Association between body mass index and quality of split bowel preparation

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1478-1485

  Fayad, Nabil F ^a,b   Kahi, Charles J ^a,b   Abd El Jawad, Khaled H ^a   Shin, Andrea S ^a   Shah, Shenil ^a   Lane, Kathleen A ^a   Imperiale, Thomas F ^a,b,c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RICHARD L ROUDEBUSH VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adenoma Detection; Colonoscopy Preparation; Colorectal Cancer Screening; Overweight

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; NARCOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMENTIA; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG USE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTESTINE PREPARATION; IRON THERAPY; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; SPLIT BOWEL PREPARATION; UNITED STATES;

ADENOMA DETECTION; BMI; BODY MASS INDEX; CI; COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION; COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTERIZED PATIENT RECORD SYSTEM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CPRS; ODDS RATIO; OR; OVERWEIGHT; VAMC; VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER;

AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIANA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84885854796     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.037     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:76-79.
2. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:378-384.
3. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
4. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:873-885. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
5. Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T.F. Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010, 32:171-181.
6. Borg B.B., Gupta N.K., Zuckerman G.R., et al. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7:670-675.
7. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:739-750.
8. Enestvedt B.K., Tofani C., Laine L.A., et al. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10:1225-1231.
9. Seo E.H., Kim T.O., Park M.J., et al. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:583-590.
10. Kilgore T.W., Abdinoor A.A., Szary N.M., et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1240-1245.
11. Ness R.M., Manam R., Hoen H., et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:1797-1802.
12. Athreya P.J., Owen G.N., Wong S.W., et al. Achieving quality in colonoscopy: bowel preparation timing and colon cleanliness. Aust N Z J Surg 2011, 81:261-265.
13. Chung Y.W., Han D.S., Park K.H., et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol. A prospective study in Korea. JClin Gastroenterol 2009, 43:448-452.
14. Lebwohl B., Wang T., Neuget A.I. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010, 55:2014-2020.
15. Nguyen D.L., Wieland M. Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. JGastrointest Liver Dis 2010, 19:369-372.
16. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., et al. Anew method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. JChronic Dis 1987, 40:373-383.
17. Aronchick C.A., Lipshutz W.H., Wright S.H., et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing (abstr). Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:2667.
18. Hassan C., Fuccio L., Bruno M., et al. Apredictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10:501-506.
19. Fok K.C., Turner I.B., Teoh W.C., et al. Obesity does not affect sodium picosulphate bowel preparation. Intern Med J 2012, 42:1324-1329.
20. Lai E.J., Calderwood A.H., Doros G., et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:620-625.
21. Lebwohl B., Kastrinos F., Glick M., et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1207-1214.
22. Kazarian E.S., Carreira F.S., Toribara N.W., et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:438-442.
23. Rex D.K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2866-2877.
24. Okabayashi K., Ashrafian H., Hasegawa H., et al. Body mass index category as a risk factor for colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:1175-1185.
25. Ben Q., An W., Jiang Y., et al. Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2012, 142:762-772.
26. Finkelstein E.A., Trogdon J.G., Cohen J.W., et al. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009, 28:w822-w831.
27. Rex D.K., Imperiale T.F., Latinovich D.R., et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1696-1700.