Empirical and optimal stomatal controls on leaf and ecosystem level CO2 and H2O exchange rates

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 151, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1672-1689

  Launiainen, Samuli ^a,b   Katul, Gabriel G ^c   Kolari, Pasi ^b   Vesala, Timo ^b   Hari, Pertti ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ball Berry model; Optimality stomatal hypothesis; Photosynthesis; Scots pine; Stomatal conductance; Transpiration rate

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; EDDY COVARIANCE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FOREST CANOPY; GAS EXCHANGE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; VAPOR PRESSURE;

FINLAND; HYYTIALA; LANSI SUOMEN;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 80054917859     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aalto T. Carbon dioxide exchange of Scots pine shoots as estimated by a biochemical model and cuvette field measurements. Silva Fennica 1998, 32:321-337.
2. Aubinet M., Grelle A., Ibrom A., Rannik Ü., Monchrieff J., Foken T., Kowalski A.S., Martin P.H., Bergibier P., Bernhofer C., Clement R., Elbers J., Granier A., Grünwald T., Morgenstern K., Pilegaard K., Rebmann C., Snicders W., Valentini R., Vesala T. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2000, 30:113-178.
3. Ball J.T., Woodrow I.E., Berry J.A. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosyntehsis Research 1987, 221-224. Martinus Nijhoff, CZ Zoetermeer, Netherlands. J. Biggens (Ed.).
4. Baldocchi D.D., Meyers T. On using eco-physiological, micrometeorologial and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1998, 90:1-25.
5. Bash J., Walker T.J., Katul G.G., Jones M.R., Nimetz E., Robarge W. Estimation of in-canopy ammonia sources and sinks in a fertilized Zea mays field. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:1683-1689.
6. Berninger F., Hari P. Optimal regulation of gas-exchange - evidence from field data. Ann. Bot. - Lond. 1993, 71:135-140.
7. Blackman F.F. Experimental researches on vegetable assimilation and respiration II. On the paths of gaseous exchange between aerial leaves and atmosphere. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1895, 186:503-562.
8. Campbell G.S., Norman J.M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics 1998, Springer, p. 281. 2nd ed.
9. Cardon Z.G., Mott K.A., Berry J.A. Dynamics of patchy stomatal movements, and their contribution to steady-state and oscillating stomatal conductance calculated with gas-exchange techniques. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17:995-1008.
10. Collatz G.J., Ball J.T., Grivet C., Berry J.A. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration - a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1991, 54:107-136.
11. Collatz G.J., Ribas-Carbo M., Berry J.A. Coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for leavesof C4 plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1992, 19:519-538.
12. Cowan I.R. Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv. Bot. Res. 1977, 4:117-228.
13. Cowan I.R. Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in higher plants. Physiological Plant Ecology II; Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation 1982, 589-613. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, H. Ziegler (Eds.).
14. Cowan I.R., Farquhar G.D. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1977, 31:471-505.
15. Duursma R.A., Kolari P., Perämäki M., Nikinmaa E., Hari P., Delzon S., Loustau D., Ilvesniemi H., Pumpanen J., Mäkelä A. Predicting the decline in daily maximum transpiration rate of two pine stands during drought based on constant minimum leaf water potential and plant hydraulic conductivity. Tree Phys. 2008, 28:265-276.
16. 2 assimilation and stomatal limitations in a Pinus taeda canopy with varying climate. Tree Phys. 2000, 20:425-435.
17. 2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected?. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 20:537-557.
18. Fan L.M., Zhao Z.X., Assmann S.M. Guard cells: a dynamic signaling model. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7:537-554.
19. 3 species. Planta 1980, 149:78-90.
20. Finnigan J. Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2000, 32:519-571.
21. Givnish T.J., Vermeij G.J. Sizes and shapes of liane leaves. Am. Nat. 1976, 110:743-778.
22. Gower S.T., Norman J.M. Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad-leaf plantations. Ecology 1991, 72:1896-1900.
23. Hari P., Kulmala M. Station for measuring ecosystem-atmosphere relations (SMEAR II). Bor. Environ. Res. 2005, 10:315-322.
24. Hari P., Mäkelä A., Pohja T. Surprising implications of the optimality hypothesis of stomatal regulation gain support in a field test. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 27:77-80.
25. Hari P., Mäkelä A., Berninger F., Pohja T. Field evidence for the optimality hypothesis of gas exchange in plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1999, 26:239-244.
26. Hari P., Mäkelä A., Kospilahti E., Holmberg M. Optimal control of gas exchange. Tree Physiol. 1986, 2:169-175.
27. Harman I.N., Finnigan J.J. A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sub-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2007, 123:339-363.
28. 2 efflux measurements. Tree Phys. 2009, 29:1447-1456.
29. Jarvis P.G. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1976, 273:593-610.
30. Jarvis P.G., McNaughton K.G. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1986, 15:1-49.
31. Juang J.Y., Katul G.G., Siqueira M.B., Stoy P.C., McCarthy H.R. Investigating a hierarchy of Eulerian closure models for scalar transfer inside forested canopies. Boundary- Layer Meteorol. 2008, 128:1-32.
32. 2 on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105:431-442.
33. 2-enriched atmosphere explained by economics of gas exchange. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:968-979.
34. Katul G.G., Cava D., Poggi D., Albertson J.D., Mahrt L. Stationarity, homogeneity, and ergodicity in canopy turbulence. Handbook of micrometeorology 2004, 29:161-180. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Katul G.G., Mahrt L., Poggi D., Sanz C. One and two equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2004, 113:81-109.
36. 2 from measured conductance: a synthesis of approaches. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23:1313-1328.
37. 2 fluxes of a boreal Scots pine forest. Bor. Environ. Res. 2009, 14:761-783.
38. Kolari P., Pumpanen J., Kulmala L., Ilvesniemi H., Nikinmaa E., Grönholm T., Hari P. Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 221:241-248.
39. 2. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 253:638-658.
40. 2 fluxes at the floor of a boreal pine forest. Tellus 2008, 60B:167-178.
41. 2 and water vapor turbulent flux distributions within forest canopy. J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105:26333-26351.
42. Launiainen S. Seasonal and inter-annual variability of energy exchange of a boreal Scots pine forest. Biogeosciences 2010, 7:3921-3940.
43. Launiainen S., Vesala T., Mölder M., Mammarella I., Smolander S., Rannik Ü., Kolari P., Hari P., Lindroth A., Katul G.G. Vertical variability and effect of stability on turbulence characteristics down to the floor of a pine forest. Tellus 2007, 59B:919-936.
44. 2 and sensible and latent heat fluxes during a full year in a boreal pine forest trunk-space. Bor. Environ. Res. 2005, 10:569-588.
45. cmax. J. Exp. Bot. 1997, 48:345-347.
46. 3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:339-355.
47. Leverenz J.W. Chlorophyll content and the light response curve of shade adapted conifer needles. Physiol. Plant. 1987, 71:20-29.
48. Manzoni S., Vigo G., Katul G., Fay P.A., Polley H.W., Palmroth S., Porporato A. Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01822.x.
49. Mott K.A., Parkhurst D.F. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:509-515.
50. Mott K.A., Peak D. Stomatal patchiness and task-performing networks. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99:219-226.
51. Mäkelä A., Berninger F., Hari P. Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: theoretical analysis. Ann. Bot. 1996, 77:461-468.
52. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Katul G.G:, Pataki D.E., Ewers B.E., Phillips N., Shafer K.V.R. Survey and synthesis of intra- and inter-specific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:1515-1526.
53. Palmroth S., Hari P. Evaluation of the importance of acclimation of needle structure, photosynthesis, and respiration to available photosynthetically active radiation in a Scots pine canopy. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31:1235-1243.
54. Palmroth S., Berninger F., Nikinmaa E., Lloyd J., Pulkkinen P., Hari P. Structural adaptation rather than water conservation was observed in Scots pine over a range of wet to dry climates. Oecologia 1999, 121:302-309.
55. 2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytol. 1994, 126:449-479.
56. 2 efflux: analysis of error sources related to the chamber system. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106:7985-7992.
57. 2 exchange by eddy-covariance and profile techniques. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 126:141-155.
58. Raupach M.R., Shaw R.H. Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1982, 22:79-90.
59. Schulze E.D., Buschbom U., Evenari M., Lange O.L., Kappen L. Stomatal responses to changes in humidity in plants growing in desert. Planta 1972, 108:259-270.
60. Schymanski S.J., Rodrick M., Sivapalan M., Hutley L., Beringer J. A canopy scale test of the optimal water-use hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:97-111.
61. 2 uptake by natural vegetation. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:1586-1598.
62. Sellers P.J., Randall D.A., Collatz G.J., Berry J.A., Field C.B., Dazlich D.A., Zhang C., Collelo G.D., Bounoua L. A revised land-surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCM:s. Part 1: model formulation. J. Climate 1996, 9:676-705.
63. 2 sources and sinks, fluxes, and mean concentration within the roughness sub-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2010, 135:31-50.
64. Siqueira M.B, Katul G.G. imating heat sources and fluxes in thermally stratified canopy flows using higher-order closure models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2002, 103:125-142.
65. Stenberg P. Implications of shoot structure on the rate of photosynthesis at different levels in a coniferous canopy using a model incorporating grouping and penumbra. Funct. Ecol. 1998, 12:82-91.
66. Vesala T., Suni T., Rannik ü., Keronen P., Markkanen T., Sevanto S., Grönholm T., Smolander S., Kulmala M., Ilvesniemi H., Ojansuu R., Uotila A., Levula J., Mäkelä A., Pumpanen J., Kolari P., Kulmala L., Altimir N., Berninger F., Nikinmaa E., Hari P. The effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 2005, 19:GB2001. 10.1029/2004GB002316.
67. 2 exchange estimation for Scots pine. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2000, 100:337-347.
68. Vesala T., Haataja J., Aalto P., Altimir N., Buzorius G., Garam E., Hämeri K., Ilvesniemi H., Jokinen V., Keronen P., Lahti T., Markkanen T., Mäkelä J.M., Nikinmaa E., Palmroth S., Palva L., Pohja T., Pumpanen J., Rannik ü., Siivola E., Ylitalo H., Hari P., Kulmala M. Long-term field measurements of atmosphere-surface interactions in boreal forest combining forest ecology, micrometeorology, aerosol physics and atmospheric chemistry. Trends Heat, Mass Momentum Transfer 1998, 4:17-35.
69. 2. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1996, 82:195-217.