour Research and Therapy 2007 45 7 1609 1617 10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.004 16959211 (Pubitemid 46669430)
14. Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to Educational Problems. Weiss DJ, Kingsbury GG, Journal of Educational Measurement 1984 21 361 375 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01040.x
15. Wainer H, Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2 2000
16. Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded resonses. Samejima F, Psychometrika Monograph Supplement No. 17 1969
17. Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Mellenbergh GJ, Applied Psychological Measurement 1995 19 91 100 10.1177/014662169501900110
18. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA, Thissen D, Revicki DA, Weiss DJ, Hambleton RK, Liu H, Gershon R, Reise SP, Lai J, Cella D, Medical Care 2007 45 22 31 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 17443115
19. Embretson S, Reise SP, Item Response Theory for Psychologists Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2000
20. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data mining, inference and prediction New York: Springer 2001
21. Cross-validation choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Stone M, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1974 36 111 147
22. McDonald RP, Test Theory: A Unified Treatment Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1999
23. Thissen D, MULTILOG User's Guide Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software 1991
24. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2010 http://www.R-project.org [ISBN 3-900051-07-0]
25. Measures of clinical significance. Kraemer H, Morgan G, Leech N, Gliner J, Vaske J, Harmon R, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2003 42 12 1524 10.1097/00004583-200312000-00022 14627890 (Pubitemid 39585985)
26. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Zweig MH, Campbell G, Clinical Chemistry 1993 39 561 577 8472349 (Pubitemid 23118304)
27. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, LISREL 8.8 for Windows Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software 2006
28. ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Theory Analyses. Rizopoulos D, Journal of Statistical Software 2006 17 5 1 25
29. Rizopoulos D, The ltm Package: Latent trait models under IRT 2007 [Library of the R package]
30. Fox J, The polycor Package: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations 2007 [Library of the R package]
31. Mokken scale analysis in R. Van der Ark LA, Journal of Statistical Software 2007 20 11 1 19 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i11/paper
32. Van der Ark LA, Package 'mokken' 2009 [Library of the R package] 22446512
33. lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations. Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK, Journal of Statistical Software 2011 39 8 1 30 21572908
34. Choi SW, Package 'lordif' 2011 [Library of the R package] 22282574
35. Technical Guidelines for Assessing Computerized Adaptive Tests. Green BF, Bock RD, Humphreys LG, Linn RL, Reckase MD, Journal of Educational Measurement 1984 21 347 360 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01039.x
36. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Kraemer HC, Kupfer DJ, Biological Psychiatry 2006 59 990 996 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014 16368078 (Pubitemid 43849650)
37. An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Kocalevent RD, Rose M, Becker J, Walter OB, Fliege H, Bjorner JB, Kleiber D, Klapp BF, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009 62 278 287 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.003 18639439
38. Stochastic curtailment of health questionnaires: A method to reduce respondent burden. Finkelman M, He Y, Kim W, Lai A, Statistics in Medicine 2011 30 1989 2004 10.1002/sim.4231 21520454
39. Computerized adaptive personality assessment: An illustration with the absorption scale. Waller NG, Reise SP, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989 57 1051 1058 2614658
40. Item selection in computerized classification testing. Thompson N, Educational and Psychological Measurement 2009 69 5 778 10.1177/0013164408324460
41. Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Finkelman M, Weiss D, Kim-Kang G, Applied Psychological Measurement 2010 34 4 238 254 10.1177/0146621609344844
42. Expanding test-retest designs to include developmental time-lag components. McArdle JJ, Woodcock RW, Psychological Methods 1997 2 403 435 (Pubitemid 127453679)
43. Reducing test length through structurally incomplete designs: An Illustration. Smits N, Vorst HCM, Learning and Individual Differences 2007 17 25 34 10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.005
44. Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Dillman DA, Sinclair MD, Clark JR, Public Opinion Quarterly 1993 57 289 304 10.1086/269376
45. The partial questionnaire design for case-control studies. Wacholder S, Carroll RJ, Pee D, Gail MH, Statistics in Medicine 1994 13 623 634 10.1002/sim.4780130523 8023038 (Pubitemid 24106742)
46. Bollen K, Structural Equations with Latent Variables New York: John Wiley 1989
47. Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and Implications. Reckase MD, Journal of Educational Statistics 1979 4 207 230
48. Hambleton RK, Principles and selected applications of Item Response Theory New York: American Council on Education 3 1988 147 200
49. Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Yen WM, Journal of Educational Measurement 1993 30 187 213 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x
50. Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2 1988
51. Mokken RJ, A theory and procedure of scale analysis The Hague: Mouton 1971
52. A comparison of several goodness-of-fit statistics. McKinley RL, Mills CN, Applied Psychological Measurement 1985 9 49 57 10.1177/014662168500900105
53. Holland PW, Wainer H, Differential Item Functioning Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 1993
54. Differential Item Functioning Analysis With Ordinal Logistic Regression Techniques. Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Jolley L, van Belle G, Medical Care 2006 44 115 23 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed 17060818 (Pubitemid 44632037)