Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 813-818

  Mihl, Casper ^a,b   Wildberger, Joachim E ^a,b   Jurencak, Tomas ^a   Yanniello, Michael J ^c   Nijssen, Estelle C ^a   Kalafut, John F ^c   Nalbantov, Georgi ^d   Mühlenbruch, Georg ^e   Behrendt, Florian F ^e   Das, Marco ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

attenuation; contrast media; coronary CTA; iodine delivery rate

Indexed keywords

IODINE; IOMEPROL; IOPROMIDE;

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CIRCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DESCENDING AORTA; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; HYPERBARISM; HYPOBARISM; INTRAVASCULAR ATTENUATION; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOSITY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; IOHEXOL; IOPAMIDOL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84885419400     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829979e8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Behrendt FF, Bruners P, Keil S, et al. Impact of different vein catheter sizes for mechanical power injection in CT: in vitro evaluation with use of a circulation phantom. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:25-31.
2. Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, et al. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2004;233:682-688.
3. Johnson PT, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. IV contrast infusion for coronary artery CTangiography: literature review and results of a nationwide survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:W214-W221.
4. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010;256:32-61.
5. Kumamaru KK, Steigner ML, Soga S, et al. Coronary enhancement for prospective ECG-gated single R-R axial 320-MDCT angiography: comparison of 60-and 80-mL iopamidol 370 injection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197: 844-850.
6. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, et al. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiogra-phy: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:349-353.
7. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology. 2005;236:661-665.
8. Becker CR, Vanzulli A, Fink C, et al. Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:457-464.
9. Mühlenbruch G, Behrendt FF, Eddahabi MA, et al. Which iodine concentration in chest CT?Va prospective study in 300 patients. Eur Radiol. 2008;18: 2826-2832.
10. Rist C, Nikolaou K, Kirchin MA, et al. Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography: comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400 milligrams of iodine per milliliter. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41:460-467.
11. Behrendt FF, Plumhans C, Keil S, et al. Contrast enhancement in chest multidetector computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of 300 mg/mL versus 400 mg/mL iodinated contrast medium. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:144-149.
12. Nance JW Jr, Henzler T, Meyer M, et al. Optimization of contrast material delivery for dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:78-84.
13. Knollmann F, Schimpf K, Felix R. Iodine delivery rate of different concentrations of iodine-containing contrast agents with rapid injection. Rofo. 2004; 176:880-884.
14. Brunette J, Mongrain R, Laurier J, et al. 3D flow study in a mildly stenotic coronary artery phantom using a whole volume PIV method. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1193-1200.
15. Behrendt FF, Bruners P, Kalafut J, et al. Introduction of a dedicated circulation phantom for comprehensive in vitro analysis of intravascular contrast material application. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:729-736.
16. Christensen JD, Meyer LT, Hurwitz LM, et al. Effects of iopamidol-370 versus iodixanol-320 on coronary contrast, branch depiction, and heart rate variability in dual-source coronary MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197:W445-W451.
17. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1426-1431.
18. Tsai IC, Lee T, Tsai WL, et al. Contrast enhancement in cardiac MDCT: comparison of iodixanol 320 versus iohexol 350. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:W47-W53.
19. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:272-280.
20. Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP. Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method. Radiology. 2004;231:732-736.
21. Szucs-Farkas Z, Verdun FR, von Allmen G, et al. Effect of x-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43:374-381.
22. Inc. BHP. Data Sheet ULTRAVIST\. 2012 [updated 13-11-2012; cited 2012 13-11-2012]; Available at: http://www.bayerresources.com.au/resources/uploads/ DataSheet/file9512.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2012.