Point process modelling for directed interaction networks

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 821-849

  Perry, Patrick O ^a   Wolfe, Patrick J ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cox proportional hazards model; Network data analysis; Partial likelihood inference; Point processes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885850668     PISSN: 13697412     EISSN: 14679868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R. D. and Keiding, N. (1993) Statistical Models based on Counting Processes. New York: Springer.
2. Andersen, P. K. and Gill, R. D. (1982) Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann. Statist., 10, 1100-1120.
3. Anderson, C. J., Wasserman, S. and Crouch, B. (1999) A p* primer: logit models for social networks. Socl Netwrks, 21, 37-66.
4. Aral, S., Muchnik, L. and Sundararajan, A. (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 21544-21549.
5. Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. (2004) Convex Optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Breslow, N. E. (1974) Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics, 30, 89-99.
7. Broström, G. (2002) Cox regression; ties without tears. Communs Statist. Theor. Meth., 31, 285-297.
8. Butts, C. T. (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodol., 38, 155-200.
9. Cohen, W. W. (2009) Enron email dataset. (Available from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~enron/.)
10. Cook, R. J. and Lawless J. F. (2007) The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events. Berlin: Springer.
11. Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 34, 187-220.
12. Cox, D. R. (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika, 62, 269-276.
13. Eagle, N. and Pentland, A. S. (2006) Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Persnl Ubiquit. Comput., 10, 255-268.
14. Efron, B. (1977) The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 72, 557-565.
15. Fleming, T. R. and Harrington, D. P. (1991) Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York: Wiley.
16. Fowler, J. H. (2006) Connecting the Congress: a study of cosponsorship networks. Polit. Anal., 14, 456-487.
17. Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E. and Airoldi, E. M. (2009) A survey of statistical network models. Found. Trends Mach. Learn., 2, 129-233.
18. Haberman, S. J. (1977) Maximum likelihood estimates in exponential response models. Ann. Statist., 5, 815-841.
19. Jackson, M. O. (2008) Social and Economic Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Kantorovich, L. V. (1952) Functional analysis and applied mathematics. (Engl. transl. C. D. Benster). Report 1509.National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg.
21. Kolaczyk, E. D. (2009) Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models. New York: Springer.
22. Lenglart, E. (1977) Relation de domination entre deux processus. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 13, 171-179.
23. Lunagómez, S., Mukherjee, S. and Wolpert, R. L. (2009) Geometric representations of hypergraphs for prior specification and posterior sampling. Technical Report 2009-01. Duke University, Durham.
24. Martinussen, T. and Scheike, T. H. (2006) Dynamic Regression Models for Survival Data. New York: Springer.
25. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall.
26. Mckenzie, D. and Rapoport, H. (2007) Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: theory and evidence from Mexico. J. Devlpmnt Econ., 84, 1-24.
27. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. A. Rev. Sociol., 27, 415-444.
28. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J. (2006) Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
29. Papachristos, A. V. (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. Am. J. Sociol., 115, 74-128.
30. Rebolledo, R. (1980) Central limit theorems for local martingales. Probab. Theor. Reltd Flds, 51, 269-286.
31. Shafiei, M. and Chipman, H. (2010) Mixed membership stochastic block-models for transactional networks. In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Data Mining, pp. 1019-1024. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Press.
32. Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. V. and Steglich, C. E. G. (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Socl Netwrks, 32, 44-60.
33. Sundaresan, S. R., Fischoff, I. R., Dushoff, J. and Rubenstein, D. I. (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy's zebra and onager. Oecologia, 151, 140-149.
34. Tapia, R. A. (1971) The Kantorovich theorem for Newton's method. Am. Math. Mnthly, 78, 389-392.
35. Therneau, T. M., Grambsch, P. M. and Fleming, T. R. (1990) Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika, 77, 147-160.
36. Therneau, T. and Lumley, T. (2009) survival: Survival analysis, including penalised likelihood. R Package Version 2.35-8. (Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.)
37. Tyler, J. R., Wilkinson, D. M. and Huberman, B. A. (2005) E-mail as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations. Inform. Soc., 21, 143-153.
38. Vu, D. Q., Asuncion, A., Hunter, D. and Smyth, P. (2011a) Continuous-time regression models for longitudinal networks. Adv. Neurl Inform. Process. Syst., 24, 2492-2500.
39. Vu, D. Q., Asuncion, A. U., Hunter, D. R. and Smyth, P. (2011b) Dynamic egocentric models for citation networks. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 857-864. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
40. Wong, W. H. (1986) Theory of partial likelihood. Ann. Statist., 14, 88-123.
41. Zhou, Y., Goldberg, M., Magdon-Ismail, M. and Wallace, W. A. (2007) Strategies for cleaning organizational emails with an application to Enron email dataset. In Proc. 5th A. Conf. North American Association for Computatational Social Organization Science. Pittsburgh: North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science.