Representation and Computation of Geographic Dynamics

Understanding Dynamics of Geographic Domains

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 13-30

  Goodchild, Michael F ^a   Glennon, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85133991954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420060355-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Ahearn, S. and J.L.D. Smith. 2005. Modeling the interaction between humans and animals in multiple-use forests: A case study of Panthera tigris. In GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling, ed. D. J. Maguire, M. Batty, and M. F. Goodchild, 387-402. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
2. Arctur, D. and M. Zeiler. 2004. Designing geodatabases: Case studies in GIS data modeling. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
3. Batty, M. 2005. Approaches to modeling in GIS: Spatial representation and temporal dynamics. In GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling, ed. D. J. Maguire, M. Batty, and M. F. Goodchild, 41-61. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
4. Bennett, D. A. 1997. A framework for the integration of geographical information systems and modelbase management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11(4):337-57.
5. Burrough, P. A., D. Karssenberg, and W. van Deursen. 2005. Environmental modeling with PCRaster. In GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling, ed. D. J. Maguire, M. Batty, and M. F. Goodchild, 333-56. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
6. Carey, G.F., ed. 1995. Finite element modeling of environmental problems: surface and subsurface flow and transport. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
7. Clarke, K. C., S. Hoppen, and L. Gaydos. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B 24:247-61.
8. Fotheringham, A. S. and M. E. O’Kelly. 1989. Spatial interaction models: formulations and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
9. Galton, A. and M. F. Worboys. 2005. Processes and events in dynamic geo-networks. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Geospatial Semantics, GeoS 2005, ed. M. Rodriguez, I. Cruz, S. Levashkin, and M. J. Egenhofer, 45-59. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3799. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10. Goodchild, M. F. 1988. Stepping over the line: Technological constraints and the new cartography. American Cartographer 15:311-19.
11. Goodchild, M. F. 2004. GIScience, geography, form, and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(4):709-14.
12. Goodchild, M. F., M. Yuan, and T. J. Cova. 2007. Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21(3):239-60.
13. Kemp, K. K. 1997. Fields as a framework for integrating GIS and environmental process models. Part one: Representing spatial continuity. Transactions in GIS 1(3):219-34.
14. Kemp, K. K. 1997. Fields as a framework for integrating GIS and environmental process models. Part two: Specifying field variables. Transactions in GIS 1(3):235-46.
15. Kwan, M.-P. and J. Lee. 2004. Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: A time-geographic approach. In Spatially Integrated Social Science, ed. M. F. Goodchild and D. G. Janelle, 48-66. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. de Smith, M. J., M. F. Goodchild, and P. A. Longley. 2007. Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. Winchelsea: Winchelsea Press. http://www.spatialanalysisonline.com.
17. Sui, D. Z. 2004. Tobler’s First Law of Geography: A big idea for a small world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(2): 269-77.
18. Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography 46:234-40.
19. Tomlin, C. D. 1990. Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Tufte, E. R. 1983. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
21. Ungerer, M. J. and M. F. Goodchild. 2002. Integrating spatial data analysis and GIS: A new implementation using the Component Object Model (COM). International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16(1):41-54.
22. van Deursen, W.P.A. 1995. Geographical information systems and dynamic models: development and application of a prototype spatial modelling language. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
23. Vckovski, A. 1998. Interoperable and distributed processing in GIS. London: Taylor and Francis.
24. White, R., B. Straatman, and G. Engelen. 2004. Planning scenario visualization and assessment. In Spatially Integrated Social Science, ed. M. F. Goodchild and D. G. Janelle, 420-42. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Yuan, M. 1999. Representing geographic information to enhance GIS support for complex spatiotemporal queries. Transactions in GIS 3(2):137-60.
26. Yuan, M. 2001. Representing complex geographic phenomena with both object- and field-like properties. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(2):83-96.