Degradation of synthetic phenol-containing wastewaters by MBR

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 281, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 288-296

  Barrios Martinez, A ^a   Barbot, E ^a   Marrot, B ^a   Moulin, P ^a   Roche, N ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Feasibility study; MBR; Phenol degradation; Sub critical operating conditions

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOREACTORS; DEGRADATION; MEMBRANES; PHENOLS; SEPARATION;

FEASIBILITY STUDY; MBR; PHENOL DEGRADATION; SUB-CRITICAL OPERATING CONDITIONS;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

PHENOL; PHENOL DERIVATIVE;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOREACTORS; DEGRADATION; MEMBRANES; PHENOLS; SEPARATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; OIL INDUSTRY; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SLUDGE; STEADY STATE; WASTE WATER;

EID: 33746916127     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.048     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease registry 2003 Medical Management Guidelines for phenol. http://atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/mmg115.html (10/02/2006).
2. Nuhoglu A., and Yalcin B. Modelling of phenol removal in a batch reactor. Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 1233-1239
3. J. Yan, W. Jianping, B. Jing, W. Daoquan, Phenol biodegradation by the yeast candida tropicalis in the presence of m-cresol, Bio. Eng. J., in press.
4. Gernjak W., Krutzler T., Malato A.G.S., Caceres J., Bauer R., and Fernández-Alba A.R. Photo-Fenton treatment of water containing natural phenolic pollutants. Chemosphere 50 (2003) 71-78
5. V. Arutchelvan, V. Kanakasabai, R. Elangovan, S. Nagaranjan, V. Muralikrishnan, Kinetic of high strength phenol degradation using Bacillus brevis, J. Hazard. Mater., in press.
6. G. Vazquez, C. Youssef, J. Waissman, Two-step modeling of the biodegradation of phenol by an acclimted activated sludge, Chem. Eng. J., in press.
7. Uygur A., and Kargi F. Phenol inhibition of biological nutrient removal in a four-step sequencing batch reactor. Process Biochem. 39 (2004) 2123-2128
8. Buitron G., Gonzalez A., and Lopez-Marin L.M. Biodegradation of phenolic compounds by an acclimated activated sludge and isolated bacteria. Water. Sci. Technol. 37 (1998) 371-378
9. Lante A., Crapisi A., Krastanov A., and Spettoli P. Biodegradation of phenols by laccase immobilised in a membrane reactor. Process Biochem. 36 (2000) 51-58
10. ® in a packed-bed reactor. J. Biotechnol. 97 (2002) 1-11
11. Margesin R., Fonteyne P.A., and Redl B. Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by Rhodococcus spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts. Res. Microbiol. 156 (2005) 68-75
12. Morsen H., and Rehm J. Degradation of phenol by defined mixed culture immobilized by adsorption on activated carbon and sintered glass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33 (1990) 206-212
13. B. Marrot, A. Barrios Martinez, P. Moulin, N. Roche, Biodegradation of high phenol concentration by activated sludge in an immersed bioreactor, Bio. Eng. J., in press.
14. Kumar A., and Kumar S. Biodegradation kinetics of phenol and catechol using Pseudomonas putida MTCC1194. Bio. Eng. J. 22 (2004) 151-159
15. Pawlowsky U., and Howell J.A. Mixed culture biooxidation of phenol. Determination of kinetic parameters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 15 (1973) 889-896
16. Szetela R.W., and Winnicki T.Z. A novel method for determining the parameters of microbial kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23 (1981) 1485-1490
17. Kumaran P., and Paruchuri Y.L. Kinetics of phenol biotransformation. Water. Res. 31 (1997) 11-22
18. Adamo P.D.D., Rozich A.F., and Daudy A.F. Analysis of growth data with inhibitory carbon sources. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (1984) 397-402
19. Laitinen N., Luonsi A., Levanen E., and Nystrom M. Effect of backflushing conditions on ultrafiltration of board industry wastewaters with ceramic membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 25 (2001) 323-331
20. Laitinen N., Michaud D., Piquet C., Teilleria N., Luonsi A., Levanen E., and Nystrom M. Effect of filtration conditions and backflushing on ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of board industry wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 24 (2001) 319-328
21. Ramirez J.A., and Davis R.H. Application of cross-flow microfiltration with rapid backpulsing to wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. (1998) 179-197
22. Sondhi R., and Bhave R. Role of backpulsing in fouling minimization in crossflow filtration with ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 186 (2001) 41-52
23. Levesley J.A., and Hoare M. The effect of high frequency backflushing on the microfiltration of yeast homogenate suspensions for the recovery of soluble proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 29-39
24. Srijaroonrat P., Julien E., and Aurelle Y. Unstable secondary oil/water emulsion treatment using ultrafiltration: fouling control by backflushing. J. Membr. Sci. 159 (1999) 11-20
25. Cakl J., Bauer I., Dolecek P., and Mikulasek P. Effects of backflushing conditions on permeate flux in membrane crossflow microfiltration of oil emulsion. Desalination 127 (2000) 189-219
26. Choo K.H., and Lee C.H. Membrane fouling mechanisms in the membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor. Water Res. 30 (1996) 1771-1780
27. Espinasse B., Bacchin P., and Aimar P. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration. Desalination 146 (2002) 91-96