Optimal operational conditions for biohydrogen production from sugar refinery wastewater in an ASBR

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 38, Issue 32, 2013, Pages 13895-13906

  Won, S G ^a   Baldwin, S A ^a   Lau, A K ^a   Rezadehbashi, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anaerobic sequencing batch reactor; Clostridium; Hydrogen production; Metabolites; Sugar refinery wastewater; Taxonomic analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); BACTERIA; BATCH REACTORS; CLOSTRIDIUM; METABOLITES; REFINING; SUBSTRATES; SUGAR FACTORIES;

ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; BIO-HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION RATE; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS; SUGAR REFINERY WASTEWATERS; TAXONOMIC ANALYSIS;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

EID: 84885434350     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.071     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fan YT, Zhang YH, Zhang SF, Hou HW, Ren BZ. Efficient conversion of wheat straw wastes into biohydrogen gas by cow dung compost. Bioresour Technol 2006;97: 500-5.
2. Levin DB, Pitt L, Love M. Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2004;29(2): 173-85.
3. Antonopoulou G, Gavala HN, Skiadas IV, Lyberatos G. Effect of substrate concentration on fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36: 4843-51.
4. Kim JO, Kim YH, Ryu JY, Song BK, Kim IH, Yeom SH. Immobilization methods for continuous hydrogen gas production biofilm formation versus granulation. Process Biochem 2005;40(3-4): 1331-7.
5. Wang J, Wan W. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33(12): 2934-41.
6. Kim SH, Han SK, Shin HS. Effect of substrate concentration on hydrogen production and 16S rDNA-based analysis of the microbial community in a continuous fermenter. Process Biochem 2006;41(1): 199-207.
7. Zhu H, Béland M. Evaluation of alternative methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from digested wastewater sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31(14): 1980-8.
8. Kawagoshi Y, Hino N, Fujimoto A, Nakao M, Fujita Y, Sugimura S, et al. Effect of inoculum conditioning on hydrogen production and pH effect on bacterial community relevant to hydrogen production. J Biosci Bioeng 2005;100(5): 524-30.
9. Ohnishi A, Bando Y, Fujimoto N, Suzuki M. Development of a simple bio-hydrogen production system through dark fermentation by using unique microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35(16): 8544-53.
10. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substrates. Anal Chem 1956;28(3): 350-6.
11. APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington DC: USA: American Public Health Association; 2005.
12. Myer R, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology. New York: John Wiley; 2002.
13. Chojnacka A, Błaszczyk MK, Szczȩsny P, Nowak K, Sumińska M, Tomczyk-Zak K, et al. Comparative analysis of hydrogen-producing bacterial biofilms and granular sludge formed in continuous cultures of fermentative bacteria. Bioresour Technol 2011;102(21): 10057-64.
14. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010;7(5): 335-6.
15. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006;22(13): 1658-9.
16. Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454- pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 2011;21(3): 494-504.
17. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(5): 1792-7.
18. Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard JF, Gascuel O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol Biol 2009;537: 113-37.
19. Ueno Y, Otsuka S, Morimoto M. Hydrogen production from industrial wastewater by anaerobic microflora in chemostat culture. J Ferment Bioeng 1996;82(2): 194-7.
20. Wu X, Zhu J, Dong C, Miller C, Li Y, Wang L, et al. Continuous biohydrogen production from liquid swine manure supplemented with glucose using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(16): 6636-45.
21. Williams RT, Crawford RL. Methanogenic bacteria, including an acid-tolerant strain, from peatlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985;50(6): 1542-4.
22. Wieringa KT. The formation of acetic acid from carbon dioxide and hydrogen by anaerobic spore-forming bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1940;6(1): 251-62.
23. Luo G, Karakashev D, Xie L, Zhou Q, Angelidaki I. Long-term effect of inoculum pretreatment on fermentative hydrogen production by repeated batch cultivations: homoacetogenesis and methanogenesis as competitors to hydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011;108(8): 1816-27.
24. Göbner AS, Ricardal F, Tanner RS, Drake HL. Carbon metabolism of the moderately acid-tolerant acetogen Clostridium drakei isolated from peat. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008;287(2): 236-42.
25. Ren NQ, Chua H, Chan SY, Tsang YF, Wang YJ, Sin N. Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous-flow acidogenic reactors. Bioresour Technol 2007;98(9): 1774-80.
26. Wang B, Wan W, Wang J. Inhibitory effect of ethanol, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid on fermentative hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33(23): 7013-9.
27. Won SG, Lau AK. Effects of key operational parameters on biohydrogen production via anaerobic fermentation in a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 2011;102(13): 6876-83.
28. Takahashi N, Yamada T. Glucose metabolism by Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000;15(3): 188-95.
29. Noike T, Takabatake H, Mizuno O, Ohba M. Inhibition of hydrogen fermentation of organic wastes by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002;27(11-12): 1367-71.
30. Jo JH, Jeon CO, Lee DS, Park JM. Process stability and microbial community structure in anaerobic hydrogenproducing microflora from food waste containing kimchi. J Biotechnol 2007;131(3): 300-8.
31. Baghchehsaraee B, Nakhla G, Karamanev D, Margritis A. Effect of extrinsic lactic acid on fermentative hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(6): 2573-9.
32. Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 1977;41(1): 100-80.
33. Yang P, Zhang R, McGarvey JA, Benemann Jr. Biohydrogen production from cheese processing wastewater by anaerobic fermentation using mixed microbial communities. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32(18): 4761-71.
34. Cheng S-S, Chao Y-C, Chen Y-C, Tien Y-M. Biohydrogen fermentation of mixed liquid of kitchen waste and Napier grass with anaerobic fluidized bed process. In: Proceedings of 18th world hydrogen energy conference, Germany 2010 2010.
35. Xing D, Ren N, Li Q, Lin M, Wang A, Zhao L. Ethanoligenens harbinense gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from molasses wastewater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006;56(4): 755-60.
36. Mariakakis I, Bischoff P, Krampe J, Meyer C, Steinmetz H. Effect of organic loading rate and solids retention time on microbial population during bio-hydrogen production by dark fermentation in large lab-scale. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36(17): 10690-700.
37. Li C, Fang HHP. Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2007;37(1): 1-39.
38. Wang J, Wan W. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(2): 799-811.
39. Bélaich JP, Bruschi M, Garcia JL, editors. Microbiology and biochemistry of strict anaerobes involved in interspecies hydrogen transfer. FEMS symposium series, vol. 54. New York: Plenum Press; 1990.
40. Arooj MF, Han S-K, Kim S-H, Kim D-H, Shin H-S. Effect of HRT on ASBR converting starch into biological hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33(22): 6509-14.