Spatiotemporal simulation and risk analysis of dam-break flooding based on cellular automata

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2043-2059

  Li, Yi ^a,b   Gong, Jianhua ^a,b   Zhu, Jun ^c   Song, Yiquan ^d   Hu, Ya ^c   Ye, Lei ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b Zhejiang CAS Application Center for Geoinformatics   (China)

^c SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d TIANJIN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Barrier Lake; cellular automata; dam break; hydraulics of open channels; spatiotemporal scale

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAM; FLOODING; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGY; OPEN CHANNEL FLOW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84885948880     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.786081     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Al-Fuagara, A., et al., 2008. The application of hydraulic model with GIS for visual floodplain mapping: a case study of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia. International Conference on Construction and Building Technologies (ICCBT), 2008-D, pp. 273-282.
2. Bates, P.D. and De Roo, A.P.J., 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 236 (1-2), 54-77.
3. Bitelli, G., et al., 2004. Image change detection on urban areas: the earthquake case. Proceedings of the 20th International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 12-23 July 2004, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 692.
4. Coninx, I. and Bachus, K., 2008. Social flood risk assessment - Methodological paper for the ADAPT project. Leuven, KUL, 25.
5. Dong, J.J., et al., 2011. Logistic regression model for predicting the failure probability of a landslide dam. Engineering Geology, 117, 52-61.
6. Dottori, F. and Todini, E., 2011. Developments of a flood inundation model based on the cellular automata approach: testing different methods to improve model performance. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 266-280.
7. Ermini, L. and Gasagli, N., 2003. Prediction of the behaviour of landslide dams using a geomorphological dimensionless index. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28, 31-47.
8. Ernst, J., et al., 2009. Social flood impacts in urban areas: integration of detailed flow modelling and social analysis. In: Proc. 33rd IAHR congress - water engineering for a sustainable environment. Vancouver, British Columbia, IAHR, pp. 6820-6827.
9. Ernst, J., et al., 2010. Micro-scale flood risk analysis based on detailed 2D hydraulic modelling and high resolution geographic data. Natural Hazards, 55, 181-209.
10. European Parliament: European Parliament Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council On the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks (12131/6/2006 - C6-0038/2007-2006/0005(COD)) (Codecision procedure: second reading), 2007.
11. Gao, P. and Mu, X.M., 2005. Comparative experiment of soil infiltration of different land use patterns in loess hilly region. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 3 (4), 27-31.
12. Gilbert, F.W., 1945. Human Adjustment to Floods. University of Chicago Department of Geography Research Paper No. 29 (Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Geography).
13. Goodchild, M.F. and Glennon, A., 2008. Representation and computation of geographic dynamics. In: K.S. Hornsby and M. Yuan, eds. Understanding dynamics of geographic domains. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 13-30.
14. Hong, Y., Adler, R., and Verdin, J., 2007. Use of 21st century satellite remote sensing technology in natural hazard analysis. Natural Hazards, 43 (2), 165-166.
15. Hossain, A.K.M.A., Jia, Y.F., and Chao, C.B., 2009. Estimation of Manning's roughness coefficient distribution for hydrodynamic model using remotely sensed land cover features, 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, 635-638.
16. Jonkman, S.N., Kok, M., and Vrijling, J.K., 2003. Economic optimization as a basis for choice of flood protection strategies in the Netherlands. International association for XXX IAHR Congress, August, 2003, Auth,Thessalon, Greece, 19-26.
17. Jonkman, S.N., Vrijling, J.K., and Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., 2008. Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Natural Hazards, 46, 353-389.
18. Li, Y., et al., 2012. Efficient dam break flood simulation methods for developing a preliminary evacuation plan after the Wenchuan Earthquake. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12 (1), 97-106.
19. Mostert, E. and Junier, S.J., 2009. The European flood risk directive: challenges for research. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 6, 4961-4988.
20. Murray, A.B. and Paola, C., 1994. A cellular model of braided rivers. Nature, 371 (1), 54-57.
21. Parsons, J.A. and Fonstad, M.A., 2007. A cellular automata model of surface water flow. Hydrological Processes, 2195, 2189-2195.
22. Penning-Rowsell, E., et al., 2003. The benefits of flood and coastal defence: Techniques and data for 2003. London: Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University).
23. Penning-Rowsell, E. and Wilson, T., 2006. Gauging the impact of natural hazards: the pattern and cost of emergency response during flood events. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31 (2), 9-15.
24. Rinaldi, P.R., et al., 2007. Cellular automata algorithm for simulation of surface flows in large plains. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15 (3), 315-327.
25. Rose, A., et al., 2007. Benefit-Cost Analysis of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grants. Natural Hazards Review, 8 (4), 97-111.
26. Scawthorn, C., et al., 2006, HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology. II. Damage and Loss Assessment, Natural Hazards Review, 7, SPECIAL ISSUE: Multihazards Loss Estimation and HAZUS, 72-81.
27. Song, Y.Q., et al., 2013. Crowd evacuation simulation for bioterrorism in micro-spatial environments based on virtual geographic environments. Safety Science, 53, 105-113.
28. Van De Wiel, M.J., et al., 2007. Embedding reach-scale fluvial dynamics within the CAESAR cellular automaton landscape evolution model. Geomorphology, 90 (3-4), 283-301.
29. Van Der Knijff, J.M., Younis, J., and De Roo, A.P.J., 2010. LISFLOOD: a GIS-based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (2), 189-212.
30. Waarts, P.H., 1992. Method for determining loss of life caused by inundation, Report TNO, B-91-1099 (in Dutch).
31. White, R. and Engelen, G., 2000. High resolution integrated modeling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24 (5), 383-400.
32. Yang, J.L., Zhang, G.L., and Yuan, D.G., 2008. Characteristics of water infiltration in urban soils of Nanjing City. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19 (2), 263-268.
33. Yu, C.Q., et al., 2012. A GIS-supported impact assessment of the hierarchical flood-defense systems on the plain areas of the Taihu Basin, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (4), 643-665.
34. Yu, J., et al., 2011. Cellular automata-based spatial multicriteria land suitability simulation for irrigated agriculture. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (1), 131-148.
35. Yu, C. and Peuquet, D.J., 2009. A geoagent-based framework for knowledge-oriented representation: embracing social rules in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23, 923-960.