The biological treatment of high salinity synthetic oilfield produced water in a submerged membrane bioreactor using a halophilic bacterial consortium

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 88, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2016-2026

  Sharghi, Elham Abdollahzadeh ^a   Bonakdarpour, Babak ^a   Roustazade, Pegah ^a   Amoozegar, Mohammad A ^b   Rabbani, Ahamad R ^a  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Biological treatment; Halophilic bacteria; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Organic loading rate (OLR); Produced water (PW)

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; HALOPHILIC BACTERIA; MEMBRANE BIO REACTOR (MBR); ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PRODUCED WATER;

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; MEMBRANE FOULING; OFFSHORE OIL WELLS; OIL FIELDS;

LOADING;

OIL; PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; HALOPHILIC BACTERIUM; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; ORGANIC LOADING RATE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRODUCED WATER; SALINITY; SEA; SLUDGE RETENTION TIME; SUPERNATANT; TURBIDITY; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84885407133     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4061     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Fakhru'l-Razi A, Pendashteh AR, Luqman Chuah A, Dayang Radiah AB, Madaeni SS and Zurina ZA, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170:530-551 (2009).
2. Neff JM, Bioaccumulation in Marine Organisms: Effects of Contaminants from Oil Well Produced Water. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2002).
3. Tibbetts PJC, Buchanan IT, Gawel LJ and Large R, A comprehensive determination of produced water composition, in Technological/Environmental Issues and Solutions, ed by Ray JP and Engelhardt FR. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, pp. 97-113 (1992).
4. Shpiner R, Liu G and Stuckey DC, Treatment of oilfield produced water by waste stabilization ponds: biodegradation of petroleum-derived materials. Bioresource Technol 100:6229-6235 (2009).
5. Campos JC, Borges RMH, Oliveira Filho AM, Nobrega R and Sant'Anna GL, Oilfield wastewater treatment by combined microfiltration and biological processes. Water Res 36:95-104 (2002).
6. Doyle DH and Brown AB, Produced water treatment and hydrocarbon removal with organoclay. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1-4 October, Dallas, Texas, USA (2000).
7. Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F and Moulin P, Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater 150:468-493 (2008).
8. Pajoum Shariati SR, Bonakdarpour B, Zare N and Zokaee Ashtiani F, The effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance and fouling characteristics of membrane sequencing batch reactors used for the treatment of synthetic petroleum refinery wastewater. Bioresource Technol 102:7692-7699 (2011).
9. Scholz W and Fuchsm W, Treatment of oil contaminated wastewater in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 34:3621-3629 (2000).
10. Kargi F, Enhanced biological treatment of saline wastewater by using halophilic bacteria. Biotechnol 24:1569-1572 (2002).
11. Dincer AR and Kargi F, Performance of rotating biological disc system treating saline wastewater. Process Biochem 36:901-906 (2001).
12. Lefebvre O and Moletta R, Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res 40:3671-3682 (2006).
13. Ng HY, Ong SL and Ng WJ, Effects of sodium chloride on the performance of a sequencing batch reactor. J Environ Eng - ASCE 131:1557-1564 (2005).
14. Woolard CR and Irvine RL, Treatment of hypersaline wastewater in the sequencing batch reactor. Water Res 29:1159-1168 (1995).
15. Freire DDC, Cammarota MC and Sant'Anna GL, Biological treatment of oil field wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Environ Technol 22:1125-1135 (2001).
16. Diaz MP, Grigson SJW, Peppiatt, CJ and Burgess JG, Isolation and characterization of novel hydrocarbon-degrading euryhaline consortium from crude oil and mangrove sediments. Mar Biotechnol 2:522-532 (2000).
17. Diaz MP, Boyd KG, Grigson SJW and Burgess JG, Biodegradation of crude oil across a wide range of salinities by an extremely halotolerant bacterial consortium MPD-M, immobilized onto polypropylene fibers. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:145-153 (2002).
18. Li Q, Kang C and Zhang C, Waste water produced from an oilfield and continuous treatment with an oil-degrading bacterium. Process Biochem 40:87-877 (2005).
19. Tellez GT, Nirmalakhandan N and Gardea-Torresdey JL, Performance evaluation of an activated sludge system for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from oilfield produced water. Adv Environ Res 6:455-470 (2002).
20. Pendashteh AR, Fakhru'l-Razi A, Luqman Chuah A, Dayang Radiah AB, Madaeni SS and Zainal ZA, Biological treatment of produced water in a sequencing batch reactor by isolated halophilic microorganism consortium. Environ Technol 31:1229-1239 (2010).
21. Fakhru'l-Razi A, Pendashteh AR, Zurina ZA, Luqman Chuah A, Dayang Radiah AB and Madaeni SS, Application of membrane-coupled sequencing batch reactor for oilfield produced water recycle and beneficial reuse. Bioresource Technol 101:6942-6949 (2010).
22. Pendashteh AR, Luqman Chuah A, Fakhru'l-Razi A, Madaeni SS, Zurina ZA and Dayang Radiah AB, Evaluation of membrane bioreactor for hypersaline oily wastewater treatment. Process Safe Environ 90:45-55 (2011).
23. McAdam E, Judd SJ, Gildemeister R, Drews A and Kraume M, Critical analysis of submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor operating conditions. Water Res 39:4011-4019 (2005).
24. Vargas A, Moreno-Andrade I and Buitrn G, Controlled backwashing in a membrane sequencing batch reactor used for toxic wastewater treatment. J Membrane Sci 320:185-190 (2008).
25. Dialynas E and Diamadopoulos E, The effect of biomass adsorption on the removal of selected pharmaceutical compound in an immersed membrane bioreactor system. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:232-237 (2012).
26. Rosenberger S, Kruger U, Witzig R, Manz W, Szewzyk U and Kraume M, Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Res 36:413-420 (2002).
27. Pollice A, Laera G, Saturno D and Giordano C, Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage. J Membrane Sci 317:65-70 (2008).
28. Knoblock MD, Sutton PM, Mishra PN, Gupta K and Janson A, Membrane biological reactor system for treatment of oily wastewaters. Water Environ Res 66:133-139 (1994).
29. Fallah N, Bonakdarpour B, Nasernejad B and Alavi Moghadam MR, Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT). J Hazard Mater 178:718-724 (2010).
30. Marrot B, Barrios-Martinez A, Moulin P and Roche N, Biodegradation of high phenol concentration by activated sludge in an immersed membrane bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 30:174-183 (2006).
31. Barrios-Martinez A, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P and Roche N, Degradation of synthetic phenol-containing wastewaters by MBR. J Membrane Sci 281:288-296 (2006).
32. Dosta J, Nieto JM, Vila J, Grifoll M and Mata-Alvarez J, Phenol removal from hypersaline wastewaters in a membrane biological reactor (MBR): operation and microbiological characterization. Bioresource Technol 102:4013-4020 (2011).
33. Vyrides I and Stuckey DC, Chromium removal mechanisms and bacterial community in an integrated membrane bioreactor system. Environ Eng Sci 28:661-670 (2011).
34. Hemmelmann A, Torres A, Vergara Ch, Azocar L and Jeison D, Application of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of protein containing wastewaters under saline conditions. J Chem Technol Biotechnol (in press, 2012). Latest info required
35. Artiga P, García-Toriello G, Méndez R and Garrido JM, Use of a hybrid membrane bioreactor for the treatment of saline wastewater from a fish canning factory. Desalination 221:518-525 (2008).
36. Kwon S, Sullivan EJ, Katz L, Kinney K and Bowman R, Pilot scale test of a produced water-treatment system for initial removal of organic compounds. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 21-24 September, Denver, Colorado, USA (2008).
37. rd international gas processing symposium. 5-7 March, Qatar (2012).
38. Woolard CR and Irvine RL, Biological treatment of hypersaline wastewater by a biofilm of halophilic bacteria. Water Environ Res 66:230-235 (1994).
39. Marmur J, A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3:208-218 (1961).
40. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaeffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W and Lipman DJ, Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402 (1997).
41. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK and Lim YW, EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2259-2261 (2007).
42. Freire DDC and Sant'Anna GL, A proposed method modification for the determination of COD in saline waters. Environ Technol 19:243-247 (2002).
43. APHA, AWWA and WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, Washington DC, USA, (2005).
44. Chang IS, Lee CH and Ahn KH, Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane coupled activated sludge system: the effect of floc structure on membrane fouling. Sep Sci Technol 34:1743-1758 (1999).
45. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NH, Farr AL and Randall RJ, Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265-275 (1951).
46. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA and Smith F, Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350-356 (1956).
47. Frølund B, Palmgren R, Keiding K and Nielsen PH, Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res 30:1749-1758 (1996).
48. Xie G, Barcelona MJ and Fang J, Quantification and interpretation of total petroleum hydrocarbons in sediment samples by a GC/MS method and comparison with EPA 418.1 and a rapid field method. Anal Chem 71:1899-1904 (1999).
49. Huang Z, Ong SL and Ng HY, Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res 45:705-713 (2011).
50. Meng F, Shi B, Yang FL and Zhang H, Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 30:359-367 (2007).
51. Rosenberger S, Kruger U, Witzig R, Manz W, Szewzyk U and Kraume M, Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Res 36:413-420 (2002).
52. Sun DD, Hay CT and Khor SL, Effects of hydraulic retention time on behavior of start-up submerged membrane bioreactor with prolonged sludge retention time. Desalination 195:209-225 (2006).
53. Scheumann R and Kraume M, Influence of hydraulic retention time on the operation of a submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor (SM-SBR) for the treatment of greywater. Desalination 246:444-451 (2009).
54. Chen YX, Liu H and Chen HL, Characterization of phenol biodegradation by Comamonas testosteroni ZD4-1 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ZD4-3. Biomed Environ Sci 16:163-172 (2003).
55. Zhao X, Wang Y, Ye Z, Borthwick A and Ni J, Oil field wastewater treatment in biological aerated filter by immobilized microorganisms. Process Biochem 41:1475-1483 (2006).
56. Wu B and Zhou W, Investigation of soluble microbial products in anaerobic wastewater treatment effluents. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:1597-1603 (2010).
57. Holler S and Trosch W, Treatment of urban wastewater in a membrane bioreactor at high organic loading rates. J Biotechnol 92:95-101(2001).
58. Lu M, Zhang Z, Yu W and Zhu W, Biological treatment of oilfield-produced water: a field pilot study. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63:316-321 (2009).
59. Massé A, Spérandio M and Cabassud C, Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res 40:2405-2415 (2006).
60. Ng HY and Hermanowicz SW, Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. Water Res 39:981-992 (2005b).
61. Satyawali Y and Balakrishnan M, Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep Purif Technol 63:278-286 (2008).
62. Rahman MM and Al-Malack MH, Performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor (CF-MBR) when treating refinery wastewater. Desalination 191:16-26 (2006).
63. Chiu TY, Lara Dominguez MV and James AE, Critical flux and rejection behavior of non-circular-channeled membranes: influence of some operating conditions. Sep Purif Technol 50:212-219 (2006).
64. Sperandio M, Masseá A and Cabassud C, Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor. Paper presented at the IWA Biennal World Water Congress and Exhibition. 19-24 September, Marrakech, Marroco (2004).