Perceptions of environmental compensation in different scientific fields

International Journal of Environmental Studies

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 611-628

  Persson, Jesper ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Offset; Participation; Perception; Professional

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDES; ENVIRONMENTAL COMPENSATION; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; OFFSET; PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS;

POLLUTION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 84885355998     PISSN: 00207233     EISSN: 10290400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2013.835526     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Darbi, M., Ohlenburg, H., Herberg, A., Skambracks, D., and Herbert, M., 2009, International Approaches to Compensation for Impacts on Biodiversity: Final Report, (Dresden: Leibniz Institute, Berlin University of Technology).
2. McKenney, B., 2005, Environmental Offset Policies, Principles, and Methods: A Review of Selected Legislative Frameworks (Radolfzell: Biodiversityneutralinitiative).
3. Rundcrantz, K. and Skärbäck, E., 2003, Environmental compensation in planning: a review of five different countries with major emphasis on the German system. European Environment, 13(4), 204-226.
4. BBOP, 2009, Biodiversity Offset Design Handbook (Washington: Buisiness and Biodiversity Offset programme).
5. Beder, S., 2006, Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (Sterling: Earthscan).
6. Persson, J., 2011, Att förstå miljökompensation [To Understand Environmental Compensation] [in Swedish] (Göteborg: Melica Media).
7. Cowell, R., 1997, Stretching the limits: environmental compensation, habitat creation and sustainable development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(3), 292-306.
8. Rohan, M.J., 2000, A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255-277.
9. Schwartz, S.H., 1992, Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: M. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (New York: Academic Press), Vol. 25, 1-65
10. Keeney, R.L., 1992, Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University).
11. Kempton, W., Boster, J.S. and Hartley, J.A., 1995, Environmental Values in American Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
12. Mitchell, A., 1983, The Nine American Lifestyles: Who We Are and Where We're Going (New York: Macmillan).
13. Morgan, R.K., 1998, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Methodological Perspective (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
14. Firth, L.J., 1998, Professional practice. Role of values in public decision-making: where is the fit? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(4), 325-329.
15. O'Brien, W.E., 2002, Continuity in a changing environmental discourse: film depictions of corps of engineers projects in South Florida. Geo Journal, 69, 135-149.
16. Pim, V., et al., 2010, Stakeholder value orientations in water management. Society and Natural Resources, 23(9), 805-821.
17. Bourguignon, E., 1979, Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences (New York: Holt).
18. Blåsjö, M., 2004, Studenters skrivande i två kunskapsbyggande miljöer [Students' Writing in Two Knowledge-constructing Settings] [in Swedish]. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).
19. Cherryholmes, C.H., 1992, Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 13-17.
20. Corbett, J.B., 2006, Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages (Washington, DC: Island Press).
21. Cowell, R., 2000, Environmental compensation and the mediation of environmental change: making capital out of Cardiff Bay. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(5), 689-710.
22. Cuperus, R., Bakermans, M.M.G.J.,Udo De Haes, H.A. and Canters,K.J., 2001, Ecological compensation in Dutch highway planning. Environmental Management, 27(1), 75-89.
23. Healey, P. and Shaw, T., 1994, Changing meanings of 'environment' in the British planning system. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(4), 425-438.
24. Larsson, P., 2007, Kompensationsprincipens användning: Lägesbeskrivning och diskussionsunderlag [The use of Compensation as a Principle: State and Basis for Making Decisions] [in Swedish] (Stockholm: Naturskyddsföreningen Stockholms län).
25. Norton, D.A., 2009, Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework. Environmental Management, 43(4), 698-706.
26. Persson, J., 2006, Theoretical reflections on the connection between environmental assessment methods and conflict. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(7), 605-613.
27. O'Riordan, T., 1976, Environmentalism. Research in Planning and Design (London: Pion).
28. Austen, E. and Hanson, A., 2008, Identifying wetland compensation principles and mechanisms for Atlantic Canada using a delphi approach. Wetlands, 28(3), 640-655.
29. Villarroya, A., Persson, J. and Puig, J. n.d., Ecological compensation: from general guidance and expertise to specific proposals for road developments. Resubmitted to the Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
30. Federal Register, 2000, Federal Guidance on the Use of In-Lieu-Fee Arrangements for Compensatory Mitigation Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act; Notice, (Washington: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers), pp. 66914-66917.
31. Ketola, M., Malin, K.,Nyrölä, L. andSuvantola, L., 2009, Kompensaation mahdollisuudet liikennehankkeissa [Compensation in Traffic Projects], Ympäristöministeriö, Suomen Ympäristö [in Finnish] (Helsinki: Miljöministeriet, Finlands miljöcentral).
32. Barrow, C.J., 1997, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction (London: Arnold).
33. Wathern, P., 1988, Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory And Practice (London: Allen & Unwin).
34. IAIA. International Association for Impact Assessment homepage, 2009. Available online at: http://www.iaia.org/ (accessed 4 August 2009).
35. Mmom, P.C. and Igwe, C.F., 2011, An assessment of Nigerian stakeholders' the perception of environmental offset as mitigation measures and its' implication for sustainable industrial development in Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 314-319.
36. Naess, P., 1994, Normative planning theory and sustainable development. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 11(3), 145-167.
37. Sager, T., 1994, Communicative Planning Theory (Aldershot: Avebury).
38. Buergin, R. and Kessler, C., 2000, Intrusions and exclusions: democratization in Thailand in the context of environmental discourses and resource conflicts. GeoJournal, 52(1), 71-80.
39. Hays, S.P., 1959, Conservation and The Gospel Of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Moment, 1890-1920. Harvard Historical Monographs, 40 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
40. Killingsworth, M.J. and Palmer, J.S., 1992, The environmental impact statement and the rhetoric of democracy. In: L.M. Benton and R.J. Shot (Eds.) Environmental Discourse and Practice (Malden: Blackwell), pp. 156-160.
41. Throgmorton, J.A. 1993, Planning as a rhetorical activity: survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal - American Planning Association, 59(3), 334-346.
42. Snell, T. and Cowell, R., 2006, Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4), 359-376.
43. Thomas, I., 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia: Theory and Practice (Sidney: The Federation Press).
44. Webler, T., Tuler, S. and Krueger, R., 2001, What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27(3), 435-450.