Older Adults' perceptions of home telehealth services

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 786-790

  Cimperman, Miha ^a   Brenčič, Maja Makovec ^a   Trkman, Peter ^a   Stanonik, Mateja De Leonni ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

home telehealth services; older adults; telehealth adoption predicting factors

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING; TELEMEDICINE;

ASSISTED LIVING TECHNOLOGIES; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; HOME TELEHEALTH; OLDER ADULTS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TELEHEALTH; TELEMEDICINE SERVICES;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

EID: 84885049720     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0272     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Koch S. Meeting the challenges-The role of medical informatics in an ageing society. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 25-31.
2. Bensink M, Hailey D, Wootton R. A systematic review of successes and failures in home telehealth: Preliminary results. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12: 8-16.
3. Liu C-F. Key factors influencing the intention of telecare adoption: An institutional perspective. Telemed J E Health 2011; 17: 288-293.
4. Onor ML, Trevisiol M, Urciuoli O, Misan S, Bertossi F, Tirone G, et al. Effectiveness of telecare in elderly populations-A comparison of three settings. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 164-169.
5. Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Potthoff S. Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare. Telemed J E Health 2006; 12: 128-136.
6. Chiu K-H, Yang YY. Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home in Taiwan. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 717-726.
7. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989; 13: 319-340.
8. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003; 27: 425-78.
9. Janz BD, Hennington A. Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: Applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 2007; 19: 60-80.
10. Taylor S, Todd P. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Q 1995; 19: 561-570.
11. Or CKL, Karsh B-T. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 550-560.
12. Agarwal R, Angst C. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Q 2009; 33: 339-370.
13. Agarwal S, Lau CT. Remote health monitoring using mobile phones and Web services. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 603-607.
14. Jen W-Y, Hung M-C. An empirical study of adopting mobile healthcare service: The family's perspective on the healthcare needs of their elderly members. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 41-48.
15. Or CKL, Karsh B-T, Severtson DJ, Burke LJ, Brown RL, Brennan PF. Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive selfmanagement technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 51-59.
16. Rahimpour M, Lovell NH, Celler BG, McCormick J. Patients' perceptions of a home telecare system. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77: 486-498.
17. Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 788-801.
18. Botsis T, Hartvigsen G. Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 195-203.
19. Beckers JJ, Schmidt HG. The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Comput Hum Behav 2001; 17: 35-49.
20. Ellis D, Allaire JC. Modeling computer interest in older adults: The role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Hum Factors 1999; 41: 345-355.
21. Rosen LD, Weil MM. Computer anxiety: A cross-cultural comparison of university students in ten countries. Comput Hum Behav 1995; 11: 45-64.
22. Phang CW, Sutanto J, Kankanhalli A, Li Y, Tan BC, Teo H-H. Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 2006; 53: 555-569.
23. Laguna K, Babcock RL. Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Comput Hum Behav 1997; 13: 317-326.
24. Li X, Hess TJ, Valacich JS. Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. J Strategic Inform Syst 2008; 17: 39-71.
25. Chellappa RK, Pavlou PA. Perceived information security, financial liability and consumer trust in electronic commerce transactions. Logistics Inform Manage 2002; 15: 358-68.
26. Suh B, Han I. The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. Int J Electron Commerce 2003; 7: 135-61.
27. Welsh S, Hassiotis A, O'Mahoney G, Deahl M. Big brother is watching you-The ethical implications of electronic surveillance measures in the elderly with dementia and in adults with learning difficulties. Aging Mental Health 2003; 7: 372.
28. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191-215.
29. Igbaria M, Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega 1995; 23: 587-605.
30. Lam J, Lee M. Bridging the Digital Divide-The roles of internet self-efficacy towards learning computer and the internet among elderly in Hong Kong, China. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005, City University of Hong Kong. HICSS.'05. 2005: 266b.
31. Abramson ZH, Cohen-Naor V. Factors associated with performance of influenza immunization among the elderly. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2: 902-907.
32. Asherman I, Asherman S. The negotiation sourcebook. Indiana University: Human Resource Development, 2001: 70.
33. Litosseliti L. Using focus groups in research. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003.
34. Moschis GP, Lee E, Mathur A. Targeting the mature market: Opportunities and challenges. J Consumer Marketing 1997; 14: 282-293.
35. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 40-51.
36. European Commission, Directorate General for Information Society and Media. ICT & ageing, European study on users, markets and technologies. 2010. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/activities/ einclusion/library/studies/docs/ict-ageing-final-report.pdf (last accessed January 15, 2013).
37. Morris MG, Ozanne E, Miller K, et al. Smart technologies for older people. 2012. Melbourne, Australia: Institute for a Broadband-Enabled Society, 2012. Available at http://broadband.unimelb.edu.au/resources/Smart- technologiesfor-older-people.pdf (last accessed January 15, 2013).
38. Chu RJ. How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults-Analyses of gender and age differences. Comput Educ 2010; 55: 255-264.
39. Jacko JA, Sears A. The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2003: 417.