Placenta praevia after prior caesarean section: An exploratory case-control study

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 455-458

  Chiu, Tin Lok ^a   Sadler, Lynn ^a   Wise, Michelle R ^b  

^a NATIONAL WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

caesarean section; monofilament suture; placenta praevia; stage of labour

Indexed keywords

SUTURE MATERIAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROTOMY; LABOR STAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PLACENTA PREVIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGEON;

CAESAREAN SECTION; MONOFILAMENT SUTURE; PLACENTA PRAEVIA; STAGE OF LABOUR;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; OBSTETRICS; PLACENTA PREVIA; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SUTURES;

EID: 84885185231     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: 1479828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12098     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fishman SG, Chasen ST, Maheshwari B,. Risk factors for preterm delivery with placenta previa. J Perinat Med 2011; 40: 39-42.
2. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM,. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071-1078.
3. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F,. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 976-980.
4. Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV,. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 771-778.
5. Faiz AS, Ananth CV,. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 175-190.
6. Hadar E, Melamed N, Tzadikevitch-Geffen K, Yogev Y,. Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 735-741.
7. Sung JF, Daniels KI, Brodzinsky L, et al,. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 306.e1-306.e5.
8. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al,. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 917-921.
9. Boyle JG, Gabbe SG,. T and J vertical extensions in low transverse cesarean births. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 238-243.
10. Andrade MG, Weissman R, Reis SR,. Tissue reaction and surface morphology of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006; 17: 949-961.
11. Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M,. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39: 254-260.
12. Ruiz de Adana JC, Hernandez Matias A, Hernandez Bartolome M, et al,. Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1274-1277.
13. NZ Ministry of Health. New Zealand Maternity Clinical Indicators 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2012.