The Co-Development of Looking Dynamics and Discrimination Performance

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 837-852

  Perone, Sammy ^a   Spencer, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic neural fields; Looking behavior; Memory development

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; INFANT; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION; VISION;

AGE FACTORS; ATTENTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INFANT; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84885339565     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034137     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adolph, K. E., Robinson, S. R., Young, J. W., & Gill-Alvarez, F. (2008). What is the shape of developmental change. Psychological Review, 115, 527-543. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.527
2. Bahrick, E., & Pickens, J. (1995). Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: Implications for a four-phase function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 343-371. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1017
3. Bashinski, H. S., Werner, J. S., & Rudy, J. W. (1985). Determinants of infant visual fixation: Evidence for a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 580-598. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(85)90058-X
4. Brannon, E. M., Sumarga, S., & Libertus, K. (2007). Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. Developmental Science, 10, 770-777. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00635.x
5. Cohen, L. B. (1972, February). A two process model of infant visual attention. Paper presented at the Merrill Palmer Conference on Research and Teaching of Infancy Development, Detroit, Michigan.
6. Colombo, J. (1995). On the neural mechanisms underlying developmental and individual differences in visual fixation in infancy: Two hypotheses. Developmental Review, 15, 97-135. doi:10.1006/drev.1995.1005
7. Colombo, J., & Mitchell, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in early visual attention: Fixation time and information processing. In J. Colombo & J. Fagen (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, and prediction (pp. 193-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Franchak, J. M., Kretch, K. S., Soska, K. C., & Adolph, K. E. (2011). Head-mounted eye tracking: A new method to describe infant looking. Child Development, 82, 1738-1750. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01670.x
9. Gilmore, R. O., & Thomas, H. (2002). Examining individual differences in infants' habituation patterns using objective quantitative methods. Infant Behavior Development, 25, 399-412. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00142-X
10. Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. O. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 69-95). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
11. Johnson, J. S., Spencer, J. P., Luck, S. J., & Schöner, G. (2009). A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection. Psychological Science, 20, 568-577. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02329.x
12. Johnson, J. S., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2009). A layered neural architecture for the consolidation, maintenance, and updating of representations in visual working memory. Brain Research, 1299, 17-32. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.008
13. Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Largenumber discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396-401. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01453
14. Martin, R. M. (1975). Effects of familiar and complex stimuli on infant attention. Developmental Psychology, 11, 178-185. doi:10.1037/h0076448
15. Mobus, G. E., & Fisher, P. S. (1999). Foraging search at the edge of chaos. In D. Levie, V. R. Brown, & V. T. Shirey (Eds.), Oscillations in neural networks (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Needham, A. (2000). Improvements in object exploration may facilitate the development of object segregation in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 131-156. doi:10.1207/S15327647JCD010201
17. Oakes, L. M., Coppage, D. J., & Dingel, A. (1997). By land or by sea: The role of perceptual similarity in infants' categorization of animals. Developmental Psychology, 33, 396-407.
18. Oden, G. (1981). A fuzzy propositional model of concept structure and use. A case study in object identification. In G. W. Lasker (Ed.), Applied systems and cybernetics (Vol. 6, pp. 2890-2897). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
19. Perone, S., Simmering, V. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2011). Stronger neural dynamics capture developmental changes in infants' visual working memory capacity over development. Developmental Science, 14, 1379-1392. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01083.x
20. Perone, S., & Spencer, J. P. (2013). Autonomy in action: Linking the act of looking to memory formation in infancy via dynamic neural fields. Cognitive Science, 37, 1-60. doi:10.1111/cogs.12010
21. Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-and 4-month-old infants, Perception, 22, 463-475. doi:10.1068/p220463
22. Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuh, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109-1121. doi:10.1068/p3331
23. Robertson, S. S., Bacher, L. F., & Huntington, N. L. (2001). The integration of body movement and attention in young infants. Psychological Science, 12, 523-526. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00396
24. Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2001). Attention and recognition memory in the 1st year of life: A longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 37, 135-151. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.1.135
25. Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2002). Processing speed in the 1st year of life: A longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 895-902. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.895
26. Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2007). Developmental aspects of visual recognition memory in infancy. In L. M. Oakes & P. J. Bauer (Eds.), Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood (pp. 153-178). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12, 339-349. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00786.x
28. Ruff, H. A. (1975). The function of shifting fixations in the visual perception of infants. Child Development, 46, 857-865. doi:10.2307/1128390
29. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996, December 13). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
30. Schöner, G., & Thelen, E. (2006). Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. Psychological Review, 113, 273-299. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.273
31. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009). Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: Capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1698-1725. doi: 10.1037/a0015794
32. Simmering, V. R., & Patterson, R. (2012). Models provide specificity: Testing a proposed mechanism of visual working memory capacity development. Cognitive Development, 27, 419-439. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.001
33. Sirois, S., & Mareschal, D. (2004). An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1352-1362. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304778
34. Skoczenski, A. M., & Norcia, A. M. (1998, February 12). Neural noise limitations on infant visual sensitivity. Nature, 391, 697-700. doi: 10.1038/35630
35. Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamne, V. A. F. (2009). V4 activity predicts strength of visual short-term memory representations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7432-7438. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-09.2009
36. Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., & Johnson, J. S. (2009). Dynamic field theory of embodied cognitive dynamics. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 86-118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0005
37. Spivey, M. S. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D. (2004). From parts to wholes: Mechanisms of development in infant visual object processing. Infancy, 5, 131-151. doi:10.1207/s15327078in0502_2