Sensory evaluation and electronic tongue for sensing flavored mineral water taste attributes

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 78, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Sipos, László ^a   Gere, Attila ^a   Szöllosi, Dániel ^a   Kovács, Zoltán ^a   Kókai, Zoltán ^a   Fekete, András ^a  

^a Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Electronic tongue; Flavored mineral water; Multivariate statistics; Prediction; Sensory analysis

Indexed keywords

FLAVORING AGENT; FOOD ADDITIVE; MINERAL WATER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CONSUMER; CYMBOPOGON; ELECTRONIC NOSE; ELECTRONIC TONGUE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FLAVORED MINERAL WATER; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ELECTRONIC TONGUE; FLAVORED MINERAL WATER; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS; PREDICTION; SENSORY ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CYMBOPOGON; ELECTRONIC NOSE; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; FOOD ADDITIVES; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; FRUIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINERAL WATERS; ODORS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885400040     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12178     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AlphaMOS. 2002. αAstree sensor technical note. Toulouse, France: Alpha MOS.
2. AlphaMOS. 2003. αAstree electronic tongue user manual. Toulouse, France: Alpha MOS.
3. Bleibaum RN, Stone H, Tan T, Labreche S, Saint-Martin E, Isz S. 2002. Comparison of sensory and consumer results with electronic nose and tongue sensors for apple juices. Food Qual Prefer 13:409-22.
4. Brereton RG. 2009. Chemometrics for pattern recognition. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 479-92 pp.
5. Brockhoff PB. 2003. Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling. Food Qual Prefer 14:425-43.
6. Dahl T, Næs T. 2006. A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalized canonical analysis. Comput Stat Data An 50:3086-98.
7. Dahl T, Tomic O, Wold JP, Næs T. 2008. Some new tools for visualizing multi-way sensory data. Food Qual Prefer 19:103-13.
8. Echeverria G, Lara I, Fuentes T, Lopez ML, Graell J, Puy J. 2004. Assessment of relationships between sensory and instrumental quality of controlled-atmosphere-stored 'Fuji' apples by multivariate analysis. J Food Sci 69:368-75.
9. Gower JC, Hand DJ. Biplots. London: Chapman & Hall. 11-22 pp.
10. Héberger K, Csomós E, Simon-Sarkadi L. 2003. Principal component and linear discriminant analyses of free amino acids and biogenic amines in Hungarian wines. J Agric Food Chem 51:8055-60.
11. ISO. Sensory analysis: general guidance for the design of test rooms. Intl. Standard 8589:2007.
12. ISO. Sensory analysis: general guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected and expert assessors. Intl. Standard 8586:2011.
13. ISO. Sensory analysis-Methodology: general guidance for establishing a sensory profile. Intl. Standard 13299:2003.
14. ISO. Sensory analysis-Methodology: general guidance. Intl. Standard 6658:2005.
15. Kántor DB, Hitka G, Fekete A, Balla Cs. 2008. Electronic tongue for sensing taste changes with apricots during storage. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 131:43-7.
16. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 1998. Sensory evaluation of food. Principals and practices. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall, 234-7 pp.
17. Næs T, Isaksson T, Fearn T, Davies T. 2002. User friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification. Chichester, U.K.: NIR Publications. 155-76 pp.
18. Næs T, Brockhoff PB, Tomic O. 2010. Statistics for sensory and consumer science. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.11-34 pp. 193-245 pp.
19. Olafsdottir G, Chanie E, Westad F, Jonsdottir R, Thalmann CR, Bazzo S, Labreche S, Marcq P, Lundby F, Haugen JE. 2005. Prediction of microbial and sensory quality of cold smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by electronic nose. J Food Sci 70:563-74.
20. Qin OY, Zhao JW, Chen QS, Lin H, Huang XY. 2011. Study on classification of soy sauce by electronic tongue technique combined with artificial neural network. J Food Sci 76:523-7.
21. Rudnitskaya A, Polshin E, Kirsanov D, Lammertyn J, Nicolai B, Saison D, Delvaux FR, Delvaux F, Legin A. 2009. Instrumental measurement of beer taste attributes using an electronic tongue. Anal Chim Acta 646:111-8.
22. Taniguchi A, Naito Y, Maeda N, Sato Y, Ikezaki H. 1999. Development of a monitoring system for water quality using a taste sensor. Sensor Mater 11:437-46.
23. Toko K. 2005. Biomimetic sensor technology. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 119-24 pp.
24. Toko K, Iyota T, Mizota Y, Matsuno T, Yoshioka T, Doi T, Iiyama S, Kato T, Yamafuji K, Watanabe R. 1995. Heat effect on the taste of milk studied using a taste sensor. Jpn J Appl Phys 1 34:6287-91.
25. Tomic O, Luciano G, Nilsen A, Hyldig G, Lorensen K, Næs T. 2010. Analyzing sensory panel performance in proficiency tests using the PanelCheck software. Eur Food Res Technol 230:497-511.