Comparison of methods for detoxification of spruce hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Guo, Xiang ^a   Cavka, Adnan ^a,b   Jönsson, Leif J ^a,b   Hong, Feng ^a  

^a DONGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Detoxification methods; Gluconacetobacter xylinus; Norway spruce hydrolysate

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ACTIVATED CARBON; ALDEHYDE; ALIPHATIC CARBOXYLIC ACID; AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE; ARABINOSE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CELLULOSE; FORMIC ACID; FURFURAL; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; ION EXCHANGE RESIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MANNOSE; NANOMATERIAL; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE; REDUCING AGENT; SODIUM DITHIONITE; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; SODIUM SULFITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLOSE;

ANION EXCHANGE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL GROWTH; CARBOHYDRATE SYNTHESIS; CATION EXCHANGE; CELL VIABILITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; FERMENTATION; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA JECORINA; NONHUMAN; NORWAY SPRUCE; PH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUGAR INTAKE; WOOD CHIP;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; PICEA;

EID: 84885341645     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-93     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gama M, Gatenholm P, Klemm D. Bacterial nanocellulose: a sophisticated multifunctional material 2012, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
2. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1-12. 10.1021/bm060620d, 17206781.
3. Jiang G, Qiao J, Hong F. Application of phosphoric acid and phytic acid-doped bacterial cellulose as novel proton-conducting membranes to PEMFC. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012, 37:9182-9192.
4. Gao Q, Shen X, Lu X. Regenerated bacterial cellulose fibers prepared by the NMMO · H2O process. Carbohyd Polym 2011, 83:1253-1256.
5. Hong F, Zhu YX, Yang G, Yang XX. Wheat straw acid hydrolysate as a potential cost-effective feedstock for production of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2011, 86:675-680.
6. Chen L, Hong F, Yang XX, Han SF. Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism. Bioresour Technol 2013, 135:464-468.
7. Hong F, Qiu K. An alternative carbon source from konjac powder for enhancing production of bacterial cellulose in static cultures by a model strain Acetobacter aceti subsp. xylinus ATCC 23770. Carbohyd Polym 2008, 72:545-549.
8. Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, Han SF, Yang G, Jönsson LJ. Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 2012, 104:503-508.
9. Cavka A, Guo X, Tang SJ, Winestrand S, Jönsson LJ, Hong F. Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:25. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-25, 3610104, 23414733.
10. Skogsstatistisk Årsbok 2012, Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen, http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/en/.
11. Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant NO. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:16. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-16, 3574029, 23356676.
12. Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Lopes S, Parajó JC, Pereira H, Gi{dotless}́rio FM. Evaluation of the detoxification of brewery's spent grain hydrolysate for xylitol production by Debaryomyces hansenii CCMI 941. Process Biochem 2005, 40:1215-1223.
13. Alriksson B, Cavka A, Jönsson LJ. Improving the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:1254-1263. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.037, 20822900.
14. Cavka A, Alriksson B, Ahnlund M, Jönsson LJ. Effect of sulfur oxyanions on lignocellulose-derived fermentation inhibitors. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2592-2599. 10.1002/bit.23244, 21702027.
15. Parajó J, Domínguez H, Domínguez J. Xylitol production from Eucalyptus wood hydrolysates extracted with organic solvents. Process Biochem 1997, 32:599-604.
16. Larsson S, Reimann A, Nilvebrant NO, Jönsson LJ. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1999, 77:91-103.
17. Nilvebrant NO, Reimann A, Larsson S, Jönsson LJ. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates with ion-exchange resins. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2001, 91-93:35-49.
18. Carvalho WD, Canilha L, Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Morales MLV, Solenzal AIN. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate with ion-exchange resins for xylitol production by calcium alginate-entrapped cells. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2004, 79:863-868.
19. Alriksson B, Horváth IS, Sjöde A, Nilvebrant NO, Jönsson LJ. Ammonium hydroxide detoxification of spruce acid hydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2005, 121-124:911-922.
20. Alriksson B, Sjöde A, Nilvebrant NO, Jönsson LJ. Optimal conditions for alkaline detoxification of dilute-acid lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2006, 130:599-611.
21. Bruijn JM, Kieboom APG, Bekkum H, Poel PW. Reactions of monosaccharides in aqueous alkaline solutions. Sugar Technol Rev 1986, 13:21-52.
22. Cantarella M, Cantarella L, Gallifuoco A, Spera A, Alfani F. Comparison of different detoxification methods for steam-exploded poplar wood as a substrate for the bioproduction of ethanol in SHF and SSF. Process Biochem 2004, 39:1533-1542.
23. Chandel AK, Kapoor RK, Singh A, Kuhad RC. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501. Bioresour Technol 2007, 98:1947-1950. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.047, 17011776.
24. Intorne AC, De Oliveira MVV, Pereira LM, De Souza Filho GA. Essential role of the czc determinant for cadmium, cobalt and zinc resistance in Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAI 5. Int Microbiol 2012, 15:69-78.
25. Sutherland JP, Bayliss AJ, Braxton DS. Predictive modelling of growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7: the effects of temperature, pH and sodium chloride. Int J Food Microbiol 1995, 25:29-49. 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00082-H, 7599029.
26. Nagata S, Maekawa Y, Ikeuchi T, Wang YB, Ishida A. Effect of compatible solutes on the respiratory activity and growth of Escherichia coli K-12 under NaCl stress. J Biosci Bioeng 2002, 94:384-389.
27. Wadskog I, Adler L. Ion homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under NaCl stress. Yeast stress responses: volume 1 2003, 201-239. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Hohmann S, Mager W.
28. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, Wells ML, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with Lime. Biotechnol Prog 2001, 17:287-293. 10.1021/bp0001720, 11312706.
29. Dahman Y, Jayasuriya K, Kalis M. Potential of biocellulose nanofibers production from agricultural renewable resources: preliminary study. Applied Biochem Biotechnol 2010, 162:1647-1659.
30. Mikkelsen D, Flanagan BM, Dykes GA, Gidley MJ. Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J Appl Microbiol 2009, 107:576-583. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x, 19302295.
31. Keshk S, Sameshima K. Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr J Biotechnol 2005, 4:478-482.
32. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 1998, 87:169-174.
33. Deppenmeier U. The unique biochemistry of methanogenesis. Progs Nucl Acid Res Mol Biol 2002, 71:223-283.
34. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Physiological effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000, 53:701-708. 10.1007/s002530000328, 10919330.
35. Vandamme EJ, De Baets S, Vanbaelen A, Joris K, De Wulf P. Improved production of bacterial cellulose and its application potential. Polym Degrad Stabil 1998, 59:93-99.
36. Jönsson LJ, Palmqvist E, Nilvebrant NO, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 49:691-697.
37. Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Navarro JM. Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1996, 19:220-225.
38. Mussatto SI, Roberto IC. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Bioresour Technol 2004, 93:1-10. 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.005, 14987714.
39. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 66:10-26. 10.1007/s00253-004-1642-2, 15300416.
40. Larsson S, Quintana-Sáinz A, Reimann A, Nilvebrant N-O, Jönsson LJ. The influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen-limited growth and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84-86:617-632.