Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 879-887

  Kovacs, Laszlo ^a   Eder, Maximilian ^a   Zimmermann, Alexander ^b   Müller, Daniel ^a   Schuster, Tibor ^b   Papadopulos, Nikolaos A ^a   Biemer, Edgar ^c   Klöppel, Markus ^d   MacHens, Hans Günther ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c Clinic Plastic Surgery Munich   (Germany)

^d Clinic of Esthetic Surgery   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D; Augmentation mammaplasty; Breast surgery; Outcome research; Surface imaging

Indexed keywords

SILICONE GEL;

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGAN SIZE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMAPLASTY; ORGAN SIZE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; SILICONE GELS;

EID: 84866413759     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9892-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28:531-552
2. Young VL, Nemecek JR, Nemecek DA (1994) The efficacy of breast augmentation: breast size increase, patient satisfaction, and psychological effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:958-969
3. Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58-70
4. Ferreira MC (2000) Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1630-1635
5. Tepper OM, Unger JG, Small KH, Feldman D, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp NS (2010) Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:393-400
6. Chavoin JP, Teysseyre A, Grolleau JL (2005) Morphobreast: patient's data bank management for objective selection of implant's volume in hypotrophic breasts. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50:487-493
7. Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:331-335
8. Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468-479
9. Bouman FG (1970) Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:263-264
10. Schultz RC, Dolezal RF, Nolan J (1986) Further applications of Archimedes' principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts. Ann Plast Surg 16:98-101
11. Ingleby H (1949) Changes in breast volume in a group of normal young women. Bull Int Assoc Med Mus 29:87-92
12. Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6:363-367
13. Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J (1999) Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1643-1649
14. Rudolph R, Forcier N (2009) Calculation of silicone breast implant volumes using breast magnetic resonance imaging. Aesthet Surg J 29:310-313
15. Pozzobon AV, Sabino Neto M, Veiga DF, Abla LE, Pereira JB, Biasi TL, Ferreira LM, Yamashita LA, Kawano F, Nakano EM, Shigueoka DC (2009) Magnetic resonance images and linear measurements in the surgical treatment of breast asymmetry. Aesth Plast Surg 33:196-203
16. Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J (2007) Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension? Aesth Plast Surg 31:540-543
17. Tegtmeier RE (1978) A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1:625-626
18. Kirianoff TG (1974) Volume measurements of unequal breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:616
19. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconst Surg 66:851-852
20. Brody GS (1981) Breast implant size selection and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:611-613
21. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Endlich M, Mueller A, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16:137-145
22. Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S (2001) Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 10:117-123
23. Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant - soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396-1409
24. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005-2016
25. Adams WP (2007) The high-five process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 27:197-201
26. The BodyLogic SystemTM (2011) Mentor, Santa Barbara, CA. http://www.mentorwwllc.com/global/physician-information/bodylogic. htm. Accessed 10 Aug 2010
27. Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG, Feldman DL, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp NS (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570-575
28. Esme DL, Bucksch A, Beekman WH (2009) Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 33: 191-195
29. Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2007) Re: virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 194:563-565
30. Eder M, Waldenfels FV, Sichtermann M, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA, Machens HG, Biemer E, Kovacs L (2011) Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1495-1502
31. Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2005) Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 55:695-696
32. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57: 602-610
33. Eder M, Schneider A, Feussner H, Zimmermann A, Höhnke C, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2008) Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging. Biomed Tech 53:112-121
34. Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, Wöhnl A, Blaschke M, Eder M, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Rosenberg R, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56:229-236
35. Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471-476
36. Cárdenas-Camarena L, Encinas-Brambila J (2009) Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice? Aesth Plast Surg 33:743-751
37. Hamas RS (1999) The postoperative shape of round and teardrop saline-filled breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 5:369-374
38. Hidalgo DA (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2202-2216
39. Friedman T, Davidovitch N, Scheflan M (2006) Comparative double-blind clinical study on round versus shaped cohesive gel implants. Aesthet Surg J 26:530-536
40. Bronz G (2002) A comparison of naturally shaped and round implants. Aesthet Surg J 22:238-246
41. Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632-1642
42. Vandeput JJ, Nelissen M (2002) Considerations on anthropometric measurements of the female breast. Aesth Plast Surg 26:348-355
43. Vandeput JJ (2006) Predictibility in breast augmentation. Eur J Plast Surg 28:451-457
44. Eder M, Waldenfels FV, Swobodnik A, Klöppel M, Pape AK, Schuster T, Raith S, Kitzler E, Papadopulos NA, Machens HG, Kovacs L (2012) Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging. Breast 21:152-158