The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: Are there differences in biocompatibily?: Experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 487-495

  Schug Pass, Christine ^a   Sommerer, Florian ^b   Tannapfel, Andrea ^b   Lippert, Hans ^c   Köckerling, Ferdinand ^a,d  

^a Vivantes Klinikum Spandau   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Biocompatibility; Composite mesh; Experimental; Hernia; Laparoscopic; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

CELL MARKER; POLYPROPYLENE; BIOMATERIAL; CD68 ANTIGEN; KI 67 ANTIGEN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTIC PIG; EXCISION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HERNIOPLASTY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; OMENTUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; ABDOMINAL WALL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SWINE; APOPTOSIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; INTESTINE INJURY; MATERIAL COATING; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LAPAROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE;

EID: 60449105289     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0085-8     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. O Alimoglu A Akcakaya M Sahin Y Unlu OV Ozkan E Sanli R Erylmaz 2003 Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study) Hepatogastroenterology 50 725 728
2. PK Amid AG Shulman IL Lichtenstein S Sostrin J Young M Hakakha 1994 Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines J Biomed Mater Res 28 373 375
3. JP Arnaud S Hennekinne-Mucci P Pessaux JJ Tuech C Aube 2003 Ultrasound detection of visceral adhesion after intraperitoneal ventral hernia treatment: a comparative study of protected versus unprotected meshes Hernia 7 85 88
4. ML Baptista ME Bonsack I Felemovicius JP Delaney 2000 Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy J Am Coll Surg 190 271 280
5. A Baykal K Yorganci C Sokemensuer E Hamaloglu N Renda I Sayek 2000 An experimental study of the adhesive potential of different meshes Eur J Surg 166 490 494
6. JM Bellon A Garcia-Carranza F Jurado N Garcia-Honduvilla A Carrera-San Martin J Bujan 2001 Peritoneal regeneration after implant of composite prosthesis in the abdominal wall World J Surg 25 147 152
7. JM Bellon N Garcia-Honduvilla F Jurado A Garcia-Carranza F Garcia-Moreno AC Martin J Bujan 2001 Use of composite prostheses in the repair of defects in abdominal wall: prosthetic behaviour at the peritoneum Eur J Surg 167 666 671
8. JM Bellon F Jurado N Garcia-Honduvilla R Lopez A Carrera-San Martin J Bujan 2002 The structure of a biomaterial rather than its chemical composition modulates the repair process at the peritoneal level Am J Surg 184 154 159
9. JM Bellon M Rodriguez N Garcia-Honduvilla G Pascual J Bujan 2007 Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes Am J Surg 194 68 74
10. JM Bellon M Rodriguez N Garcia-Honduvilla G Pascual V Gomez Gil J Bujan 2007 Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17 160 166
11. Berger D (2007) Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST (R)). epub ahead of print, Hernia
12. H Besim Y Yalcin O Hamamci K Arslan M Sonisik A Korkmaz S Erdogan 2002 Prevention of intraabdominal adhesions produced by polypropylene mesh Eur Surg Res 34 239 243
13. JW Burger JA Halm AR Wijsmuller S ten Raa J Jeekel 2006 Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair Surg Endosc 20 1320 1325
14. PM Christoforoni YB Kim Z Preys RY Lay FJ Montz 1996 Adhesion formation after incisional hernia repair: a randomized porcine trial Am Surg 62 935 938
15. WS Cobb JM Burns RD Peindl AM Carbonell BD Matthews KW Kercher BT Heniford 2006 Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight and light-weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model J Surg Res 136 1 7
16. J Conze R Rosch U Klinge C Weiss M Anurov S Titkowa A Oettinger V Schumpelick 2004 Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore-size and surface area Hernia 8 365 372
17. J Conze K Junge U Klinge C Weiss M Polivoda AP Oettinger V Schumpelick 2005 Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin Surg Endosc 19 798 803
18. E Dilege H Coskun B Gunduz D Sakiz M Mihmanli 2006 Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh in incisional ventral hernias: comparison of different barriers in an experimental model Eur Surg Res 38 358 364
19. RC Dinsmore WC Calton SB Harvey MW Blaney 2000 Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh in a traumatized bowel model J Am Coll Surg 191 131 136
20. Duffy AJ Hogle LaPerle KM NJ DL Fowler 2004 Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model Hernia 8 358 364
21. JR Eriksen I Gögenur J Rosenberg 2007 Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair Hernia 11 481 492
22. I Felemovicius ME Bonsack G Hagerman JP Delaney 2004 Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh J Am Coll Surg 198 543 548
23. RJ Fitzgibbons Jr GM Salerno CJ Filipi WJ Hunter P Watson 1994 A laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique for the repair of an indirect inguinal hernia Ann Surg 219 144 156
24. RJ Fitzgibbons Jr 2000 Adding laparoscopy to experimental adhesion study protocols J Am Coll Surg 190 336 338
25. A Garcia-Ruiz T Naitoh M Gagner 1998 A porcine model for laparoscopc ventral hernia repair Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 35 39
26. R Gonzalez GT Rodeheaver DL Moody PA Foresman BJ Ramshaw 2004 Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in abdominal cavity Hernia 8 213 219
27. CN Gutt T Oniu A Mehrabi W Büchler 2004 Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18 898 906
28. JA Halm LL de Wall EW Steyerberg J Jeekel JF Lange 2006 Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery World J Surg 31 423 429
29. AG Harrell YW Novitsky RD Peindl WS Cobb CE Austin JA Cristiano JH Norton KW Kercher BT Heniford 2006 Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intraabdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model Am Surg 72 808 813
30. S Hengirmen M Cete A Soran F Aksoy H Sencer E Olcay 1998 Comparison of meshes for the repair of abdominal wall defects J Invest Surg 11 315 325
31. BP Jacob NJ Hogle E Durak T Kim DL Fowler 2007 Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite Surg Endosc 21 629 633
32. TW Judge DM Parker RC Dinsmore 2007 Abdominal wall hernia repair. A comparison of sepramesh and parietex composite mesh in a rabbit hernia model J Am Coll Surg 204 276 281
33. K Junge R Rosch U Klinge C Krones B Klosterhalfen PR Mertens P Lynen D Kunz A Preiss H Peltroche-Llacsahuanga V Schumpelick 2005 Gentamicin supplementation of polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials for infection prophylaxis Biomaterials 26 787 793
34. K Junge U Klinge R Rosch P Lynen M Binnebösel J Conze PR Mertens R Schwab V Schumpelick 2007 Improved collagen I/III ratio at the interface of gentamicin-supplemented polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials Langenbeck's Arch Surg 392 465 471
35. HA Kayaoglu N Ozkan SM Hazinedaroglu OF Ersoy AB Erkek RD Koseoglu 2005 Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty J Invest Surg 18 89 95
36. U Klinge B Klosterhalfen AP Ottinger K Junge V Schumpelick 2002 PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes Biomaterials 23 3487 3493
37. RH Koehler D Begos D Berger S Carey K LeBlanc A Park B Ramshaw R Smoot G Voeller 2003 Minimal Adhesions to ePTFE mesh after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: reoperative findings in 65 cases JSLS 7 335 340
38. JJ McGinty NJ Hogle H McCarthy DL Fowler 2005 A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh Surg Endosc 19 786 790
39. G Morris-Stiff LE Hughes 1998 The outcomes of non-absorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience J Am Coll Surg 186 352 357
40. MM Ozmen AK Aslar MC Terzi L Albayrak M Berberoglu 2002 Prevention of adhesions by bioresorbable tissue barrier following laparoscopic intraabdominal mesh insertion Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12 342 346
41. TN Robinson JH Clarke J Schoen MD Walsh 2005 Major-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration Surg Endosc 19 1556 1560
42. LR Rudmik C Schieman E Dixon E Debru 2006 Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature Hernia 10 110 119
43. C Schug-Pass C Tamme A Tannapfel F Köckerling 2006 A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias-comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model Surg Endosc 20 402 409
44. ®) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions in laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained in the laparoscopic porcine model. Surg Endosc 2008 Apr 24 (Epub ahead of print)
45. CJJM Sikkink TS Vries de Reilingh AW Malyar JA Jansen RP Bleichrodt H van Goor 2006 Adhesion formation and reherniation differ between meshes used for abdominal wall reconstruction Hernia 10 218 222
46. J Thompson 1998 Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation Dig Surg 15 153 157
47. M van't Riet PJ van Steenwijk F Bonthuis RL Marquet EW Steyerberg J Jeekel HJ Bonjer 2003 Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model Ann Surg 237 123 128
48. M van't Riet WA Burger F Bonthuis J Jeekel HJ Bonjer 2004 Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair Surg Endosc 18 681 685
49. WW Vrijland F Bonthuis EW Steyerberg RL Marquet J Jeekel HJ Bonjer 2000 Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair Surg Endosc 14 960 963
50. D Weyhe O Belyaev C Müller K Meurer KH Bauer G Papapostou W Uhl 2007 Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes-a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature Word J Surg 31 234 244
51. ER Winslow S Diaz K Desai T Meininger NJ Soper ME Klingensmith 2004 Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in a porcine model: what do transfixation sutures add? Surg Endsoc 18 529 535