Individualized decision-making in IVF: Calculating the chances of pregnancy

Human Reproduction

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2972-2980

  Van Loendersloot, L L ^a   Van Wely, M ^a   Repping, S ^a   Bossuyt, P M M ^a   Van Der Veen, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

assisted reproduction; IVF ICSI outcome; prediction model; pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; OOCYTE DONATION; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY;

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS;

ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; IVF/ICSI OUTCOME; PREDICTION MODEL; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE;

EID: 84885904502     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det315     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AIHW. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand, 2007. http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id? 6442458973 (20 April 2013, date last accessed).
2. Bancsi LF, Huijs AM, den Ouden CT, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Blankenstein MA, te Velde ER. Basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels are of limited value in predicting ongoing pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2000;3:552-557.
3. Banerjee P, Choi B, Shahine LK, Jun SH, O'Leary K, Lathi RB,Westphal LM, Wong WH, YaoMW. Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;31:13570-13575.
4. Bouckaert A, Psalti I, Loumaye E, deCoomanS, Thomas K. The probability of a successful treatment of infertility by in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994;3:448-455.
5. Campbell D, Meikle J. £20bn NHS cuts are hitting patients, Guardian investigation reveals. The Guardian 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/ 2011/oct/17/nhs-cuts-impact-on-patients-revealed (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
6. Carrera-Rotllan J, Estrada-Garcia L, Sarquella-Ventura J. Prediction of pregnancy in IVF cycles on the fourth day of ovarian stimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;9:387-394.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2007 Assisted Reproductive Technology Report. 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2007/PDF/ COMPLETE-2007-ART.pdf (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
8. Commenges-Ducos M, Tricaud S, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Dallay D, Horovitz J, Commenges D. Modelling of the probability of success of the stages of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: Stimulation, fertilization and implantation. Hum Reprod 1998;1:78-83.
9. Coppus SF, van der Veen F, Opmeer BC, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM. Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod 2009; 8:1774-1778.
10. deMouzon J, GoossensV, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, FerrarettiAP, KorsakV, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010;8:1851-1862.
11. deMouzon J, GoossensV, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, FerrarettiAP, KorsakV, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Andersen AN. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2007: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2012;4:954-966.
12. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Good clinical treatment in assisted reproduction-an ESHRE position paper 2008 http://www.eshre.eu/binarydata.aspx?type=doc&sessionId=yyggl ojxjtmhjv5555k2peat/Good-Clinical-treatment-in-Assisted-Reproduc tion-ENGLISH-new.pdf (21 April 2012, date last accessed). European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
13. ART Fact Sheet. 2010. http://www.eshre.eu/ESHRE/English/Guidelines- Legal/ART-fact-sheet/page.aspx/1061 (21 April 2012, date last accessed)
14. Farquhar CM, van den Boogaard NM, Riddell C, Macdonald A, Chan E, Mol BW. Accessing fertility treatment in New Zealand: A comparison of the clinical priority access criteria with a prediction model for couples with unexplained subfertility. Hum Reprod 2011;11:3037-3044.
15. Ferlitsch K, Sator MO, Gruber DM, Rucklinger E, Gruber CJ, Huber JC. Body mass index, follicle-stimulating hormone and their predictive value in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;12:431-436.
16. Greenland S, Finkle WD. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 12:1255-1264.
17. Haan G, Bernardus RE, Hollanders JM, Leerentveld RA, Prak FM, Naaktgeboren N. Results of IVF from a prospective multicentre study. Hum Reprod 1991;6:805-810.
18. Hamberger L, Lundin K, Sjogren A, Soderlund B. Indications for intracytoplasmic sperminjection.HumReprod 1998;13 (Suppl. 1):128-133.
19. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). A long term analysis of the HFEA Register data 1991-2006. 2007. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Latest- long-term-data-analysis-report-91-06.pdf (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
20. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Fertility treatment in 2010: Trends and figures. 2010. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2011- 11-16-Annual-Register-Figures-Report-final.pdf (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
21. Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, Bergh T. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod 2007;2:548-557.
22. Hughes EG, King C,Wood EC. A prospective study of prognostic factors in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989;5:838-844.
23. Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, Coulson C, Lambert PA, Watt EM, Desai KM. Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985; 6510:1693-1697.
24. HunaultCC, EijkemansMJ, PietersMH, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;4:725-732.
25. Karp I, Abrahamowicz M, Bartlett G, Pilote L. Updated risk factor values and the ability of the multivariable risk score to predict coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol 2004;7:707-716.
26. Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Bossuyt PM, Eijkemans MJ, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Hompes PG. Prediction models in reproductive medicine: A critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2009;5:537-552.
27. Lintsen AM, Eijkemans MJ, Hunault CC, Bouwmans CA, Hakkaart L, Habbema JD, Braat DD. Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: A national prospective study. Hum Reprod 2007;9: 2455-2462.
28. Meeus T, Stokmans D. Regeerakkoord: miljardenbezuinigingen op zorg, sociale zekerheid en overheid. NRC 2012. http://www.nrc.nl/verkiezingen/2012/10/ 29/regeerakkoord-miljarden bezuinigingen-opzorg- sociale-zekerheid-en-overheid/ (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
29. Minaretzis D, Harris D, Alper MM, Mortola JF, Berger MJ, Power D. Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of successful live births in in vitro fertilization (IVF) suggests strategies to improve IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;6:365-371.
30. Moragianni VA, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:189-192.
31. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and National Collaborating Centre forWomen's, CH. Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. 2004. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/ uploadedfiles/NEBFertilityFull.pdf (21 April 2012, date last accessed)
32. Nayudu PL, Gook DA, Hepworth G, Lopata A, Johnston WI. Prediction of outcome in human in vitro fertilization based on follicular and stimulation response variables. Fertil Steril 1989;1:117-125.
33. Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: A prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med 2011;1:e1000386
34. NVOG (Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology). Indications for IVF 'Indicaties voor IVF'. NVOG Guideline no. 9, 1998. http://www.nvogdocumenten. nl/uploaded/docs/09-indicaties-ivf.pdf (21 April 2013, date last accessed)
35. NVOG (Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology). Guideline-Basic fertility work-up. NVOG Guideline no.1, 2004. http://www.nvogdocumenten. nl/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/item/pagina.php&id=23735 &richtlijn-id= 518 (21 April 2013, date last accessed)
36. Ottosen LD, Kesmodel U, Hindkjaer J, Ingerslev HJ. Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients-do we need more information? J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;1:29-36.
37. Pelinck MJ, Vogel NE, Hoek A, Arts EG, Simons AH, Heineman MJ. Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH: A pilot study. Hum Reprod 2005;3:642-648.
38. Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 1987;8: 705-708.
39. Rappeport A. US healthcare groups braced for budget cuts. Financial Times 2012. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fbd99bf8-ffbc-11e1-831d-00 144feabdc0.html#axzz2RPkN7ysP (21 April 2012, date last accessed).
40. Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;5:839-854.
41. Repping S, vanWeert JM, Mol BW, de Vries JW, van der Veen F. Use of the total motile sperm count to predict total fertilization failure in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2002;1:22-28.
42. Steures P et al. Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;1:45-51.
43. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. A Practical Approach to Development, Validation and Updating. NY, USA: Springer, 2009.
44. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE Jr, Habbema JD. Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: In search of a sensible strategy in small data sets. Med Decis Making 2001;1:45-56.
45. Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJ, van Houwelingen HC, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: A study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med 2004;16: 2567-2586.
46. Stolwijk AM, Zielhuis GA, Hamilton CJ, Straatman H, Hollanders JM, Goverde HJ, van Dop PA, Verbeek AL. Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value. Hum Reprod 1996; 10:2298-2303.
47. Stolwijk AM,Wetzels AM, Braat DD. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod 2000;1:203-209.
48. Templeton A, Morris JK, ParslowW. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet 1996;9039:1402-1406.
49. Toll DB, Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Moons KG. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;11:1085-1094.
50. van den Boogaard NM, Musters AM, Bruhl SW, Tankens T, Kremer JA, Mol BW, Hompes PG, Nelen WL, van der Veen F. Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators. Hum Reprod 2012;4:1050-1057.
51. van Loendersloot LL, vanWely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010;6:577-589.
52. vanWeertJM,Repping S, vander Steeg JW, SteuresP, vanderVeen F,MolBW. Apredictionmodel forongoing pregnancy after in vitrofertilizationin couples with male subfertility. J ReprodMed 2008.4.250-256.
53. Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Macklon NS, Heijnen EM, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of low response to mild ovarian stimulation initiated on cycle day 5 for IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;7:1919-1924.