Argument-based machine learning

Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 463-482

  Bratko, Ivan ^a   Žabkar, Jure ^a   Možina, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885790023     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Kevin D. Ashley and Edwina L. Rissland. Law, learning and representation. Artificial Intelligence, 150:17-58, 2003.
2. Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence Pearson Education/Addison-Wesley, 2001.
3. Ivan Bratko and Martin Možina. Argumentation and machine learning. In: Deliverable 2.1 for the ASPIC project, 2004.
4. Stefanie Brüninghaus and Kevin D. Ashley. Predicting the outcome of case-based legal arguments. In G. Sartor, editor, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL), pages 233-242, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, June 2003.
5. B. Cestnik. Estimating probabilities: A crucial task in machine learning. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 147-149, 1990.
6. Peter Clark and Robin Boswell. Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In Machine Learning-Proceeding of the Fifth Europen Conference (EWSL-91), pages 151-163, Berlin, 1991.
7. Peter Clark and Tim Niblett. The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning Journal, 4(3):261-283, 1989.
8. J. Demšar and B. Zupan. Orange: From experimental machine learning to interactive data mining. White Paper [http://www.ailab.si/orange], Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 2004.
9. Sašo Džeroski, Bojan Cestnik, and Igor Petrovski. Using the m-estimate in rule induction. CIT. J. Comput. Inf. Technol., 1:37-46, 1993.
10. C. Fellbaum. WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.
11. Sergio A. Gomez and Carlos I. Chesnevar. Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques. Technical report, Universidad Nacional del Sur, 2004.
12. Sergio A. Gomez and Carlos I. Chesnevar. Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy art neural networks for pattern classification. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 4(1):45-51, April 2004.
13. Matej Guid, Martin Možina, Jana Krivec, Aleksander Sadikov, and Ivan Bratko. Learning positional features for annotating chess games. Computers and Games Conference 2008, Bejing, 2008.
14. David D. Jensen and Paul R. Cohen. Multiple comparisons in induction algorithms. Machine Learning, 38(3):309-338, March 2000. (Pubitemid 30572448)
15. Martin Možina, Janez Demšar, Jure Žabkar, and Ivan Bratko. Why is rule learning optimistic and how to correct it. In Johannes Fuernkranz, Tobias Scheffer, and Myra Spiliopoulou, editors, Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML 2006), pages 330-340, Berlin, 2006. Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 44618843)
16. Martin Možina, Matej Guid, Jana Krivec, Aleksander Sadikov, and Ivan Bratko. Fighting knowledge acquisition bottleneck with Argument Based Machine Learning Proc. ECAI'08, Patras, 2008.
17. Martin Možina, Claudio Giuliano, and Ivan Bratko. Arguments extracted from text in argument based machine learning: a case study. SAMT Workshop, Koblenz, 2008.
18. Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, and Ivan Bratko. D3.4: Implementation of and experiments with ABML and MLBA. ASPIC Deliverable D3.4, 2006.
19. Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, and Ivan Bratko. Argument based machine learning. Artificial Intelligence, 171:922-937, 2007. (Pubitemid 47285072)
20. P. M. Murphy and D. W. Aha. UCI Repository of machine learning databases [http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/mlrepository.html]. Irvine, CA: University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, 1994.
21. J. Watson. Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy. Gambit Publications, 1999.