The role of the imagined user in planning and design narratives

Planning Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 425-441

  Ivory, Chris ^a  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design; imagined user; narrative; planning; urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PROCESS; REGENERATION; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84885211868     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095212470546     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anastacio J,Gidley B,Hart L, et alReflecting realities. Participants' perspectives on integrated communities and sustainable development. The Policy Press; 2000:.
2. Atkinson R.Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration.Urban Studies. 1999;36 (1): 59-72.
3. Atkinson R,Moon G.The City Challenge Initiative: An overview and preliminary assessment.Regional Development Studies. 1994;28 (1): 95-97.
4. Stories of Change: Narrative and Social Movements. Davis JE, ed. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2002:.
5. Davoudi S,Healey PUrban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change. Hambleton RThomas H, ed. London: Chapman; 1995:158-174.
6. Deuten J,Rip A.Narrative infrastructure in product creation processes.Organization. 2000;7 (1): 69-93.
7. Dillon P,Howe T.Design as narrative: Objects, stories and negotiated meaning.International Journal of Art & Design Education. 2003;22 (3): 289-296.
8. Eckstein BStory and Sustainability: Planning, Practice, and Possibility for American Cities. Eckstein BThrogmorton J, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:13-36.
9. Fairclough N.Critical discourse analysis, organizational discourse, and organizational change.Organization Studies. 2005;26 (6): 915-939.
10. Gunder M.Passionate planning for other's desire: Agonistic response to the darker side of planning.Progress in Planning. 2003;60 (3): 235-319.
11. Gunder M.Shaping the planners ego ideal: A Lacanian interpretation of planning education.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2004;23 (3): 299-311.
12. Hart C,Jones K,Manmohan BContested Communities: Experiences, Struggles, Policies. Hoggett P, ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1997:180-199.
13. Healey P.Collaborative planning in perspective.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 101-123.
14. Hillier J.'Agon'ising over consensus - Why Habermasian ideals cannot be real.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
15. Hillier J,Gunder M.Planning fantasies? And exploration of the potential Lacanian framework for understanding development assessment planning.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (3): 225-248.
16. Ivory CJ.Three studies of client and architect interactions: Implications for the innovation process in construction.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2004;16 (4): 514-531.
17. Ivory CJ.'The cult of customer responsiveness': Is design innovation the price of a client-focused construction industry?.Construction Management & Economics. 2005;23 (8): 861-870.
18. Ivory CJ,Alderman N.The imagined user in projects: Articulating competing discourses of space and knowledge work, Ephemera.Theory and Politics in Organisation. 2009;9 (2): 133-151.
19. Jackson C.Social exclusion and gender: Does one size fit all?.European Journal of Development Research. 1999;11 (1): 125-146.
20. Jones P.Urban regeneration's poisoned chalice: Is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy?.Urban Studies. 2003;40 (3): 581-601.
21. Lacoff G,Johnson MMetaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press; 1980:.
22. Law J,Callon MShaping Technology Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Bijker W.Law J., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992:.
23. Lloyd P.Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process.Design Studies. 2000;21 (4): 357-373.
24. Lloyd P,Deasley P.Ethnographic description of design networks.Automation in Construction. 1998;7 (2-3): 101-110.
25. Maggin P.Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography.Qualitative Research. 2007;7 (1): 25-43.
26. McDonnell P,Lloyd P,Valkenburg R.Developing design expertise through the construction of video stories.Design Studies. 2004;25 (5): 509-525.
27. Propp VMorphology of the Folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1968 [1927]:.
28. Schön DMetaphor and Thought. Ortony A, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979:254-283.
29. Schön DThe Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books; 1983:.
30. Stone DPolicy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2002:.
31. Suchman L.Organising alignment: A case of bridge building.Organization. 2000;7 (2): 311-327.
32. SURF (2002) HULME ten years on. Report for Manchester City Council by the Centre for Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures (Final draft). Salford University. Available at: www.surf.salford.ac.uk/cms/resources/uploads/File/Hulme.pdf.
33. Symes M,Pauwels S.The diffusion of innovations in urban design: The case of sustainability in the Hulme development guide.Journal of Urban Design. 2007;4 (1): 97-117.
34. Symes P,Pauwels S.The diffusion of innovations in urban design: The case of sustainability in the Hulme Development Guide.Journal of Urban Design. 1999;4 (1): 97-117.
35. Throgmorton JPlanning as Persuasive Story Telling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago's Electric Future. London: University of Chicago Press; 1996:.
36. Throgmorton J.Planning as persuasive story telling in a global scale web of relationships.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 125-151.
37. Van Dijk T.Imagining future places: How designs co-constitute what is and thus what will influence what will be.Planning Theory. 2011;10 (2): 124-143.
38. Van Hulst M.Story telling, a model of and a model for planning.Planning Theory. 2012;6 (3): 237-262.
39. Zizek SHow to read Lacan. London: Granta Books; 2011:.