Critical flux and rejection behaviour of non-circular-channelled membranes. Influence of some operating conditions

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 212-219

  Chiu, T Y ^a   Lara Dominguez, M V ^a   James, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical flux; Membrane performance; Non circular multi channelled membrane; Organic feed; Wastewater reuse

Indexed keywords

DESALINATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICROFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW; WASTEWATER;

CRITICAL FLUX; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; NON-CIRCULAR MULTI-CHANNELLED MEMBRANE; ORGANIC FEED; WASTEWATER REUSE;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

EID: 33646836066     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.11.028     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AlMalack M.H., and Anderson G.K. Use of microfiltration in wastewater treatment. Water Res. 31 (1997) 3064-3072
2. Jacangelo J.G., Trussell R.R., and Watson M. Role of membrane technology in drinking water treatment in the United States. Desalination 113 (1997) 119-127
3. Reith C., and Bikehead B. Membranes enabling the affordable and cost effective reuse of wastewater as an alternative source. Desalination 117 (1998) 203-210
4. Adham S., Trussell R., Gagliardo P., Weibberg K., and Richardson T. Development of an innovative advanced treatment system for indirect potable reuse. Proceedings of the IDA World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse, vol. II. Madrid, Spain (1997) 503-507
5. Conklin R., Dunivin W.R., Herberg J.D., and Leslie G.L. Advanced treatment using microfiltration and reverse osmosis reclaim secondary effluent in Orange County California. Proceedings of the 16th Federal Convention Australian Water and Wastewater Association. Sydney, Australia (1996)
6. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., and Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 100 (1995) 259-272
7. Le-Clech P., Jefferson B., and Judd S.J. Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 117-129
8. Ognier S., Wisniewski C., and Grasmick A. Influence of macromolecule adsorption during filtration of a membrane bioreactor mixed liquor suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 27-37
9. Madaeni S.S., Fane A.G., and Wiley D.E. Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 74 (1999) 539-543
10. Chang I.S., Gander M., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 79 (2001) 183-188
11. Gander M.A., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Membrane bioreactors for use in small wastewater treatment plants: membrane materials and effluent quality. Water Sci. Technol. 41 (2000) 205-211
12. Chang I.S., Le-Clech P., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 128 (2002) 1018-1029
13. Xu N., Xing W., Xu N., and Shi J. Study on ceramic membrane bioreactor with turbulence promoter. Sep. Purif. Technol. 32 (2003) 403-410
14. OECD, OECD Guidelines for Testing Chemicals, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1993 (Guideline 302A & 303A).
15. Christofi N., Aspichueta E., Dalzell D., De la Sota A., Etxebarria J., Fernandes T., Gutierrez M., Morton J., Obst U., and Schmellenkamp P. Congruence in the performance of model nitrifying activated sludge plants located in Germany, Scotland and Spain. Water Res. 37 (2003) 177-187
16. M.V. Lara-Dominguez, A.E. James, Analysis of sludge conditioning, in: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, Glasgow, UK (submitted for publication).
17. 2 suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 254 (2005) 295-301
18. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Section 5210, 18th ed., American Public Health Association Water Works Association, American Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 5.1-5.6.
19. Chiu T.Y., and James A.E. Preprints of 10th Aachen Membrane Colloquium (2005), Aachen, Germany pp. 361-366
20. Bacchin P., Aimar P., and Sanchez V. Model for colloidal fouling of membranes. AIChE J. 41 (1995) 368-376
21. Harmant P., and Aimar P. Coagulation of colloids in a boundary layer during cross-flow filtration. Colloids Surf. A 138 (1998) 217-230
22. Defrance L., and Jaffrin M.Y. Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 152 (1999) 203-210
23. Thomassen J.K., Faraday D.B.F., Underwood B.O., and Cleaver J.A.S. The effect of varying transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity on the microfiltration fouling of a model beer. Sep. Purif. Technol. 41 (2005) 91-100
24. Belfort G., Davis R.H., and Zydney A.L. The behaviour of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96 (1994) 1-58
25. Mercier-Bonin M., and Fonade C. Air-sparged microfiltration of enzyme/yeast mixtures: determination of optimal conditions for enzyme recovery. Desalination 148 (2002) 171-176
26. Thomas D.G. Forced convection mass transfer in hyperfiltration at high fluxes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 12 (1973) 396-405
27. Schwinge J., Wiley D.E., and Fletcher D.F. A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules. Desalination 146 (2002) 195-201
28. Karniadakis G.E., Mikic B.B., and Patera A.T. Minimum-dissipation transport enhancement by flow destabilization: Reynolds' analogy revisited. J. Fluid Mech. 192 (1988) 365
29. Massey B.S. Mechanics of Fluids (1989), Chapman & Hall, London
30. Gordon J.A., and Jencks W.P. Biochemistry 2 (1963) 47
31. Flemming H.-C., Wingender J., Moritz R., Borchard W., and Mayer C. In: Keevil C.W., Godfree A., Holt D., and Dow C. (Eds). Biofilms in the Aquatic Environment (1999), Royal Chemical Society, London 1
32. Liao B.Q., Allen D.G., Leppard G.G., Droppo I.G., and Liss S.N. Interparticle interactions affecting the stability of sludge flocs. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 249 (2002) 372-380
33. Russotti G., Osawa A.E., Sitrin R.D., Buckland B.C., Adams W.R., and Lee S.S. Pilot-scale harvest of recombinant yeast employing microfiltration: a case study. J. Biotechnol. 42 (1995) 235-246
34. Youravong W., Lewis M.J., and Grandison A.S. Critical flux in ultrafiltration of skimmed milk. Trans. IChemE 81 (2003) 303-308
35. Chen V. Performance of partially permeable microfiltration membranes under low fouling conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 147 (1998) 265-278
36. Wu D., Howell H.J., and Field F.W. Critical flux measurement for model colloids. J. Membr. Sci. 152 (1999) 89-98
37. Chen V., Fane A.G., Madaeni S., and Wenten I.G. Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 125 (1997) 109-122
38. 2 particles. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 331-341
39. Gan Q., and Allen S.J. Crossflow microfiltration of a primary sewage effluent - solids retention efficiency and flux enhancement. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 74 (1999) 693-699
40. Chiemchaisri C., Wong Y.K., Urase T., and Yamamoto K. Organic stabilization and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 25 (1992) 231
41. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., and Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review. Water Res. 38 (2004) 2795-2809