The optimal stomatal response to atmospheric CO2 concentration: Alternative solutions, alternative interpretations

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 182-183, Issue , 2013, Pages 200-203

  Medlyn, Belinda E ^a   Duursma, Remko A ^b   De Kauwe, Martin G ^a   Prentice, I Colin ^a,c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Optimisation; Stomatal conductance model

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

EID: 84885310925     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30(3):258-270.
2. 2 concentration. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16(1).
3. Ball J.T., Woodrow I.E., Berry J.A. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research 1987, 221-224. Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. J. Biggins (Ed.).
4. 2] on instantaneous transpiration efficiency at leaf and canopy scales in Eucalyptus saligna. Glob. Change Biol. 2012, 18(2):585-595.
5. Berry J.A., Beerling D.J., Franks P.J. Stomata: key players in the earth system, past and present. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13(3):233-240.
6. Buckley T.N., Turnbull T.L., Adams M.A. Simple models for stomatal conductance derived from a process model: cross-validation against sap flux data. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35(9):1647-1662.
7. Cowan I.R., Farquhar G.D. Stomatal Function in Relation to Leaf Metabolism and Environment. Integration of activity in the higher plant. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 1977, 471-505. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D.H. Jennings (Ed.).
8. Cowan I. Fit, fitter, fittest; where does optimisation fit in?. Silva Fennica 2002, 36(3):745-754.
9. Damour G., Simonneau T., Cochard H., Urban L. An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33(9):1419-1438.
10. 2: a model-data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites. Glob. Change Biol. 2013, 10.1111/gcb.12164.
11. Dewar R.C., Franklin O., Mäkelä A., McMurtrie R.E., Valentine H.T. Optimal function explains forest responses to global change. Bioscience 2009, 59(2):127-139.
12. 2] in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 168:168-176.
13. Farquhar G.D., von Caemmerer S. Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions. Physiological plant ecology II: water relations and carbon assimilation. Encyclopaedia of plant physiology 1982, 549-587. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. O. Lange, P. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, H. Zieger (Eds.).
14. 2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. New Phytol. 2013, 197:1077-1094.
15. 2 enrichment. Plant Cell and Environ. 2002, 25:379-393.
16. Hari P., Makela A., Korpilahti E., Holmberg M. Optimal control of gas exchange. Tree Physiol. 1986, 2(1-3):169-175.
17. Jarvis P.G. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1976, 273:593-610.
18. 2 on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105(3):431-442.
19. 2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29(9):1794-1800.
20. 3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:339-357.
21. 2 assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecology 1994, 99(3-4):201-215.
22. Medlyn B.E. Interactive effects of atmospheric carbon dioxide and leaf nitrogen concentration on canopy light use efficiency: a modeling analysis. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16(1-2):201-209.
23. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol. 2001, 149:247-264.
24. Medlyn B.E., Duursma R.A., Eamus D., Ellsworth D.S., Prentice I.C., Barton C.V.M., Crous K.Y., De Angelis P., Freeman M., Wingate L. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17:2134-2144.
25. 4 grass species. Plant Physiol. 1983, 71:789-796.
26. 2 concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49:443-452.
27. 2 depend on the mesophyll. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32(11):1479-1486.
28. Peak D., Mott K.A. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 34(1):162-178.
29. 2 concentration on stomatal density. New Phytol. 1995, 131:311-327.
30. 2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiol. 1985, 78(4):821-825.