The Condition Dependency Of Fitness In Males And Females: The Fitness Consequences Of Juvenile Diet Assessed In Environments Differing In Key Adult Resources

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2849-2860

  Zikovitz, Andrea E ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Condition; Diet manipulation; Resource abundance; Selection; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY CONDITION; ENTOMOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FITNESS; FLY; FOOD AVAILABILITY; JUVENILE; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SEX RATIO; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; YEAST;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY CONSTITUTION; CONDITION; DIET; DIET MANIPULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; LARVA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; RESOURCE ABUNDANCE; SELECTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CONDITION; DIET MANIPULATION; RESOURCE ABUNDANCE; SELECTION; SEX RATIO;

ANIMALS; BODY CONSTITUTION; DIET; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; LARVA; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84885036307     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12170     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock 2010. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:450-458.
2. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
3. Amitin, E. G., and S. Pitnick 2007. Influence of developmental environment on male- and female-mediated sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 20:381-391.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
5. Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J. S. White 2008. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:127-135.
6. Clark, S. C. A., N. P. Sharp, L. Rowe, and A. F. Agrawal 2012. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 7:e37351.
7. Carlson, K. A., and L. G. Harshman 1999. Extended longevity lines of Drosophila melanogaster: characterization of oocyte stages and ovariole numbers as a function of age and diet. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 54:B432-B440.
8. Chapman, T., and L. Partridge 1996. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 163:755-759.
9. Chippindale, A. K., A. M. Leroi, S. B. Kim, and M. R. Rose 1993. Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 6:171-193.
10. Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:771-783.
11. Crawley, M. J. 2007. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex.
12. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York.
13. Evans, B. J., L. Pin, D. J. Melnick, and S. I. Wright 2010. Sex-linked inheritance in macaque monkeys: implications for effective population size and dispersal to Sulawesi. Genetics 185:923-937.
14. Fairbairn, D. J., and A. E. Wilby 2001. Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 667-686.
15. Fisher, S. H., and G. G. Rosenthal 2006. Hungry females show stronger mating preferences. Behav. Ecol. 17:979-981.
16. Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (Coho: oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:637-657.
17. Fox, J. 2009. Car: companion to applied regression. R package version 1.2-16. Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=car.
18. Fricke, C., A. Bretman, and T. Chapman 2008. Adult male nutrition and reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62:3170-3177.
19. Gosden, T. P., and S. F. Chenoweth 2011. On the evolution of heightened condition-dependence of male sexual displays. J. Evol. Biol. 24:685-692.
20. Gowaty, P. A., Y.-K. Kim, and W. W. Anderson 2012. No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:11740-11745.
21. Green, A. J. 2001. Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473-1483.
22. Grether, G. F., G. R. Kolluru, F. H. Rodd, J. de la Cerda, and K. Shimazaki 2005. Carotenoid availability affects the development of a colour-based mate preference and the sensory bias to which it is genetically linked. Proc. R. Soc. B 272:2181-2188.
23. Gromko, M. H., and T. A. Markow 1993. Courtship and remating in field populations of Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 45:253-262.
24. Gwynne, D.T. 1993. Food quality controls sexual selection in Mormon crickets by altering male mating investment. Ecology 74: 1406-1413.
25. Hebets, E. A., J. Wesson, and P. S. Shamble 2008. Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders. Anim. Behav. 76: 355-363.
26. Hedrick, P. W. 2007. Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift. Evolution 61:2750-2771.
27. Hill, G. E. 2011. Condition-dependent traits as signals of the functionality of vital cellular processes. Ecol. Lett. 14:625-634.
28. Hodin, J., and L. M. Riddiford 2000. Different mechanisms underlie phenotypic plasticity and interspecific variation for a reproductive character in Drosopholids (Insecta: Diptera). Evolution 54:1638-1653.
29. Houle, D. 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45:630-648.
30. Hunt, J., R. Brooks, and M. D. Jennions 2005. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am. Nat. 166:79-92.
31. Jakob, E. M., S. D. Marshall, and G. W. Uetz 1996. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61-67.
32. Jirotkul, M. 1999. Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58:287-294.
33. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold 2004. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 164:444-456.
34. Klemme, I., H. Ylönen, and J. A. Eccard 2007. Reproductive success of male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus): the effect of operational sex ratio and body size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61:1911-1918.
35. Laporte, V., and B. Charlesworth 2002. Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations. Genetics 162:501-519.
36. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
37. Lauer, M. J., A. Sih, and J. J. Krupa 1996. Male density, female density and inter-sexual conflict in a stream-dwelling insect. Anim. Behav. 52:929-939.
38. Linder, J. E., and W. R. Rice 2005. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18:568-575.
39. Long, T. F., A. Pischedda, A. D. Stewart, and W. R. Rice 2009. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000254.
40. Manning, J. T. 1984. Males and the advantage of sex. J. Theor. Biol. 108:215-220.
41. McGraw, L. A., A. C. Fiumera, M. Ramakrishnan, S. Madhavarapu, A. G. Clark, and M. F. Wolfner 2007. Larval rearing environment affects several post-copulatory traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Lett. 3:607-610.
42. McLain, D. K. 1991. Components of variance in male lifetime copulatory and reproductive success in a seed bug. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29:121-126.
43. Mills, S. C., A. Grapputo, E. Koskela, and T. Mappes 2007. Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proc. R. Soc. B 274:143-150.
44. Ortigosa, A., and L. Rowe 2002 The effect of hunger on mating behaviour and sexual selection for large male size in Gerris buenoi. Anim. Behav. 64:369-375.
45. Peig, J., and A. J. Green 2009. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883-1891.
46. Perry, J. C., D. M. T. Sharpe, and L. Rowe 2009. Condition-dependent female remating resistance generates sexual selection on male size in a ladybird beetle. Anim. Behav. 77:743-748.
47. Pischedda, A., and W. R. Rice 2012. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:2049-2053.
48. Price, T., and D. Schluter 1991. On the low heritability of life history traits. Evolution 45:853-861.
49. Prokop, Z. M., J. E. Les, P. K. Banas, P. Koteja, J. Radwan Low inbreeding depression in a sexual trait in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Evol. Ecol. 24:827-837.
50. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
51. Rowe, L. 1992. Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim. Behav. 44:189-202.
52. Rowe, L., and D. Houle 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1415-1421.
53. Sang, J. H. 1950. Population growth in Drosophila cultures. Biol. Rev. 25:188-219.
54. Setchell, J. M., M. Charpentier, and E. J. Wickings 2005. Sexual selection and reproductive careers in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58:474-485.
55. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal 2009. Sexual selection and the random union of gametes: testing for a correlation in fitness between mates in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 174:613-622.
56. Stevenson, R. D., and W. A. Woods Jr. 2006. Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46:1169-1190.
57. Stewart, A. D., E. H. Morrow, and W. R. Rice 2005. Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:2029-2035.
58. Storz, J. F., U. Ramakrishnan, and S. C. Alberts 2001. Determinants of effective population size for loci with different modes of inheritance. J. Hered. 92:497-502.
59. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323-328.
60. Tu, M.-P., and M. Tatar 2003. Juvenile diet restriction and the aging and reproduction of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell 2:326-333.
61. Vargas, M. A., N. Luo, A. Yamaguchi, and P. Kapahi 2010. A role for S6 kinase in postmating dietary switch and balance of nutrients in D. melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 20:1006-1011.
62. van Noordwijk, A. J., and G. de Jong 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 128:137-142.
63. Vicoso, B., and B. Charlesworth 2009. Effective population size and the faster X effect: an extended model. Evolution 63:2413-2426.
64. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114:742-746.
65. Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446-461.
66. Webster, M. S., H. C. Chuang-Dobbs, and R. T. Holmes 2001. Microsatellite identification of extrapair sires in a socially monogamous warbler. Behav. Ecol. 12:439-446.
67. Whitlock, M. C., and A. F. Agrawal 2009. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63:569-582.
68. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection-selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53:205-214.