Abdominal ventral hernia repair with current biological prostheses: An experimental large animal model

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 403-409

  Stanwix, Matthew G ^a   Nam, Arthur J ^a   Hui Chou, Helen G ^a   Ferrari, Jonathan P ^a   Aberman, Harold M ^a   Hawes, Michael L ^a   Keledjian, Kaspar M ^a   Jones, Luke S ^a   Rodriguez, Eduardo D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b R ADAMS COWLEY SHOCK TRAUMA CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

alloderm; animal model; bioprosthesis; dermamatrix; neovascularization; permacol; ventral hernia

Indexed keywords

ALLODERM; BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; BIOPROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COLLAGEN; HERNIA, VENTRAL; MODELS, ANIMAL; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952898898     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181e051ed     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284:931-933. (Pubitemid 12192942)
2. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392-398. (Pubitemid 30626121)
3. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72:70-71. (Pubitemid 15158872)
4. Regnard JF, Hay JM, Rea S, et al. Ventral incisional hernias: incidence, date of recurrence, localization and risk factors. Ital J Surg Sci. 1988;18:259-263.
5. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, et al. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24:95-100.
6. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC, et al. Incisional hernia recurrence following "vest-over-pants" or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg. 1997;21:62-65.
7. Brown GL, Richardson JD, Malangoni MA, et al. Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg. 1985;201:705-711. (Pubitemid 15019629)
8. Clagett GP, Bowers BL, Lopez-Viego MA, et al. Creation of a neo-aortoiliac system from lower extremity deep and superficial veins. Ann Surg. 1993;218:239-248.
9. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, et al. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res. 2003;114:126-130.
10. Murphy JL, Freeman JB, Dionne PG. Comparison of Marlex and Gore-tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Can J Surg. 1989;32:244-247. (Pubitemid 19201026)
11. Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Munitiz V, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using a prosthesis. Hernia. 2001;5:148-152. (Pubitemid 33039810)
12. Usher FC. Hernia repair with Marlex mesh: an analysis of 541 cases. Arch Surg. 1962;84:325-328.
13. Dayton MT, Buchele BA, Shirazi SS, et al. Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal-wall defects. Arch Surg. 1986;121:954-960. (Pubitemid 16039347)
14. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 1994;219:643-650.
15. De Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, et al. "Components separation technique" for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:32-38.
16. Lowe JB III, Lowe JB, Baty JD, et al. Risks associated with "components separation" for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1276-1283.
17. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:519-526. (Pubitemid 20266669)
18. Shestak KC, Edington HJ, Johnson RR. The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications, and limitations revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:731-738. (Pubitemid 30111017)
19. Disa JJ, Goldberg NH, Carlton JM, et al. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:979-986. (Pubitemid 28162828)
20. Williams JK, Carlson GW, deChalain T, et al. Role of tensor fasciae latae in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:713-718. (Pubitemid 28113778)
21. Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, Byrnes CK, et al. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:523-527. (Pubitemid 36534926)
22. Demirer S, Gecim IE, Aydinuraz K, et al. Affinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materials. J Surg Res. 2001;99:70-74. (Pubitemid 32613961)
23. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1275-1285.
24. Holton LH III, Kim D, Silverman RP, et al. Human acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects: review of clinical experience and experimental data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15:547-558. (Pubitemid 41639807)
25. Srivastava A, DeSagun EZ, Jennings LJ, et al. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix as a dermal substitute in rats. Ann Surg. 2001;233:400-407.
26. Srivastava A, Jennings LJ, Hanumadass M, et al. Xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix as a dermal substitute in rats. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20:382-388.
27. Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, et al. In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Hernia. 2006;10:120-124.
28. Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, et al. Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:765-771. (Pubitemid 35375424)
29. Trabuco EC, Zobitz ME, Klingele CJ, et al. Effect of host response (incorporation, encapsulation, mixed incorporation and encapsulation, or resorption) on the tensile strength of graft-reinforced repair in the rat ventral hernia model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:638.e1-638.e6.
30. Eppley BL. Experimental assessment of the revascularization of acellular human dermis for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:757-762. (Pubitemid 32181417)
31. Oliver RF, Barker H, Cooke A, et al. Dermal collagen implants. Biomaterials. 1982;3:38-40. (Pubitemid 12104451)
32. Oliver RF, Grant RA, Cox RW, et al. Histological studies of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal implants of trypsin-prepared dermal collagen allografts in the rat. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;115:291-302.
33. Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, et al. Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:654-660. (Pubitemid 47615492)
34. Candage R, Jones K, Luchette FA, et al. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe? Surgery. 2008;144:703-709.
35. Schuster R, Singh J, Safadi BY, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix for contaminated abdominal wall defects: wound status predicts success. Am J Surg. 2006;192:594-597. (Pubitemid 44634350)
36. De Moya MA, Dunham M, Inaba K, et al. Long-term outcome of acellular dermal matrix when used for large traumatic open abdomen. J Trauma. 2008;65:349-353.
37. Bluebond-Langner R, Keifa ES, Mithani S, et al. Recurrent abdominal laxity following interpositional human acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:76-80. (Pubitemid 351317755)
38. Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JN, et al. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:553-555.
39. Hsu PW, Salgado CJ, Kent K, et al. Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1484-1489.
40. Shaikh FM, Giri SK, Durrani S, et al. Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects. World J Surg. 2007;31:1966-1972. (Pubitemid 47415718)
41. Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, et al. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg. 2006;63:255-258. (Pubitemid 44028507)
42. Kelly DA, Rockwell WB, Siddiqi F. Pelvic and abdominal wall reconstruction using human acellular dermis in the separation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:417-420.
43. Milburn ML, Holton LH III, Goldberg NH, et al. Effect of suture material on tensile strength and complication rate in abdominal fascial defects repaired with acellular dermal matrix. Hernia. 2008;2:33-38.
44. Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH III, et al. Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model. Hernia. 2004;8:336-342. (Pubitemid 39530572)
45. Ayubi FS, Armstrong PJ, Mattia MS, et al. Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol and Surgisis grafts in a rat hernia model. Hernia. 2008;12:373-378.
46. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny RH, Walder N, et al. Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2008;145:105-110. (Pubitemid 351221095)
47. Gordley K, Cole P, Hicks J, et al. Comparative, long term assessment of soft tissue substitutes: AlloDerm, Enduragen, and Dermamatrix. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:849-850.
48. Rho GJ, Kumar BM, Balasubramanian SS. Porcine mesenchymal stem cells-current technological status and future perspective. Front Biosci. 2009;14:3942-3961.
49. Ibrahim Z, Busch J, Awwad M, et al. Selected physiologic compatibilities and incompatibilities between human and porcine organ systems. Xenotransplantation. 2006;13:488-499. (Pubitemid 44592548)
50. Moore MA, Adams AK. Calcification resistance, biostability, and low immunogenic potential of porcine heart valves modified by dye-mediated photooxidation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:24-30. (Pubitemid 32436309)
51. Clark KJ, Carlson DF, Fahrenkrug SC. Pigs taking wing with transposons and recombinases. Genome Biol. 2007;8(suppl 1): S13.