Authoritarianism, Need for Closure, and Conditions of Threat

Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 212-227

  Merolla, Jennifer L ^a   Ramos, Jennifer M ^b   Zechmeister, Elizabeth J ^c,d  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP)   (United States)

Author keywords

"extremist" preferences; "Need for closure"; Authoritarian predispositions; Authoritarianism; Collective crisis; Experiment based approach; Right wing; Right wing extremism; Terrorism organization; Terrorist threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885555237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444344073.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Beutler, L. E., Reyes, G., Franco, Z., & Housley, J. (2007). The need for proficient mental health professionals in the study of terrorism. In B. M. Bongar (Ed.), Psychology of terrorism (pp. 32-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
4. Crowson, H. M., Debacker, T. K., & Thoma, S. J. (2006). The role of authoritarianism, perceived threat and need for closure or structure in predicting post-9/11 attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 733-750.
5. Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E.,&Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianismin the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 629-640.
6. Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24(1), 199-222.
7. Federico, C., Golec, A., & Dial, J. (2005). The relationship between the need for closure and support for military action: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 621-632.
8. Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741-770.
9. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Rinehart & Company.
10. Golec, A., & Federico, C. M. (2004). Understanding political conflict and its resolution: Interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 750-762.
11. Greenburg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308-318.
12. Hetherington, M., & Weiler, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hogg, M. A. (in press). Uncertainty-identity theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Horgan, J. (2005). The psychology of terrorism. New York: Routledge.
15. Jorgenson, D. O. (1975). Economic threat and authoritarianism in television programs: 1950-1974. Psychological Reports, 37, 1153-1154.
16. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.
17. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being "right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 395-409.
18. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
19. Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84-100.
20. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.
21. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861-876.
22. Lavine, H., Burgess, D., Snyder, M., Transue, J., Sullivan, J. L., Haney, B., et al. (1996). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 337-347.
23. Lavine, H., Lodge, M.,&Freitas, K. (2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26(2), 219-244.
24. Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentation: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10(4), 343-361.
25. McCann, S. J. H. (1997). Threatening times, "strong" presidential popular vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824-1964. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 160-170.
26. Merolla, J. L., Ramos, J. M.,&Zechmeister, E. J. (2007). Crisis, charisma, and consequences: Evidence from the 2004 US presidential election. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 30-42.
27. Merolla, J., & Zechmeister, E. (2009). Democracy at risk: How terrorist threats affect the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Rickert, E. J. (1998). Authoritarianism and economic threat: Implications for political behavior. Political Psychology, 19(4), 707-720.
29. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books.
30. Sales, S. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(3), 420-428.
31. Sales, S. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(3), 44-57.
32. Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2003). Sacrificing civil liberties to reduce terrorism risks. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(3), 99-120.
34. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
35. Webster, D., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1998). Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology: vol. 8 (pp. 133-173). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.