Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: Clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 925-938

  Creasman, Craig N ^a   Mordaunt, David ^b   Liolios, Tom ^b   Chiu, Catherine ^c   Gabriel, Allen ^a   Maxwell, G Patrick ^a  

^a Precision Light Inc ^*

^b Precision Light Inc   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

breast surgery; four dimensional imaging; magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSULTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOUR DIMENSIONAL BREAST IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IMAGING SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SIMULATION;

EID: 80755123262     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1090820X11424147     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Creasman C. 4-D breast imaging: the introduction of a technology-driven, evidence-based approach to breast augmentation planning. Paper presented at the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons Meeting ; Washington DC ;..
2. Creasman C, Mordaunt DH, Liolios L, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Four-dimensional breast imaging: part I-introduction of a technology-driven, evidence-based approach to breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 ; xx: xxx - xxx
3. Gabriel A, Fritzsche S, Creasman C, Baqai W, Mordaunt D, Maxwell GP. Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetries: 4D photography. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 ; 31: 506-510
4. Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA, Carlson GW. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 ; 54: 471-476 (Pubitemid 40571551)
5. Tebbetts JB Dimensional Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Saline BioDimensional System. Santa Barbara, CA: McGhan Medical Corp ; 1994 :
6. Mentor Worldwide LLC. Available at: http://www.mentorwwllc.com/ breastsurgery/physician/bodylogic.htm.
7. Heden P Surgery of the Breast. Spear S Willey SC Robb GL Hammond DC Nahabedian MY, ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ; 2006: 1353-1359.
8. Axis Three. [Specifications]. Available at: http://www.axisthree.com/ news/article29/axis-three-launches-industrys-only-4-position-3d-scanner-for- face-and-breast-procedures.
9. Canfield Scientific, Inc. [Specifications]. Available at: http://www.canfieldsci.com/imaging-systems/face-and-body-systems/ VECTRA-X3-Imaging-System/VECTRA-X3-Specs.html.
10. 3dMD. [Specifications]. Available at: http://www.3dmd.com/3dmd- leadership-technology.html.
11. Hedén P, Adams WP, Maxwell P, Nava M, Scheflan M, Stan C. Aesthetic breast surgery: consulting for the future-proposals for improving doctor-patient interactions. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 ; 33: 388-394
12. Esme DL, Bucksch A, Beekman WH. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 ; 33: 191-195
13. Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E. Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 ; 55: 695-696
14. Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M, Karp N. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg. 2006 ; 192: 548-551 (Pubitemid 44344184)
15. Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG, et al. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 ; 62: 570-575
16. Cunningham B. The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 ; 120 (7). 19S - 29S (Pubitemid 350306654)
17. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 ; 120 (7). 8S - 16S (Pubitemid 350306652)
18. McCafferty LR, Casas LA, Stinnett SS, Lin S, Rho J, Skiles M. Multisite analysis of 177 consecutive primary breast augmentations: predictors for reoperation. Aesthet Surg J. 2009 ; 29: 213-220
19. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 ; 109: 1396-1409 (Pubitemid 34270189)
20. Tebbetts JB, Tebbetts TB. An approach that integrates patient education and informed consent in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 ; 110: 971-978 (Pubitemid 34855971)
21. Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Preoperative sizing in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 ; 125: 1781-1787
22. Pechter EA. A new method for determining bra size and predicting postaugmentation breast size. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 ; 102: 1259-1265
23. Brockman J The Edge Foundation. Brockman J, ed. New York, NY: HarperCollins ; 2011 :
24. Walden JL, Panagopoulous G, Shrader SW. Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 ; 30: 395-403
25. O'Grady L, Jadad A. Shifting from shared to collaborative decision making: a change in thinking and doing. J Particip Med. 2010 ; 2: e13
26. O'Grady L, Witteman H, Bender JL, Urowitz S, Wiljer D, Jadad AR. Measuring the impact of a moving target: towards a dynamic framework for evaluating collaborative adaptive interactive technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2009 ; 11: e20
27. Chávez AE, Dagum P, Koch RJ, Newman JP. Legal issues of computer imaging in plastic surgery: a primer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 ; 100: 1601-1608 (Pubitemid 27508227)