Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit

Nature

Volumn 502, Issue 7470, 2013, Pages 211-214

  Murch, K W ^a,b   Weber, S J ^a   Macklin, C ^a   Siddiqi, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM DOT;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MICROWAVE RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SUPERCONDUCTOR;

EID: 84885607633     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12539     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Carmichael, H. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, 1993).
2. Carmichael, H. J., Kochan, P. & Tian, L. In Proc. Int. Symp. Coherent States: Past, Present, and Future (eds Feng, D. H., Strayer, M. R. & Klauder, J. R.) 75-91 (World Scientific, 1994).
3. Gambetta, J. et al. Quantum trajectory approach to circuit QED: quantum jumps and the Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 77, 012112 (2008).
4. Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Irwin, K. D., Hilton, G. C., Vale, L. R. & Lehnert, K. W. Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial. Nature Phys. 4, 929-931 (2008).
5. Hatridge, M., Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., Clarke, J. & Siddiqi, I. Dispersive magnetometry with aquantumlimitedsquidparametricamplifier.Phys.Rev. B83, 134501 (2011).
6. Sayrin, C. et al. Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states. Nature 477, 73-77 (2011).
7. Vijay, R. et al. Stabilizing Rabi oscillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback. Nature 490, 77-80 (2012).
8. Campagne-Ibarcq, P. et al. Persistent control of a superconducting qubit by stroboscopic measurement feedback. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021008 (2013).
9. Schrödinger, E. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 807-812,-823-824, 844-849 (1935).
10. Guerlin, C. et al. Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. Nature 448, 889-893 (2007).
11. Kuzmich, A. et al. Quantum nondemolition measurements of collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. A 60, 2346-2350 (1999).
12. Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H. & Siddiqi, I. Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110502 (2011).
13. Hatridge, M. et al. Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement. Science 339, 178-181 (2013).
14. Kuzmich, A., Mandel, L. & Bigelow, N. P. Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1594-1597 (2000).
15. Takano, T., Fuyama, M., Namiki, R. & Takahashi, Y. Spin squeezing of a cold atomic ensemble with the nuclear spin of one-half. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033601 (2009).
16. Schleier-Smith, M. H., Leroux, I. D. & Vuletić, V. States of an ensemble of two-level atoms with reduced quantum uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073604 (2010).
17. Riste, D., Bultink, C. C., Lehnert, K. W. & DiCarlo, L. Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240502 (2012).
18. Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
19. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011).
20. Caves, C. M. Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817-1839 (1982).
21. Clerk, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., Marquardt, F. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155-1208 (2010).
22. Korotkov, A. N. Quantum Bayesian approach to circuit QED measurement. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4016 (2011).
23. Wiseman, H. & Milburn, G. Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
24. Schuster, D. I. et al. ac Stark shift and dephasing of a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a cavity field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123602 (2005).
25. Boissonneault, M., Gambetta, J. M. & Blais, A. Dispersive regime of circuit QED: photon-dependent qubit dephasing and relaxation rates. Phys. Rev. A 79, 013819 (2009).
26. Korotkov, A. N. & Jordan, A. N. Undoing a weak quantum measurement of a solidstate qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166805 (2006).
27. Katz, N. et al. Coherent state evolution in a superconducting qubit from partialcollapse measurement. Science 312, 1498-1500 (2006).
28. Katz, N. et al. Reversal of the weak measurement of a quantum state in a superconducting phase qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200401 (2008).
29. Kim, Y.-S., Lee, J.-C., Kwon, O. & Kim, Y.-H. Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal. Nature Phys. 8, 117-120 (2012).
30. Groen, J. P. et al. Partial-measurement back-action and non-classical weak values in a superconducting circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090506 (2013).