Comparing performance of the CADstream and the DynaCAD breast MRI CAD systems: CADstream vs. DynaCAD in breast MRI

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 971-976

  Pan, Joann ^a   Dogan, Basak E ^b   Carkaci, Selin ^c   Santiago, Lumarie ^b   Arribas, Elsa ^b   Cantor, Scott B ^b   Wei, Wei ^b   Stafford, R Jason ^b   Whitman, Gary J ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast diseases; Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); Computer assisted detection; Diagnostic imaging; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DETECTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MR IMAGING;

DISEASES; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; USER INTERFACES; VOLUME RENDERING;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885423773     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9602-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, Muller S, Wesseling J, Peeters M, Gilhuijs K: Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol 29:660-666, 2011
2. Dorrius MD, Jansen-van der Weide MC, van Ooijen PM, et al: Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21(8):1600-1608, 2011
3. Demartini WB, Lehman CD, Peacock S, et al: Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acad Radiol 12(7):806-14, 2005
4. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, et al: A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(1):51-6, 2006
5. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244(1):94-103, 2007
6. Meeuwis C, van de Ven SM, Stapper G, et al: Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 20(3):522-8, 2010
7. Arazi-Kleinman T, Causer PA, Jong RA, et al: Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population? Clin Radiol 64(12):1166-74, 2009
8. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al: Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol 183:1149-1157, 2004
9. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485-492, 2007
10. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, Allain MD, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Lehman CD: Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol 194:1664-1673, 2010
11. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al: Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211(1):101-110, 1999
12. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RF, Ruijs JH: False negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7(8):1231-1234, 1997
13. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contract-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality-safety/guidelines/breast/ MRI-breast.aspx. Accessed August 16, 2010.
14. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al: Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215(1):267-279, 2000
15. Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5):427-437, 2004
16. Doi K: Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:198-211, 2007
17. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
18. Ko ES, Choi HY, Lee BH, Noh W, Kim RB: Central washout sign in computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 52:256-263, 2011
19. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X: A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. Am J Roentgenol 187:51-56, 2006
20. Kurz KD, Steinhaus D, Klar V, et al: Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 69:300-307, 2009