Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 111, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 736-742

  Trepte, C J C ^a   Eichhorn, V ^a   Haas, S A ^a   Stahl, K ^a   Schmid, F ^a   Nitzschke, R ^a   Goetz, A E ^a   Reuter, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

dynamic haemodynamic monitoring; heart lung interaction; volume responsiveness

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY PRESSURE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MAJOR SURGERY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; OPERATION DURATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESPIRATORY SYSTOLIC VARIATION TEST; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME; VENTILATED PATIENT; VOLUME RESPONSIVENESS; YOUDEN INDEX;

EID: 84885923598     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet204     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 96-103
2. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-Analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1392-402
3. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77
4. Bellamy MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 755-7
5. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA,Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259-65
6. Gelman S. Venous function and central venous pressure: A physiologic story. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 735-48
7. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-8
8. Michard F. Volume management using dynamic parameters: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Chest 2005; 128: 1902-3
9. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferre A, et al. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 152-7
10. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15: R85
11. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1672-9
12. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476-80
13. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, et al. Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: The respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 942-5
14. Preisman S, KoganS, Berkenstadt H, PerelA. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functionalhaemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-55
15. Eichhorn V, Trepte C, Richter HP, et al. Respiratory systolic variation test in acutely impaired cardiac function for predicting volume responsiveness in pigs. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 659-64
16. Pizov R, Ya'ari Y, Perel A. The arterial pressure waveform during acute ventricular failure and synchronized external chest compression. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 150-6
17. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21
18. Preisman S, DiSegni E, Vered Z, Perel A. Left ventricular preload and function during graded haemorrhage and retranfusion in pigs: Analysis of arterial pressure waveform and correlation with echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 716-8
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45
20. YoudenWJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3: 32-5
21. Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, et al. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 346-51
22. Yu YH, Dai HW, Yan ML, et al. An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2009; 21: 463-5
23. Zhang HM, Liu DW, Wang XT, et al. Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2010; 49: 610-3
24. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
25. DeBacker D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
26. Vallee F, Richard JC, Mari A, et al. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1004-10
27. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Anesth 2011; 25: 904-16
28. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Invasive measures of left ventricular preload. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 235-40
29. The Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNetwork.Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301-8
30. NeedhamDM,Colantuoni E,Mendez-TellezPA, et al. Lungprotective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344: E2124
31. Uttman L, Bitzen U, De Robertis E, et al. Protective ventilation in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome after ventilatorinduced lung injury: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 584-94
32. Jardin F, Genevray B, Brun-Ney D, Bourdarias JP. Influence of lung and chest wall compliances on transmission of airway pressure to the pleural space in critically ill patients. Chest 1985; 88: 653-8
33. Spieth PM, Gama de Abreu M. Lung recruitment in ARDS: We are still confused, but on a higher PEEP level. Crit Care 2012; 16: 108
34. de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, et al. How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care 2012; 16: R4
35. Trof RJ, Sukul SP, Twisk JW, Girbes AR, Groeneveld AB. Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 697-701
36. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 591-7