Robust and censored modeling and prediction of progression in glaucomatous visual fields

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 6694-6700

  Bryan, Susan R ^a,b   Vermeer, Koenraad A ^a   Eilers, Paul H C ^b   Lemij, Hans G ^c   Lesaffre, Emmanuel M E H ^b,d  

^a Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ROTTERDAM EYE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Censored models; Modeling; Prediction; Regression; Robust models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

CENSORED MODELS; MODELING; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; ROBUST MODELS;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84885451848     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11185     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kingman S. Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:887-888.
2. Flammer J, Meier E. Glaucoma: A Guide For Patients: An Introduction for Care-Providers: A Quick Reference. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 2003.
3. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145: 343-353.
4. Kymes SM, Lambert DL, Lee PP, et al. The development of a decision analytic model of changes in mean deviation in people with glaucoma: the COA model. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:1367-1374.
5. Artes PH, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, et al. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 4030-4038.
6. Azarbod P, Mock D, Bitrian E, et al. Validation of pointwise exponential regression to measure the decay rates of glaucomatous visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:5403-5409.
7. Caprioli J, Mock D, Bitrian E, et al. A method to measure and predict rates of regional visual field decay in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4765-4773.
8. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated static perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: C V Mosby; 1999.
9. Russell RA, Crabb DP. Response to Author. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9539-9540.
10. Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24-36.
11. Russell RA, Crabb DP, Malik R, Garway-Heath DF. The relationship between variability and sensitivity in large-scale longitudinal visual field data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:5985-5990.
12. Hawkings DM. Identification of Outliers. London: Chapman and Hall; 1980.
13. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: Wiley; 1987.
14. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1998.
15. Koenker R. Quantile Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
16. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:750-755.
17. Edgeworth FY. On observations relating to several quantities. Hermathena. 1887;6:279-285.
18. Huber PJ. Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981.
19. Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW. Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: Wiley; 1983.
20. Akaike H. Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econom. 1981;16:3-14.
21. Swanson WH, Sun H, Lee BB, Cao D. Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:764-771.
22. Junoy Montolio FG, Wesselink C, Jansonius NM. Persistence, spatial distribution and implications for progression detection of blind parts of the visual field in glaucoma: a clinical cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41211.
23. Junoy Montolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53: 7010-7017.
24. Denniss J, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. An anatomicallycustomisable computational model relating the visual field to the optic nerve head in individual eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6981-6990.
25. Airaksinen PJ, Doro S, Veijola J. Conformal geometry of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:19690-19695.
26. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer; 2000.