Stakeholder value orientations in water management

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 805-821

  Pim, Vugteveen ^a,b   Lenders, H J Rob ^a,b   Devilee, Jeroen L A ^c   Leuven, Rob S E W ^a,b   van der Veeren, Rob J H M ^b,d   Wiering, Mark A ^e   Hendriks, A Jan ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b C o WL Delft Hydraulics   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d Centre for Water Management   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Affective values; Cognitive values; Ethical values; Integrated water management; Q methodology; Stakeholder orientations

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY STRATEGY; PSYCHOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77954695934     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920903496952     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barry, J., and J. Proops. 1999. Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol. Econ. 28(3):337-345.
2. Blatter, J., and H. Ingram, eds. 2001. Reflections on water. New approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Brown, S. R. 1980. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Colorado Institute of Public Policy. 2006. Water in 2025. Beliefs and values as a means for cooperation. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
5. Dutch National Commission on IWM. 2000. Waterbeleid voor de 21e eeuw. Geef water de ruimte en de aandacht die het verdient [in Dutch]. Basic report. The Hague, the Netherlands: Commissie Waterbeheer 21e eeuw.
6. Dietz, T., A. Fitzgerald, and R. Shwom. 2005. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources 30:335-372.
7. Disco, C. 2002. Remaking "nature." The ecological turn in Dutch water management. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 27(2):206-235.
8. Doody, D. G., P. Kearney, J. Barry, R. Moles, and B. O'Regan. 2009. Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators. Ecol. Indicators 9(6):1129-1137.
9. Focht, W. 2002. Assessment and management of policy conflict in the Illinois River watershed in Oklahoma: An application of Q Methodology [1]. Int. J. Public Admin. 25(11): 1311-1349.
10. Gabr, H. S. 2004. Perception of urban waterfront aesthetics along the Nile in Cairo, Egypt. Coastal Manage. 32:155-171.
11. Gagnon Thompson, S. C., and M. A. Barton. 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14(2):149-157.
12. Hitlin, S., and J. A. Piliavin. 2004. Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30(1):359-393.
13. Holling, C. S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390-405.
14. Jeffrey, P., and M. Gearey. 2006. Integrated water resources management: Lost on the road from ambition to realisation? Water Sci. Technol. 53(1):1-8.
15. Keeney, R. L., W. von Detlof, and T. Eppel. 1990. Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions. Manage. Science 36(9):1011-1030.
16. Lenders, R. H. J., and L. Knippenberg. 2005. The temporal and social dimensions of river rehabilitation: Towards a multi-dimensional research perspective. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. Large Rivers 15(1-4):119-131.
17. Leuven, R. S. E. W., A. J. M. Smits, and P. H. Nienhuis. 2000. From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin management. In New approaches to river management, ed. A. J. M. Smits, P. H. Nienhuis, and R. S. E. W. Leuven, 329-347. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys.
18. Lockwood, M. 1999. Humans valuing nature: Synthesising insights from philosophy, psychology and economics. Environ. Values 8(3):381-402.
19. McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. 66. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Mostert, E. 2006. Integrated water resources management in the Netherlands: How concepts function. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 135:19-27.
21. NRLO AWT & RMNO. 2000. Over stromen. Kennis-en innovatieopgaven voor een water- rijk Nederland [in Dutch]. The Hague, the Netherlands: NRLO AWT & RMNO.
22. Pahl-Wostl, C. 2002. Towards sustainability in the water sector-The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat. Sci. Res. Across Boundaries 64(4):394-411.
23. Pahl-Wostl, C., E. Mostert, and D. Tàbara. 2008. The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol. Society 13(1):24.
24. PQMethod. 2002. v. 2.11. The QMethod Page. http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~schmolck/ qmethod (accessed 7 April 2007).
25. Raadgever, G. T., E. Mostert, and N. C. van de Giesen. 2008. Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 12(4):1097-1109.
26. Redman, C. L. 1999. Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2(4):296-298.
27. Robbins, P., and R. Krueger. 2000. Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. Prof. Geogr. 52(4):636-648.
28. Rohan, M. J. 2000. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality Social Psychol. Rev. 4(3):255-277.
29. Satterfield, T. 2001. In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environ. Values 10(3):331-360.
30. Schultz, P. W. 2001. The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J. Environ. Psychol. 21(4):327-339.
31. Schwartz, S. H. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Appl. Psychol. 48(1):23-47.
32. Schwartz, S. H., and W. Bilsky. 1987. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J. Personality Social Psychol. 53(3):550-562.
33. Steelman, T. A., and L. A. Maguire. 1999. Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 18(3):361-388.
34. Swart, J. A. A., H. J. van der Windt, and J. Keulartz. 2001. Valuation of nature in conser- vation and restoration. Restoration Ecol. 9(2):230-238.
35. World Water Assessment Programme. 2009. The United Nations world water development report 3: Water in a changing world. UN Water. Paris: UNESCO; London: Earthscan.
36. Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits, and R. S. E. W. Leuven. 2005. Flood defense in the Netherlands. A new era, a new approach. Water Int. 30(1):76-87.