Long-term effect of inoculum pretreatment on fermentative hydrogen production by repeated batch cultivations: Homoacetogenesis and methanogenesis as competitors to hydrogen production

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1816-1827

  Luo, Gang ^a,b   Karakashev, Dimitar ^b   Xie, Li ^a   Zhou, Qi ^a   Angelidaki, Irini ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Homoacetogenesis; Hydrogen production; Inoculum pretreatment; Methanogenesis

Indexed keywords

CLOSTRIDIUM BUTYRICUM; FERMENTATION TEMPERATURE; FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; HOMOACETOGENESIS; HYDROGEN YIELDS; INITIAL PH; INOCULA; LONG-TERM EFFECTS; MESOPHILIC; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; METHANOGENESIS; METHANOGENIC ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY ANALYSIS; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; REPEATED BATCH CULTIVATION; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM; THERMOPHILIC CONDITIONS;

BACTERIA; BACTERIOLOGY; BIOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; PH EFFECTS;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

HYDROGEN; LACTIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; CLOSTRIDIUM BUTYRICUM; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; HOMOACETOGENESIS; INOCULATION; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PH; SPECIES CULTIVATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM;

ACETATES; CLOSTRIDIUM BUTYRICUM; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METHANE; TEMPERATURE; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM;

CLOSTRIDIUM BUTYRICUM; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM SP.; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM THERMOSACCHAROLYTICUM;

EID: 79959215089     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23122     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ahn Y, Park EJ, Oh YK, Park S, Webster G, Weightman AJ. 2005. Biofilm microbial community of a thermophilic trickling biofilter used for continuous biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 249: 31-38.
2. Akutsu Y, Li YY, Harada H, Yu HQ. 2009. Effects of temperature and substrate concentration on biological hydrogen production from starch. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 2558-2566.
3. Angelidaki I, Petersen SP, Ahring BK. 1990. Effects of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid inhibition upon addition of bentonite. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33: 469-472.
4. Angelidaki I, Sanders W. 2004. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3: 117-129.
5. APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th edition. New York: American Public Health Association.
6. Arooj MF, Han SK, Kim SH, Kim DH, Shin HS. 2008. Continuous biohydrogen production in a CSTR using starch as a substrate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33: 3289-3294.
7. Benemann J. 1996. Hydrogen biotechnology: Progress and prospects. Nat Biotechnol 14: 1101-1103.
8. Cai ML, Liu JX, Wei YS. 2004. Enhanced biohydrogen production from sewage sludge with alkaline pretreatment. Envrion Sci Technol 38: 3195-3202.
9. Calli B, Boënne W, Vanbroekhoven K. 2006. Bio-hydrogen potential of easily biodegradable substrate through dark fermentation. Proceedings of the 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference 215-216.
10. Calli B, Zhao J, Nijssen E, Vanbroekhoven K. 2008. Significance of acetogenic H-2 consumption in dark fermentation and effectiveness of pH. Water Sci Technol 57: 809-814.
11. Chen M. 1983. Adaption of mesophilic anaerobic sewage fermentor populations to thermophilic temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 1271-1276.
12. Cheong DY, Hansen CL. 2006. Acidogenesis characteristics of natural, mixed anaerobes converting carbohydrate-rich synthetic wastewater to hydrogen. Process Biochem 41: 1736-1745.
13. Dinamarca C, Bakke R. 2009. Apparent hydrogen consumption in acid reactors: Observations and implications. Water Sci Technol 59: 1441-1447.
14. Drake H, Kusel K, Matthies C. 2002. Ecological consequences of the phylogenetic and physiological diversities of acetogens. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81: 203-213.
15. Gavala HN, Skiadas LV, Ahring BK. 2006. Biological hydrogen production in suspended and attached growth anaerobic reactor systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31: 1164-1175.
16. Hu B, Chen SL. 2007. Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32: 3266-3273.
17. Hussy I, Hawkes FR, Dinsdale R, Hawkes DL. 2003. Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from a wheat starch co-product by mixed microflora. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 619-626.
18. Kapdan IK, Kargi F. 2006. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb Technol 38: 569-582.
19. Kim DH, Kim SH, Shin HS. 2009. Hydrogen fermentation of food waste without inoculum addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 45: 181-187.
20. Kongjan P, Min B, Angelidaki I. 2009. Biohydrogen production from xylose at extreme thermophilic temperatures (70°C) by mixed culture fermentation. Water Res 43: 1414-1424.
21. Kraemer JT, Bagley DM. 2007. Improving the yield from fermentative hydrogen production. Biotechnol Lett 29: 685-695.
22. Kraemer JT, Bagley DM. 2008. Measurement of H-2 consumption and its role in continuous fermentative hydrogen production. Water Sci Technol 57: 681-685.
23. Kumar N, Ghosh A, Das D. 2001. Redirection of biochemical pathways for the enhancement of H-2 production by Enterobacter cloacae. Biotechnol Lett 23: 537-541.
24. Lee DY, Li YY, Noike T. 2009. Continuous H-2 production by anaerobic mixed microflora in membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 100: 690-695.
25. Leitao RC, van Haandel AC, Zeeman G, Lettinga G. 2006. The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: A review. Bioresource Technol 97: 1105-1118.
26. Liu DW, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I. 2008. Enrichment and adaptation of extreme-thermophilic (70°C) hydrogen producing bacteria to organic household solid waste by repeated batch cultivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33: 6492-6497.
27. Liu Y, Whitman WB. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann NY Acad Sci 1125: 171-189.
28. Luo G, Xie L, Zou ZH, Wang W, Zhou Q. 2010. Evaluation of pretreatment methods on mixed inoculum for both batch and continuous thermophilic biohydrogen production from cassava stillage. Bioresource Technol 101: 959-964.
29. Mohan SV, Babu VL, Sarma PN. 2008. Effect of various pretreatment methods on anaerobic mixed microflora to enhance biohydrogen production utilizing dairy wastewater as substrate. Bioresource Technol 99: 59-67.
30. Mu Y, Yu HQ, Wang G. 2007. Evaluation of three methods for enriching H-2-producing cultures from anaerobic sludge. Enzyme Microb Technol 40: 947-953.
31. Nath K, Das D. 2004. Improvement of fermentative hydrogen production: various approaches. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65: 520-529.
32. Oh SE, Van Ginkel S, Logan BE. 2003. The relative effectiveness of pH control and heat treatment for enhancing biohydrogen gas production. Environ Sci Technol 37: 5186-5190.
33. O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. 2009. Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresource Technol 100: 909-918.
34. Prasertsan P, O-Thong S, Birkeland NK. 2009. Optimization and microbial community analysis for production of biohydrogen from palm oil mill effluent by thermophilic fermentative process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 7448-7459.
35. Salerno MB, Park W, Zuo Y, Logan BE. 2006. Inhibition of biohydrogen production by ammonia. Water Res 40: 1167-1172.
36. Sanz JL, Köchling T. 2007. Molecular biology technologies used in wastewater treatment: An overview. Process Biochem 42: 119-133.
37. 2 in ananerobic hyperthermophilic eubacterium thermotoga maritima: involvement of the Embden-Meyerhof pathway. Arch Microbiol 161: 460-470.
38. 2 production from heat-shock-treated consortia. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 4291-4295.
39. Van Ginkel S, Sung SW, Lay JJ. 2001. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 35: 4726-4730.
40. Wang JL, Wan W. 2008. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33: 2934-2941.
41. Wang JL, Wan W. 2009. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 799-811.
42. Xu KW, Liu H, Chen J. 2010. Effect of classic methanogenic inhibitors on the quantity and diversity of archael community and the reductive homoacetogenic activity during the process of anaerobic sludge digestion. Bioresource Technol 101: 2600-2607.
43. 2-production from starch by a mixed culture of Clostridium butyricum and Rhodobacter sp. M-19. Biotechnol Lett 20: 895-899.
44. Yokoyama H, Moriya N, Ohmori H, Waki M, Ogino A, Tanaka Y. 2007. Community analysis of hydrogen-producing extreme thermophilic anaerobic microflora enriched from cow manure with five substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77: 213-222.
45. Yu HQ, Zhu ZH, Hu WR, Zhang HS. 2002. Hydrogen production from rice winery wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor by using mixed anaerobic cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27: 1359-1365.
46. Zhao CX, O-Thong S, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I, Lu WJ, Wang HT. 2009. High yield simultaneous hydrogen and ethanol production under extreme-thermophilic (70°C) mixed culture environment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 14: 5657-5665.
47. Zhu HG, Beland M. 2006. Evaluation of alternative methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from digested wastewater sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31: 1980-1988.