Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 300-307

  Kurz, K D ^a   Steinhaus, D ^b   Klar, V ^b   Cohnen, M ^b   Wittsack, H J ^b   Saleh, A ^b   Modder U ^b   Blondin, D ^b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer application detection; Diagnosis; Dynamic MRI of the breast; Software

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER APPLICATION/DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS; DYNAMIC MRI OF THE BREAST; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST ADENOSIS; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETER; PARENCHYMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCAR;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION;

EID: 59649098255     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
2. Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Viehweg P., Heinig A., and Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24 (1997) 94-108
3. Harms S.E., and Flamig D.P. MR imaging of the breast: technical approach and clinical experience. Radiographics 13 (1993) 905-912
4. Kriege M., Brekelmans C.T., Boetes C., et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 427-437
5. Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Bick U., Bradley Jr. W.G., et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11 (2001) 531-546
6. Jacobs M.A., Barker P.B., Bluemke D.A., et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 229 (2003) 225-232
7. Rankin SC. MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 806-818
8. Radiology ACo. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. vol. 1 (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston
9. Lehman C.D., Peacock S., DeMartini W.B., and Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 51-56
10. Kelcz F., Furman-Haran E., Grobgeld D., and Degani H. Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 1485-1492
11. Safir J. 3TP and magnetic resonance breast imaging: interview with Dr. Julian Safir. Integr Cancer Ther 4 (2005) 45-47
12. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Siegelman E.S., et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 409-415
13. Teifke A., Behr O., Schmidt M., et al. Dynamic MR imaging of breast lesions: correlation with microvessel distribution pattern and histologic characteristics of prognosis. Radiology 239 (2006) 351-360
14. Saleh A., Wittsack H., Cohnen M., Poll L., and Mödder U. Accelerated and improved analysis of dynamic breast MRI: Parameter image versus subtraction image guided ROI selection. Eur Radiol 13 Suppl. 1 (2003) 399
15. Wittsack H., Saleh A., Cohnen M., Kleiser R., Jonkmanns C., and Mödder U. A new software system to accelerate the analysis of dynamic MR breast imaging data. Radiology 229 (S) (2003) 806
16. Kurz KD, Wittsack HJ, Willers R, Blondin D, Modder U, Saleh A. Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection? Eur Radiol 2007 [Epub June 16].
17. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H., and Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236 (2005) 789-800
18. Vomweg T.W., Teifke A., Kunz R.P., et al. Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 1732-1742
19. Kneeshaw P.J., Turnbull L.W., Smith A., and Drew P.J. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29 (2003) 32-37
20. Bartella L., Liberman L., Morris E.A., and Dershaw D.D. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 865-870
21. Bazzocchi M., Zuiani C., Panizza P., et al. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1723-1732
22. Zuo C.S., Jiang A., Buff B.L., Mahon T.G., and Wong T.Z. Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging. Radiology 198 (1996) 903-906
23. Subramanian K.R., Brockway J.P., and Carruthers W.B. Interactive detection and visualization of breast lesions from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI volumes. Comput Med Imaging Graph 28 (2004) 435-444
24. Denton E.R., Sonoda L.I., Rueckert D., et al. Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 (1999) 800-805
25. Sardanelli F., Fausto A., Iozzelli A., Rescinito G., and Calabrese M. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. Effect of changing the region of interest on early enhancement using 2D and 3D techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 (2004) 642-646
26. Mussurakis S., Gibbs P., and Horsman A. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 206 (1998) 465-473
27. Liney G.P., Gibbs P., Hayes C., Leach M.O., and Turnbull L.W. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: user-defined versus semi-automated region-of-interest analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 945-949
28. Mussurakis S., Buckley D.L., and Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 (1997) 431-438
29. Wiener J.I., Schilling K.J., Adami C., and Obuchowski N.A. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 878-886