Cellular automata-based spatial multi-criteria land suitability simulation for irrigated agriculture

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 131-148

  Yu, Jia ^a,b   Chen, Yun ^c,d   Wu, Jianping ^a   Khan, Shahbaz ^e  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

^d Cooperative Research Centre or Irrigation Futures ^*  (Australia)

^e UNESCO Division of Water Sciences   (France)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy procedure; Cellular automata; GIS; Multi criteria evaluation; Suitability simulation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARC-INFO; ARCVIEW; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; IRRIGATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIAL DATA;

AUSTRALIA; MACINTYRE RIVER;

EID: 79951764176     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658811003785571     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anagnostopoulos, K.P., Vavatsikos, A.P., Spiropoulos, N., and Kraias, I., 2010. Land suitability analysis for natural wastewater treatment systems using a new GIS add-in for supporting criterion weight elicitation methods. Operational Research, 10 (1), 91-108.
2. Barredo, J., et al., 2003. Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64 (3), 145-160.
3. Batty, M., Xie, Y., and Sun, Z., 1999. Modelling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23 (3), 205-233.
4. Boroushaki, S. and Malczewski, J., 2008. Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Computers and Geosciences, 34 (4), 399-410.
5. Carver, S.J., 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (3), 321-339.
6. Cecchini, A., 1996. Urban modeling by means of cellular automata: generalized urban automata with the help on-line (AUGH) model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23 (6), 721-732.
7. Chen, Y., Khan, S., and Paydar, Z., 2010. To retire or expand? A fuzzy GIS-based spatial multi-criteria evaluation framework for irrigated agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage, 59 (2), 174-188.
8. Clarke, K.C. and Gaydos, L.J., 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automata model and GIS: long term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (7), 699-714.
9. Corona, P., et al., 2008. Land suitability for short rotation coppices assessed through fuzzy membership functions. In:R. Lafortezza, et al., eds. Patterns and processes in forest landscapes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 191-211.
10. Cram, S., et al., 2006. Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico's Tamaulipas State for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Management, 80 (1), 13-24.
11. Eastman, J.R., 1997. Idrisi for Windows, Version 2.0: tutorial exercises. Worcester, MA: Graduate School of Geography - Clark University.
12. ESRI, 2008. Introduction to ArcGIS Desktop and ArcGIS Engine development [online]. Available from: http://www.esri.com [Accessed 23 October 08].
13. FAO, 1976. A frame work for land evaluation (Soils Bulletin No. 32). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
14. Geertman, S. and Stillwell, J., 2004. Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28 (4), 291-310.
15. Giordano, L.C. and Riedel, P.S., 2008. Multi-criteria spatial decision analysis for demarcation of greenway: a case study of the city of Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84 (3-4), 301-311.
16. Goodchild, M.F., 2000. The current status of GIS and spatial analysis. Geographical Systems, 2 (1), 5-10.
17. Gray, L., 2003. A mathematician looks at Wolfram's new kind of science. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50 (2), 200-211.
18. Harris, G.A., 1986. Soil limitations of irrigated cropping on Macintyre Brook. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Project Report Q086017.
19. Hopkins, L., 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation. Journal for American Institute of Planners, 34 (1), 19-29.
20. Hossain, M.S., et al., 2007. Multi-criteria evaluation approach to GIS-based land-suitability classification for tilapia farming in Bangladesh. Aquaculture International, 15 (6), 425-443.
21. Hossain, M.S. and Das, N.G., 2010. GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to land suitability modeling for giant prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farming in Companigonj Upazila of Noakhali, Bangladesh. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 70 (1), 172-180.
22. Hübner, R. and Günther, H.O., 2007. Using AHP for strategic production site assessment: a case study from specialty chemicals industry. In: H.O. Günther, D.C. Mattfeld and L. Suhl, eds. Management logistischer netzwerke, entscheidungsunterstützung, informationssysteme und OR-tools. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 3-22.
23. Joerin, F., Thériault, M., and Musy, A., 2001. Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for landuse suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (2), 153-174.
24. Kalogirou, S., 2002. Expert systems and GIS: an application of land suitability evaluation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26 (2-3), 89-112.
25. Li, X., Yang, Q., and Liu, X., 2008. Discovering and evaluating urban signatures for simulating compact development using cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86 (2), 177 186.
26. Li, X. and Yeh, A., 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (4), 323-343.
27. Littleboy, M., Smith, D.M., and Bryant, M.J., 1996. Simulation modelling to determine suitability of agricultural land. Ecological Modelling, 86 (2-3), 219-225.
28. Liu, X., Li, X., and Yeh, A., 2007. Discovery of transition rules for geographical cellular automata by using ant colony optimization. Science in China (Series D), 50 (10), 1578-1588.
29. Liu, X., et al., 2008a. A bottom-up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (11), 1147-1169.
30. Liu, X., et al., 2008b. Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata. Ecological Modelling, 211 (1-2), 169-181.
31. Malcolmson, G.H. and Lloyd, P.L., 1977. Inglewood Shire Handbook: an inventory of the agricultural resources and production of Inglewood Shire, Queensland, Brisbane: Queensland Department of Primary Industries.
32. Malczewski, J., 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning, 62 (1), 3-65.
33. Malczewski, J., et al., 2003. GIS multicriteria evaluation with ordered weighted averaging (OWA): case study of developing watershed management strategies. Environment and Planning A, 35 (10), 1769-1784.
34. Malczewski, J. and Rinner, C., 2005. Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: a case study of residential quality evaluation. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7 (2), 249-268.
35. McHarg, I.L., 1969. Design with nature. New York: Wiley.
36. Nijs, T.de, Niet, R.De, and Crommentuijn, L., 2004. Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030. Journal of Environmental Management, 72 (1-2), 35-42.
37. Phan, J., 2004. MATLAB C# Book. Colorado: LePhan Publishing.
38. Reshmidevi, T.V., Eldho, T.I., and Jana, R., 2009. A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds. Agricultural Systems, 101 (1-2), 101-109.
39. Robinson, D.T., et al., 2007. Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science. Journal of Land Use Science, 2 (1), 31-55.
40. Saaty, T.L., 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15 (3), 234-281.
41. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, setting priorities, resource allocation. New York: McGraw Hill International Book Cooperation.
42. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G., 1991. Prediction, projection and forecasting. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
43. Sicat, R.S., Carranza, E.J.M., and Nidumolu, U.B., 2005. Fuzzy modeling of farmers' knowledge for land suitability classification. Agricultural Systems, 83 (1), 49-75.
44. Store, R. and Kangas, J., 2001. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55 (2), 79-93.
45. Tiwari, D.N., Loof, R., and Paudyalc, G.N., 1999. Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques. Agricultural Systems, 60 (2), 99-112.
46. Wang, F. and Hall, G.B., and Subaryono, 1990. Fuzzy information representation and processing in conventional GIS software: database design and applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 4 (3), 261-283.
47. White, R. and Engelen, G., 2000. High resolution integrated modeling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24 (5), 383 400.
48. Wu, F., 2002. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban and conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (8), 795-818.
49. Wu, F. and Webster, C.J., 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25 (1), 103-126.
50. Yager, R.R., 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18 (1), 183-190.
51. Yang, Q.S., Li, X., and Shi, X., 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers and Geosciences, 34 (6), 592-602.