A perspective on optimal leaf stomatal conductance under CO2 and light co-limitations

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 182-183, Issue , 2013, Pages 191-199

  Vico, Giulia ^a   Manzoni, Stefano ^b,c   Palmroth, Sari ^a,c   Weih, Martin ^a   Katul, Gabriel ^b,c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electron transport limited photosynthesis; Leaf gas exchange model; Marginal water use efficiency; Optimization; Rubisco limited photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; LIGHT EFFECT; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84885177545     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. 2 transport in airspaces and mesophyll cells of a silver birch leaf. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25(11):1399-1409.
2. 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytol. 2005, 165(2):351-371.
3. 2: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30(3):258-270.
4. Albert K.R., Mikkelsen T.N., Ro-Poulsen H., Arndal M.F., Michelsen A. Ambient UV-B radiation reduces PSII performance and net photosynthesis in high Arctic Salix arctica. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 73:10-18.
5. 2 in a C-3-C-4 grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 2001, 7(6):693-707.
6. 2 concentration. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16(1).
7. Ball J.T., Woodrow I.E., Berry J.A. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research 1987, 221-224. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. J. Biggins (Ed.).
8. Bernacchi C.J., Singsaas E.L., Pimentel C., Portis A.R., Long S.P. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24(2):253-259.
9. Berninger F., Hari P. Optimal regulation of gas-exchange-evidence from field data. Ann. Bot. 1993, 71(2):135-140.
10. Berninger F., Makela A., Hari P. Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: empirical evidence. Ann. Bot. 1996, 77(5):469-476.
11. Buckley T.N. The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytol. 2005, 168(2):275-291.
12. Buckley T.N., Miller J.M., Farquhar G.D. The mathematics of linked optimisation for water and nitrogen use in a canopy. Silva Fenn. 2002, 36(3):639-669.
13. Cedergreen N., Olesen C.F. Can glyphosate stimulate photosynthesis?. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 96(3):140-148.
14. Colom M.R., Vazzana C. Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003, 49(2):135-144.
15. Cowan I. Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in higher plants. Physiological Plant Ecology II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation 1982, 589-614. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York. O.E. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, H. Ziegler (Eds.).
16. Cowan I. Economics of carbon fixation in higher plants. On the Economy of Plant form and Function 1986, 133-170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. T.J. Givnish (Ed.).
17. Cowan I., Farquhar G.D. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism an environment. Integration of Activity in the Higher Plants. Symposia of the Society of Experimental Biology 1977, 471-505. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D.H. Jennings (Ed.).
18. Damour G., Simonneau T., Cochard H., Urban L. An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33(9):1419-1438.
19. de Boer H.J., Eppinga M.B., Wassen M.J., Dekker S.C. A critical transition in leaf evolution facilitated the Cretaceous angiosperm revolution. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3.
20. 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108(10):4041-4046.
21. 2?. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48:609-639.
22. 2 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 168:168-176.
23. Eamus D., Taylor D.T., Macinnis-Ng C.M.O., Shanahan S., De Silva L. Comparing model predictions and experimental data for the response of stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor to manipulations of cuticular conductance, leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference and temperature: feedback mechanisms are able to account for all observations. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31(3):269-277.
24. 2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE. Glob. Change Biol. 2012, 18(1):223-242.
25. Farquhar G.D. Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1978, 5(6):787-800.
26. 2 assimilation in leaves of C-3. Planta 1980, 149(1):78-90.
27. Fay P.A., Jin V.L., Way D.A., Potter K.N., Gill R.A., Jackson R.B., Polley H.W. Soil-mediated effects of subambient to increased carbon dioxide on grassland productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2(10):742-746.
28. 2 and water-vapor exchange of Pinus-taeda in relation to stomatal behavior-test of an optimization hypothesis. Can. J. For. Res. 1988, 18(2):150-157.
29. 2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106(25):10343-10347.
30. Franks P.J., Cowan I.R., Farquhar G.D. The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20(1):142-145.
31. Friend A.D. PGEN-An integrated model of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and conductance. Ecol. Model. 1995, 77(2-3):233-255.
32. On the Economy of Plant form and Function 1986, 736. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. T.J. Givnish (Ed.).
33. Grantz D.A. Plant-response to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 1990, 13(7):667-679.
34. Hari P., Mäkelä A., Korpilahti E., Holmberg M. Optimal control of gas exchange. Tree Phys. 1986, 2:169-175.
35. Hari P., Mäkelä A., Pohja T. Surprising implications of the optimality hypothesis of stomatal regulation gain support in a field test. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 27(1):77-80.
36. Jones H.G. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY, 428 pp.
37. 2 on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105(3):431-442.
38. Katul G.G., Oren R., Manzoni S., Higgins C., Parlange M.B. Evapotranspiration: a process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil-plant-atmosphere-climate system. Rev. Geophys. 2012, 50.
39. 2-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32(8):968-979.
40. Kirk D.E. Optimal control theory. An Introduction 1970, 452. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
41. 2. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 253(4):638-658.
42. 2O exchange rates. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2011, 151(12):1672-1689.
43. Leuning R. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C-3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18(4):339-355.
44. 2 assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecologia 1994, 99(3-4):201-215.
45. 2 gradient. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222(3):653-665.
46. Manzoni S., Vico G., Katul G., Fay P.A., Polley W., Palmroth S., Porporato A. Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25(3):456-467.
47. Manzoni S., Vico G., Palmroth S., Porporato A., Katul G. Optimality approaches for canopy gas exchange: from theory to emerging properties. Adv. Water Res. 2013, (under rev.).
48. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol. 2001, 149(2):247-264.
49. Medlyn B.E., Dreyer E., Ellsworth D., Forstreuter M., Harley P.C., Kirschbaum M.U.F., Le Roux X., Montpied P., Strassemeyer J., Walcroft A., Wang K., Loustau D. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25(9):1167-1179.
50. Medlyn B.E., Duursma R.A., Eamus D., Ellsworth D.S., Prentice I.C., Barton C.V.M., Crous K.Y., de Angelis P., Freeman M., Wingate L. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17(6):2134-2144.
51. 2 concentration: alternative solutions, alternative interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, (in press). 10.1016/j.agrformet2013.04.019.
52. Meinzer F.C., Hinckley T.M., Ceulemans R. Apparent responses of stomata to transpiration and humidity in a hybrid poplar canopy. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20(10):1301-1308.
53. Monteith J.L. A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18(4):357-364.
54. Mott K.A., Parkhurst D.F. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14(5):509-515.
55. Mott K.A., Peak D. Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36:936-944.
56. Mäkelä A., Berninger F., Hari P. Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: theoretical analysis. Ann. Bot. 1996, 77(5):461-467.
57. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Katul G.G., Pataki D.E., Ewers B.E., Phillips N., Schafer K.V.R. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22(12):1515-1526.
58. 2 and water relations mediated by plant hydraulics. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367(1588):583-600.
59. Palmroth S., Berninger F., Nikinmaa E., Lloyd J., Pulkkinen P., Hari P. Structural adaptation rather than water conservation was observed in Scots pine over a range of wet to dry climates. Oecologia 1999, 121(3):302-309.
60. 2 environments. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111(3):467-477.
61. Polley H.W., Johnson H.B., Mayeux H.S., Malone S.R. Physiology and growth of wheat across a subambient carbon-dioxide gradient. Ann. Bot. 1993, 71(4):347-356.
62. Rabinowitch E. Photosynthesis, 2, Part 1 1951, Intersciences Publishers Inc., New York.
63. Schulze E.D., Buschbom U., Evenari M., Lange O.L., Kappen L. Stomatal response to changes in humidity in plants growing in desert. Planta 1972, 108(3). 259-&.
64. Schymanski S.J., Sivapalan M., Roderick M.L., Hutley L.B., Beringer J. An optimality-based model of the dynamic feedbacks between natural vegetation and the water balance. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45.
65. Sellers P.J., Dickinson R.E., Randall D.A., Betts A.K., Hall F.G., Berry J.A., Collatz G.J., Denning A.S., Mooney H.A., Nobre C.A., Sato N., Field C.B., Henderson-Sellers A. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science 1997, 275(5299):502-509.
66. Thornley J.H.M. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology 1976, Academic Press, London.
67. Turner N.C., Schulze E.D., Gollan T. The response of stomata and leaf gas-exchange to vapor-pressure deficits and soil-water content. 1. Species comparisons at high soil-water contents. Oecologia 1984, 63(3):338-342.
68. 2. Glob. Change Biol. 1999, 5(8):857-867.
69. Weih M., Bonosi L., Ghelardini L., Ronnberg-Wastljung A.C. Optimizing nitrogen economy under drought: increased leaf nitrogen is an acclimation to water stress in willow (Salix spp.). Ann. Bot. 2011, 108(7):1347-1353.
70. Vico G., Manzoni S., Palmroth S., Katul G. Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes. New Phytol. 2011, 192(3):640-652.
71. Wong S.C., Cowan I.R., Farquhar G.D. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 1979, 282(5737):424-426.