Development and evaluation of the Motivation to Limit Screen-time Questionnaire (MLSQ) for adolescents

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 561-566

  Lubans, D R ^a   Lonsdale, C ^b   Plotnikoff, R C ^a   Smith, J ^a   Dally, K ^a   Morgan, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Motivation; Questionnaire; Reliability; Screen time; Self determination theory; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTIVATION TO LIMIT SCREEN TIME QUESTIONNAIRE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF DETERMINATION THEORY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THEORY;

ADOLESCENTS; CFA; CFI; COMPARATIVE FIT INDEX; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CONTENT VALIDITY COEFFICIENT; ICC; INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; MLSQ; MOTIVATION; MOTIVATION TO LIMIT SCREEN-TIME QUESTIONNAIRE; NEW SOUTH WALES; NSW; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAI; RELATIVE AUTONOMY INDEX; RELIABILITY; SCREEN-TIME; SDT; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SRMR; STANDARDIZED ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL; TREATMENT SELF-REGULATION QUESTIONNAIRE; TSRQ; V; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; MOTIVATION; NEW SOUTH WALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECREATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; TELEVISION;

EID: 84885728283     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aiken L.R. Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1985, 45.
2. Biddle S.J., O'Connell S., Braithwaite R.E. Sedentary behaviour interventions in young people: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45:937-942.
3. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, 20. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
4. Costigan S., Barnett L.M., Plotnikoff R.C., Lubans D.R. The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior in adolescent girls: a systematic review. J. Adolesc. Health 2013, 52:382-392.
5. Currie C., Zanotti C., Morgan A., et al. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study: International Report From the 2009/2010 Survey 2012, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
6. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Handbook of Self-Determination Research 2002, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, New York.
7. Dillman D.A., Sinclair M.D., Clark J.R. Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opin. Q. 1993, 57:289-304.
8. Dunn J.G.H., Bouffard M., Rodgers W.T. Assessing item content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: issues and recommendations. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 1999, 3:15-36.
9. Foehr U.G. Media Multitasking Between American Youth: Prevalence, Predictors and Pairings 2006, The Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California.
10. Ganassali S. The influence of the design of web survey questionnaires on the quality of responses. Surv. Res. Methods 2008, 2:21-32.
11. Garmy P., Jakobsson U., Nyberg P. Development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for measuring sleep length and television and computer habits of Swedish school-age children. J. Sch. Nurs. 2012, 28:138-143.
12. Hagger M.S., Chatzisarantis N., Barkoukis V., Wang C.K.J., Baranowski J. Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. J. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 97:376-390.
13. Hambleton R.K. Test score validity and standard-setting methods. Criterion-Referenced Measurement: State of the Art 1980, 80-123. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. R.A. Berk (Ed.).
14. Hardy L. SPANS 2010 NSW Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey: Executive Summary 2011, University of Sydney, Sydney.
15. Hardy L.L., Booth M.L., Okely A.D. The reliability of the Adolescent Sedentary Activity Questionnaire (ASAQ) 2007, 45:71-74.
16. Hardy L.L., King L., Espinel P., Cosgrove C., Bauman A. NSW Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey (SPANS) 2010: Full Report 2010, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney.
17. He M., Piché L., Beynon C., Harris S. Screen-related sedentary behaviors: children's and parents' attitudes, motivations, and practices. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2010, 42:17-25.
18. Hopkins W.G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000, 30:1-15.
19. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6:1-55.
20. Leatherdale S.T., Wong S.L. Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. 2008, 3:93-101.
21. Lonsdale C., Sabiston C.M., Raedeke T.D., Ha A.S.C., Sum R.K.W. Self-determined motivation and students' physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Prev. Med. 2009, 48:69-73.
22. Lubans D.R., Hesketh K., Cliff D.P., et al. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents. Obes. Rev. 2011, 12:781-799.
23. Lubans D.R., Morgan P.J., Okely A.D., et al. Preventing obesity among adolescent girls: one-year outcomes of the Nutrition and Enjoyable Activity for Teen Girls (NEAT Girls) cluster randomized controlled trial. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2012, 166:821-827.
24. Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. Am. Psychol. 1980, 35:1012-1027.
25. Mhurchu C.N., Roberts V., Maddison R., et al. Effect of electronic time monitors on children's television watching: pilot trial of a home-based intervention. Prev. Med. 2009, 49:413-417.
26. Plotnikoff R.C., Lubans D.R., Costigan S. Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 2013, 56:245-253.
27. Ramirez E.R., Norman G.J., Rosenberg D.E., et al. Adolescent screen time and rules to limit screen time in the home. J. Adolesc. Health 2011, 48:379-385.
28. Rey-López J.P., Ruiz J.R., Ortega F.B., et al. Reliability and validity of a screen time-based sedentary behaviour questionnaire for adolescents: the HELENA study. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 22:373-377.
29. Rosenkranz R.R., Lubans D.R., Peralta L.R., Bennie A., Sanders T., Lonsdale C. A cluster-randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: the Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) trial. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:834.
30. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Active human nature: self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport 2007, 1-19. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. M.S. Hagger, N.L.D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.).
31. Salmon J., Ball K., Hume C., Booth M., Crawford D. Outcomes of a group-randomized trial to prevent excess weight gain, reduce screen behaviors and promote physical activity in 10-year-old children: switch-play. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32:601-612.
32. Salmon J., Tremblay M.S., Marshall S.J., Hume C. Health risks, correlates, and interventions to reduce sedentary behavior in young people. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41:197-206.
33. Tremblay M.S., LeBlanc A.G., Kho M.E., et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8.
34. Uijtdewilligen L., Nauta J., Singh A.S., et al. Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: a review and quality synthesis of prospective studies. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45:896-905.
35. Vallerand R.J. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 271-360. Academic Press, New York. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
36. Wilson P.M., Sabiston C.M., Mack D.E., Blanchard C.M. On the nature and function of scoring protocols used in exercise motivation research: an empirical study of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2012, 13:614-622.