Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment

Lancet

Volumn 348, Issue 9039, 1996, Pages 1402-1406

  Templeton, Allan ^a,c   Morris, Joan K ^b   Parslow, William ^a  

^a Hum Fertilisation/Embryol Auth   (United Kingdom)

^b ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GAMETE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; OOCYTE DONATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030599530     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05291-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. 1 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Fifth Annual Report. 1996.
2. 2 Anon. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 13-21.
3. 3 FIVNAT. Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French national registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 746-55.
4. 4 Kovacs GT. The likelihood of pregnancy with IVF and GIFT in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust 1993; 158: 805-07.
5. 5 Baird DT. Assisted conception on the NHS? BMJ 1992; 305: 204-05.
6. 6 Healy DL, Trounson AO, Andersen AN. Female infertilty: causes and treatment. Lancet 1994; 343: 1539-44.
7. 7 Neumann PJ, Gharib SD, Weinstein MC. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 239-43.
8. 8 Callahan TL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, et al. The economic impact of multiple gestational pregnancies and the contribution of assisted reproduction techniques to their incidence. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 244-49.
9. 9 Collins JA, Bustillo M, Visscher RD, Lawrence LD. An estimate of the cost of in virto fertilzation services in the United States in 1995. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 538-45.
10. 10 The management of subfertility. Effective Health Care 1992; 3: 1-24.
11. 11 Kenny DT. In vitro fertilisation and gamete intrafallopian transfer: an integrative analysis of research. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 317-25.
12. 12 Buitendijk SE. Evidence-based in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 1995; 346: 901.
13. 13 Chapko KM, Weaver MR, Chapko MK, Pasta D, Adamson GD. Stability of in vitro fertilization embryo transfer success rates from the 1989, 1990, and 1991: clinic-specific outcome assessments. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 757-63.
14. 14 Hull MG, Eddowes HA, Fahy U, et al. Expectations of assisted conception for infertility. BMJ 1992; 304: 1465-69.
15. 15 Tan SL, Royston P, Campbell S, et al. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 1992; 339: 1390-94.
16. 16 Jansen RPS. Elusive fertility: fecundability and assisted conception in perspective. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 252-54.
17. 17 Collins JA, Burrows EA, Wilan AR. The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 22-28.
18. 18 Royston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parasimonious parametric modelling. Appl Stat 1994; 43: 429-67.
19. 19 Wilcosky T, Chambless L. A comparison of direct adjustment and regression adjustment of epidemiological measures. J Chron Dis 1985; 38: 849-56.
20. 20 Roseboom TJ, Wermeiden JPW, Schoute E, Lens JW, Schats R. The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patients, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 3035-41.
21. 21 Abdalla HI, Burton G, Kirkland A, et al. Age, pregnancy and miscarriage: uterine versus ovarian factors. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1512-17.
22. 22 Yaron Y, Botchan A, Amit A, et al. Endometrial receptivity: the age related decline in pregnancy rates and the effect of ovarian function. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 314-18.
23. 23 Edwards RG. Why are agonadal and postamenorrhoeic women so fertile after oocyte donation? Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 733-34.
24. 24 Collins JA, Milner RA, Rowe TC. The effect of treatment on pregnancy among couples with unexplained infertility. Int J Fertil 1991; 36: 140-41.
25. 25 Van Steirtegheim AC, Liu J, Joris H, et al. Higher success rates by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination: a report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1055-60.
26. 26 Simon C, Gutierrez A, Vidal A, et al. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 725-29.
27. 27 Check JH, Lurie D, Callan C, Baker A, Benfer K. Comparison of the cumulative probability of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer by infertility factor and age. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 257-61.
28. 28 Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 861-63.
29. 29 Mackenna AI, Zeger-Hochschild F, Fernandez EO, et al. Fertilization rate in couples with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 223-26.
30. 30 Azem F, Botchan A, Yaron Y, et al. Outcome of donor versus husband insemination in couples with unexplained infertility treated by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1088-91.
31. 31 Tan SL, Doyle P, Maconochie N, et al. Pregnancy and birth rates of live infants after in vitro fertilization in women with and without previous in vitro fertilization pregnancies: a study of eight thousand cycles at one center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 34-40.