Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: An experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 3654-3662

  Ditzel, M ^a   Deerenberg, E B ^a   Grotenhuis, N ^a   Harlaar, J J ^a   Monkhorst, K ^a   Bastiaansen Jenniskens, Y M ^a   Jeekel, J ^a   Lange, J F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adhesions; Biomesh; Collagen; Hernia; Intraperitoneal; Mesh

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; POLYESTER; POLYPROPYLENE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; TISSUE ADHESION; VISCERA;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLLAGEN; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; POLYESTERS; POLYPROPYLENES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SPECIFIC PATHOGEN-FREE ORGANISMS; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 84885175360     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2939-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1996) Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 162:125-129
2. Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485-488 (Pubitemid 19106444)
3. Bevis PM et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 97:1497-1502
4. Hoer J et al (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474-480
5. Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578-583 discussion 583-585
6. Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392-398 (Pubitemid 30626121)
7. Sajid MS et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197:64-72
8. Olmi S et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555-559 (Pubitemid 46439388)
9. Sauerland S et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD007781
10. Luijendijk RW et al (1996) Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 223:242-248 (Pubitemid 26086714)
11. Ellis H et al (1999) Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476-1480 (Pubitemid 29204365)
12. Stanciu D, Menzies D (2007) The magnitude of adhesion-related problems. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):35-38 (Pubitemid 47323716)
13. Leber GE et al (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133:378-382 (Pubitemid 28193521)
14. Burger JW et al (2006) Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:1320-1325 (Pubitemid 44259064)
15. Halm JA et al (2007) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World J Surg 31:423-429 discussion 430 (Pubitemid 46183534)
16. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362:1561-1571 (Pubitemid 37410198)
17. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2010) Visceral adhesions to hernia prostheses. Hernia 14:375-381
18. Breuing K et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544-558
19. Bellows CF, Alder A, Helton WS (2006) Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:657-675 (Pubitemid 44650454)
20. Melman L et al (2011) Early biocompatibility of cross-linked and non-cross-linked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Hernia 15:157-164
21. Duan X, Sheardown H (2005) Crosslinking of collagen with dendrimers. J Biomed Mater Res A 75:510-518 (Pubitemid 47233435)
22. Alponat A et al (1997) Prevention of adhesions by Seprafilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: an incisional hernia model in rats. Am Surg 63:818-819 (Pubitemid 27375510)
23. Coleman R (2009) Picrosirius red staining revisited. Acta Histochemica 111:393-470
24. Baptista ML et al (2000) Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy. J Am Coll Surg 190:271-280 (Pubitemid 30118384)
25. Binnebosel M et al (2008) Morphology, quality, and composition in mature human peritoneal adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:59-66 (Pubitemid 350196880)
26. Epstein JC et al (2006) Human peritoneal adhesions show evidence of tissue remodeling and markers of angiogenesis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1885-1892 (Pubitemid 44853446)
27. Roy S et al (2004) Reactive oxygen species and EGR-1 gene expression in surgical postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Surg 28:316-320 (Pubitemid 38375536)
28. Schreinemacher MH et al (2009) Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 96:305-313
29. Chelala E et al (2010) Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis. Hernia 14:123-129
30. Zinther NB, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H (2010) Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model. Hernia 14:283-289
31. Petter-Puchner AH et al (2011) Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration. Surg Endosc 25:3245-3252
32. Poulose BK et al (2005) Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa. J Surg Res 123:262-267 (Pubitemid 40186907)
33. Clarke KM et al (1996) Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 60:107-114 (Pubitemid 26044305)
34. Connor J et al (2009) Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model. Regen Med 4:185-195
35. Mulier KE et al (2011) Comparison of Permacol and Strattice for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Hernia 15:315-319
36. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1275-1285
37. Stanwix MG et al (2012) Abdominal ventral hernia repair with current biological prostheses: an experimental large animal model. Ann Plast Surg 66:403-409
38. Schug-Pass C et al (2009) The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily? Experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model. Surg Endosc 23:487-495
39. Schug-Pass C et al (2006) A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:402-409 (Pubitemid 43260496)