Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: An investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 810-822

  Donfrancesco, Andrea ^a   Montemurro, Paolo ^a   Hedén, Per ^a  

^a Akademikliniken   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BREAST; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BREAST; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885440957     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a014cb     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1396-1409; discussion 1410-1415.
2. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using fve measurements in 5 minutes: The high fve decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:2005-2016.
3. Bracaglia R, Fortunato AR, Gentileschi S. A simple way to choose the right implant volume in breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29:407-408.
4. Chavoin JP, Teysseyre A, Grolleau JL. "Morphobreast": Patient's data bank management for objective selection of implant's volume in hypotrophic breasts (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;50:487-493.
5. Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M. Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: The world's largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg. 2001;28:531-552.
6. Garson S, Delay E, Sinna R, Carton S, Delaporte T, Chekaroua K. 3 D evaluation and breast plastic surgery: Preliminary study (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;50:296-308.
7. Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG, et al. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defnes operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:570-575.
8. Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M, Karp N. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:548-551.
9. Tepper OM, Karp NS, Small K, et al. Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2008;14:543-550.
10. Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J. Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: An innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:1134-1139.
11. Garson S, Delay E, Sinna R, Delaporte T, Robbe M, Carton S. 3D evaluation and mammary augmentation surgery (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;50:643-651.
12. Esme DL, Bucksch A, Beekman WH. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:191-195.
13. del Palomar AP, Calvo B, Herrero J, López J, Doblaré M. A fnite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1089-1097.
14. Chavoin JP, André A, Bozonnet E, et al. Mammary implant selection or chest implants fabrication with computer help (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2010;55:471-480.
15. de Heras Ciechomski P, Constantinescu M, Garcia J, et al. Development and implementation of a web-enabled 3D consultation tool for breast augmentation surgery based on 3D-image reconstruction of 2D pictures. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e21.
16. Mahmoudi SE, Akhondi-Asl A, Rahmani R, et al. Web-based interactive 2D/3D medical image processing and visualization software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;98:172-182.
17. Eder M, v Waldenfels F, Sichtermann M, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1152-1160.
18. Hall-Findlay EJ. Discussion: A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:993.
19. Swanson E. A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:982-992.
20. Becker H. The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:893e-894e; author reply 894e-896e.
21. Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K. The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: A 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2125-2132.
22. Sinna R, Garson S, Taha F, et al. Evaluation of 3D numeri-sation with structured light projection in breast surgery (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009;54:317-330.
23. Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: Clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:925-938.
24. Li XJ, Jun F, Gao JH, Li SH, Cao L. Development of a computer-aided system for augmentation mammaplasty simulation (in Chinese). Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2007;27:1489-1491.
25. Kovacs L, Eder M, Zimmermann A, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the infuence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:879-887.
26. Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:494-501.
27. Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, et al. Four-dimensional breast imaging, part I: Introduction of a technology-driven, evidence-based approach to breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:914-924.
28. Coroneos CJ, Ignacy TA, Thoma A. Designing and reporting case series in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:361e-368e.
29. Jenicek M. Clinical case reports and case series research in evaluating surgery. Part II. The content and form: Uses of single clinical case reports and case series research in surgical specialties. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14:RA149-RA162.
30. Jenicek M. Clinical case reports and case series research in evaluating surgery. Part I. The context: General aspects of evaluation applied to surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14:RA133-RA143.
31. Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, et al. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385-1389.
32. Carey TS, Boden SD. A critical guide to case series reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1631-1634.
33. Hedén P. Mastopexy augmentation with form stable breast implants. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:91-104, vii.
34. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:81S-98S; discussion 99S-102S.